Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
It keeps getting better, and better:
Philip Shenon, David E. Sanger, New York Times Friday, April 2, 2004 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Washington -- The commission investigating the Sept. 11 attacks said Thursday that it was pressing the White House to explain why the Bush administration had blocked thousands of pages of classified foreign policy and counterterrorism documents from former President Bill Clinton's files from being turned over to the panel's investigators. The White House confirmed Thursday that it had withheld a variety of classified documents from Clinton's files that had been gathered by the National Archives over the last two years in response to document requests from the commission, which is investigating intelligence and law enforcement failures before the attacks. Scott McClellan, the White House spokesman, said some Clinton administration documents had been withheld because they were "duplicative or unrelated," while others were withheld because they were "highly sensitive" and the information contained in them could be relayed to the commission in other ways. "We are providing the commission with access to all the information they need to do their job," McClellan said. The commission and the White House were reacting Thursday to public complaints from former aides to Clinton, who said they had been surprised to learn in recent months that three-quarters of the nearly 11,000 pages of White House files it was ready to offer the commission had been withheld from the panel by the Bush administration. The former aides said the files, which are now in the custody of the National Archives, contained highly classified documents about the Clinton administration's efforts against al Qaeda. The commission said it was awaiting a full answer from the White House on why any documents were withheld. "We need to be satisfied that we have everything we have asked to see," said Al Felzenberg, a spokesman for the bipartisan 10-member commission. "We have voiced the concern to the White House that not all of the material the Clinton library has made available to us has made its way to the commission." The general counsel of Clinton's presidential foundation, Bruce Lindsey, who was Clinton's deputy White House counsel and one of his closest advisers, said he was concerned that the Bush administration had applied a "very legalistic approach to the documents" and might have blocked the release of material that would be valuable to the commission. He said he first complained to the commission about the situation in February after learning from the archives that the Bush administration had withheld so many documents. "I voiced a concern that the commission was making a judgment on an incomplete record," Lindsey said. "I want to know why there is a 75 percent difference between what we were ready to produce and what was being produced to the commission." The debate over the Clinton files was disclosed as the commission announced that it had reached agreement with the White House to schedule a public hearing for next Thursday, when Condoleezza Rice, Bush's national security adviser, will testify under oath for 2 1/2 hours. It also came as the White House, in an effort to bolster Rice's credibility before the hearing, released some of the language of a presidential directive awaiting Bush's signature on Sept. 11, 2001, that instructed the Pentagon to plan action against al Qaeda terrorists and their Taliban sponsors in Afghanistan, "including leadership, command-control- communication, training and logistics facilities." White House officials said the language showed that the Bush administration had a tougher, more comprehensive plan than the Clinton administration in dealing with both Osama bin Laden's terrorist network and the Taliban. Rice has cited the directive in recent interviews in trying to undermine the credibility of Richard Clarke, Bush's former counterterrorism director, who has accused the Bush administration of largely ignoring terrorist threats before Sept. 11. The disclosure that many Clinton administration files involving counterterrorism had been withheld from the commission on the order of the Bush administration took several of the members of the panel by surprise Thursday. "If it did happen, it's an unintentional mistake or it's another intentional act of the White House that will backfire," said Bob Kerrey, a former senator from Nebraska who is a Democratic member of the commission. Lindsey said Clinton and his foundation, which is based in Little Rock, Ark., had given authorization to the National Archives to gather evidence from Clinton's files that was sought by the independent commission. But the Bush administration, he said, had final authority to decide what would be turned over to the commission. Lindsey, who is Clinton's liaison to the National Archives, said he was surprised to discover from the archives that the Bush administration, after reviewing the Clinton documents gathered by researchers at the archives, had decided not to turn over most of the material. He said he had read through many of the 10,800 pages of Clinton White House documents that were collected by the archives and believed them to be valuable to the work of the panel. "They involved all of the issues -- al Qaeda, Osama bin Laden, terrorism, all of the areas with the commission's jurisdiction," he said. "The commission has voiced Lindsey's concern to the White House," said Felzenberg, the commission's spokesman. "We made the concerns known, and we are awaiting a definitive answer." |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Warren Buffett on BushCo | General | |||
BushCo to cut S.S. Benefits | General | |||
OT The Incredible Lying BushCO! | General | |||
OT Bush's lies upon lies. | General |