wrote in message ups.com... You are doing quite well preaching at one who is not a name-caller, but I notice you say little to those who are. Why would this be? ********** Because those who never contribute anything except steaming vomit are normally unworthy of response. Forgive the "preaching." I was merely addressing your comment (that you have given up trying to change to tone of rec.boats) by pointing out the one certain thing we all can do. I don't know why you should be so personally offended by the pronoun, "we", but- whatever. ************* JohnH wrote: If Jim bothers you, don't read his posts ********* When I deteriorate to launching attack threads, calling names, and following JimH around the NG throwing in snide personal remarks after everything he submits, you will know that he has finally "bothered" me. And you have done that in the past. JimH isn't such a terrible guy----he's at least consistent and you know *exactly* what to expect when he enters a thread. So is it that you *exactly* expect when I enter a thread Chuck? And how did I become the focus of conversation between you and John? |
|
wrote in message ups.com... John H wrote to Chuck: You are doing quite well preaching at one who is not a name-caller, but I notice you say little to those who are. Why would this be? ********** To which Chuck replied: Because those who never contribute anything except steaming vomit are normally unworthy of response. Wow, Chuck. I never thought you'd say something like that about Harry. After all, he is definitely a name-caller, and you *never* take him to task for it. So he *is* a contributor of the "steaming" kind, huh? Maybe this NG is about to turn a corner? Into being a *boating* NG. Jack |
So is it that you *exactly* expect when I enter a thread Chuck?
And how did I become the focus of conversation between you and John? *************** I expect you to behave as you always have. You are very consistent and predictable. (note: I did not say that has to be a bad thing) If you have some idea of just what you normally do here, then you are well aware of what certainly I, and probably most others, expect when you enter a thread. You became part of the conversation when John brought up your name. It wouldn't have occured to me to include you, by name, in the conversation without John's specific reference. |
Not offended. Observant. Have you ever spoke in like manner to Harry or
any of the other liberals who engage in the vulgar name-calling? It's not offensive, but it is remarkable, i.e. worthy of remark. ********** Don't be silly, John. If I criticize name calling in the group in general, I would be including everybody engaging in the practice, right? Where did you get the idea that the left gets a "pass"? |
|
THIS IS A REC BOATS FORUM TALK ABOUT BOATS DUMB ASS!
|
I've never seen you respond in this manner to the left.
********* Hint: "The Left" seldom chooses to debate me by calling names. |
On Thu, 26 May 2005 10:16:04 -0400, "Harry.Krause"
wrote: wrote: I've never seen you respond in this manner to the left. ********* Hint: "The Left" seldom chooses to debate me by calling names. You're an old, unaligned, salt. So there. Don't you mean old unaligned...er.... Never mind. :) Later, Tom |
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:23 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com