Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jim and Becky" wrote in message
... I saw a comparison in a boating magazine last fall. I didn't get a chance to read it all but essentially a new boat was offered in Inboard or I/O configurations. It was perhaps a 28 foot Regal or Rinker twin screw. Same engines yet the I/O had a top speed 10 mph higher than the straight inboard. Does anyone remember this aricle? I believe it was on the front page. Is this difference in speeds common and why? The inboard has a untrimable fixed prop, pointing about 13 degrees downward. This causes stern lift, which pushes the bow down, resulting in a higher wetted surface, hence the lower speeds. The I/O is trimable. Once on plane, the out drive can be trimmed up, which pushes the stern down and the bow up, resulting in less wetted surface...which means higher speeds. The advantages of an inboard is that they are much less complex, and have many fewer moving parts verses an I/O. They also (because they run flat in the water) generate very small wakes...perfect for a slalom ski boat. Big disadvantage...single screw inboards do not back well. The advantages of an I/O is that it is trimable, and backs like a car. You can even use the trim to alleviate a rough ride in choppy water. But even though it has less wetted surface, the propulsion system has more drag than an inboard. -- -Netsock "It's just about going fast...that's all..." http://home.insight.rr.com/cgreen/ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
A couple of newbie questions | General | |||
Evinrude FICHT beats out Yamaha in JD Powers survey | General | |||
COLREGS - The final word on pecking order in restricted visibility. | General | |||
Can Tow from Florida to Northeast for $$ | General | |||
Slow Cruising Speed Question | General |