Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Message from the Abu Hafs al-Masri Brigades:
"Praise be to God who gave us this victory in the conquest of Madrid... where one of the pillars of the axis of Crusader evil was destroyed," the statement said, affirming its earlier claim for the Madrid attacks. ------------------------------------------------------ When the polls are closed election day 2004, do you really want to read the following al Qaeda statement broadcast all over the news? "Praise be to God who gave us this victory in the conquest of America... where the final pillar of the axis of Crusader evil was destroyed." A vote for Kerry is victory for al Qaeda. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 22:53:38 GMT, "NOYB" wrote:
A vote for Kerry is victory for al Qaeda. Run on anything except Bush's record, eh? Nice straw man. bb |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "bb" wrote in message ... On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 22:53:38 GMT, "NOYB" wrote: A vote for Kerry is victory for al Qaeda. Run on anything except Bush's record, eh? Nice straw man. As a Conservative Republican, I'm very proud of Bush's record, and can (and have) successfully defended it against any partisan attacks. However, Democrats have decided to turn this election into an "anybody but Bush" campaign. Well, it's time for Americans to realize the danger of such a decision. It's no secret that al Qaeda would claim a huge victory should Bush be run from office. Why do you think that is? Supposedly, according to Democrats, the war on terror is a failure. However, our opponent continues to do everything possible to mar Bush's chances for reelection. If Bush's anti-terror policies were such a failure, the enemy wouldn't be so eager to see him replaced by a liberal Democrat. That's commonsense. By all indications, Bush is an enemy to radical Islam. Radical Islam is a threat to the survival of Western civilization...which makes them my (and your) enemy. And an enemy of our enemy is our friend. A vote for Kerry is a victory for al Qaeda. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net... "bb" wrote in message ... On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 22:53:38 GMT, "NOYB" wrote: A vote for Kerry is victory for al Qaeda. Run on anything except Bush's record, eh? Nice straw man. As a Conservative Republican, I'm very proud of Bush's record, and can (and have) successfully defended it against any partisan attacks. And I'm very proud of the lettuce seedlings in my front window. So what? However, Democrats have decided to turn this election into an "anybody but Bush" campaign. Well, it's time for Americans to realize the danger of such a decision. There is no danger. You need to think this through more thoroughly. It's no secret that al Qaeda would claim a huge victory should Bush be run from office. 1) They can claim whatever the f..k they want, but they know what you don't: Only a moron would draw a connection between the election results and the future of al Qaeda. 2) They've claimed a victory in the Spanish elections. Zzzzzzz..... Nobody cares. Why do you think that is? Supposedly, according to Democrats, the war on terror is a failure. If you base the quality of the results on whether there's been another attack HERE, then the results have been good. But, only a moron would limit his view to THIS country at this point in time. Iraq is still pretty much a free play zone, and the terrorist kiddies are having a ball. Therefore, that has been a failure. Afghanistan is also a circus, but you won't believe that. Try this: We thought we'd create a nice country that could behave like other nice countries. Just one problem: 60% of their GNP is derived from opium poppies, and there's not a damned thing we can do about it. However, our opponent continues to do everything possible to mar Bush's chances for reelection. If Bush's anti-terror policies were such a failure, the enemy wouldn't be so eager to see him replaced by a liberal Democrat. Let's see if I understand you: If we get a Democratic president, the war ends, the soldiers come home, and all domestic security measures enacted since 9/11 are reversed? Is that what you predict? |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Harry Krause" wrote in message news:c3dhc2g=.3d4a67ea3ab3c3d08f81a143402ec0b2@107 9614429.nulluser.com... NOYB wrote: Message from the Abu Hafs al-Masri Brigades: "Praise be to God who gave us this victory in the conquest of Madrid... where one of the pillars of the axis of Crusader evil was destroyed," the statement said, affirming its earlier claim for the Madrid attacks. ------------------------------------------------------ When the polls are closed election day 2004, do you really want to read the following al Qaeda statement broadcast all over the news? "Praise be to God who gave us this victory in the conquest of America... where the final pillar of the axis of Crusader evil was destroyed." A vote for Kerry is victory for al Qaeda. It must be wonderful to go through life as you do, without a real thought in your head, and able to follow a "leader" as simple-minded as you are, and even believe that both of you are doing the right thing. Bush *is* the epitome of Crusader evil. He doesn't know what the hell he is doing. He's done nothing at all to make the United States or the world safer. In fact, he's put all of us in a worse position than we've been in since the early days of World War II. And we all know how that conflict turned out! |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bush *is* the epitome of Crusader evil. He doesn't know what the hell he
is doing. He's done nothing at all to make the United States or the world safer. In fact, he's put all of us in a worse position than we've been in since the early days of World War II. And we all know how that conflict turned out! Irrelevant. Like comparing molars to watermelons. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
NOYB wrote:
As a Conservative Republican, I'm very proud of Bush's record, Really? Are you proud of his arrest record? Are you proud of his grandfather's record of selling war materials to Nazi Germany? More recently, how about his record of running and hiding when the US was actually under attack? That is something to be proud of all right. But that's all old news. Let's talk about the present. How about Bush's vetoing spending money on intel & security? That might really help fight terrorism, but he nixed it. How about his record of ignoring... and even falsifying... military casualties? His record of reducing veteran's benefits? How about his record of stonewalling the Sept 11 investigation? His record of going on vacation more than any other President, ever? His record of lying about many things, from the Clinton staff vandalizing the White House to his declaration that he would not use Sept 11th politically? How his record of bragging about his foreign policy success, while stabbing his own Secretary of State in the back and driving a wedge between the US and our longest & closest allies? It must take a supreme effort of the will to be proud of these things. Either that, or you're really a not-so-undercover Socialist agitator who mocks Bush by praising him. If that's the case, as I suspect, then you're overdoing it. DSK |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "NOYB" wrote in message ink.net... "bb" wrote in message ... On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 22:53:38 GMT, "NOYB" wrote: A vote for Kerry is victory for al Qaeda. Run on anything except Bush's record, eh? Nice straw man. As a Conservative Republican, I'm very proud of Bush's record, and can (and have) successfully defended it against any partisan attacks. And I'm very proud of the lettuce seedlings in my front window. So what? However, Democrats have decided to turn this election into an "anybody but Bush" campaign. Well, it's time for Americans to realize the danger of such a decision. There is no danger. You need to think this through more thoroughly. It's no secret that al Qaeda would claim a huge victory should Bush be run from office. 1) They can claim whatever the f..k they want, but they know what you don't: Only a moron would draw a connection between the election results and the future of al Qaeda. It'd be terrific propaganda. "By inflicting great harm on America and its allies, we were able to drive the evil Crusader Bush from office." You don't think that would be a terrific recruiting tool? You don't thank that al Qaeda training camps would teach the idea that the West's will can be broken, and its people and elections manipulated through acts of terror? 2) They've claimed a victory in the Spanish elections. Zzzzzzz..... Nobody cares. The terrorist care. The message coming out of all of the terror groups linked to al Qaeda is that the Spanish elections were a great victory for them. It was a morale-booster at a time when al Qaeda desperately needed one. Why do you think that is? Supposedly, according to Democrats, the war on terror is a failure. If you base the quality of the results on whether there's been another attack HERE, then the results have been good. But, only a moron would limit his view to THIS country at this point in time. Iraq is still pretty much a free play zone, and the terrorist kiddies are having a ball. Therefore, that has been a failure. Afghanistan is also a circus, but you won't believe that. Try this: We thought we'd create a nice country that could behave like other nice countries. Just one problem: 60% of their GNP is derived from opium poppies, and there's not a damned thing we can do about it. However, our opponent continues to do everything possible to mar Bush's chances for reelection. If Bush's anti-terror policies were such a failure, the enemy wouldn't be so eager to see him replaced by a liberal Democrat. Let's see if I understand you: If we get a Democratic president, the war ends, the soldiers come home, and all domestic security measures enacted since 9/11 are reversed? Is that what you predict? No. But I do predict an increase in al Qaeda's morale leading to emboldened attacks that result in further appeasement by the West. The end result? al Qaeda controls 2/3 of the World's oil supply, and America undergoes an economic collapse not seen since the Great Depression. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "DSK" wrote in message news ![]() NOYB wrote: As a Conservative Republican, I'm very proud of Bush's record, Really? Are you proud of his arrest record? Big deal. By the time we graduated from high school, 1/3 of my graduating had been "arrested" for underage drinking while in high school. However, they didn't call it an "arrest" (no miranda rights read, no handcuffs, and no night in jail). The term was "juvenile adjudication". Are you proud of his grandfather's record of selling war materials to Nazi Germany? His More recently, how about his record of running and hiding when the US was actually under attack? He was a target you doofus. That is something to be proud of all right. But that's all old news. Let's talk about the present. How about Bush's vetoing spending money on intel & security? He did no such thing. That might really help fight terrorism, but he nixed it. Lie. How about his record of ignoring... and even falsifying... military casualties? Lie. His record of reducing veteran's benefits? Another lie. How about his record of stonewalling the Sept 11 investigation? Bull****. His record of going on vacation more than any other President, ever? So what. His record of lying about many things, from the Clinton staff vandalizing the White House another lie. Check with the GAO. Their report shows it happened just as he says it happened. to his declaration that he would not use Sept 11th politically? Where'd he say that? How his record of bragging about his foreign policy success, while stabbing his own Secretary of State in the back and driving a wedge between the US and our longest & closest allies? The wedge has been there for some time. I'm glad he just exposed the phonies for what they are...backstabbing ingrates. It must take a supreme effort of the will to be proud of these things. Either that, or you're really a not-so-undercover Socialist agitator who mocks Bush by praising him. If that's the case, as I suspect, then you're overdoing it. I suspect that you couldn't find proof for more than one...maybe two...of your aforementioned allegations. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... Bush *is* the epitome of Crusader evil. He doesn't know what the hell he is doing. He's done nothing at all to make the United States or the world safer. In fact, he's put all of us in a worse position than we've been in since the early days of World War II. And we all know how that conflict turned out! Irrelevant. Like comparing molars to watermelons. Sure it is, Doug. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
) OT ) Bush's "needless war" | General |