"John H" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 20 Mar 2004 14:27:56 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
.. .


How the hell could Bush or the Secret Service have possibly said,
"There is no immediate threat" as long as airplanes were still flying
around the country?

This "Bush was a coward" stuff is totally inane. You folks say it to
keep your lib circle jerk going, but it's ridiculous.

It's a non-issue. They could've simply taken him to Christfield's, an
excellent seafood place in Silver Springs, and he would've been safe.
However, I think he would choked on a lobster claw, so perhaps it *was*
better that they got him onto an airplane.


Thank God for sanity!

John H

I guess. He also could've poked himself in the eye with the lobster tool.

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
news
The locals are in jail, but the financiers and planers
aren't.

You should write to your leader and ask him why he helped the financiers
leave the country so quickly. Nobody likes to discuss that.

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Doug Kanter wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

Doug Kanter wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
...



How the hell could Bush or the Secret Service have possibly said,
"There is no immediate threat" as long as airplanes were still flying
around the country?

This "Bush was a coward" stuff is totally inane. You folks say it to
keep your lib circle jerk going, but it's ridiculous.


It's a non-issue. They could've simply taken him to Christfield's, an
excellent seafood place in Silver Springs, and he would've been safe.
However, I think he would choked on a lobster claw, so perhaps it *was*
better that they got him onto an airplane.



It's Chrisfield's, actually, and I'm pretty sure lobster isn't on the
menu. But Bush could have choked on a "arster" shell.


Why no lobster? Don't they ship any in from up North?


Chrisfeld's tends to specialize in "local" shellfish, such as oysters
and crabs, and sometimes clams. But they do have shrimp, too. There
are plenty of places around that serve lobster.

OK. I was there 10 years back with my grandma. Didn't even think of lobster
at the time. But, the thought of Shrub mismanaging a lobster claw is funny
enough to belong on Saturday Night Live. :-)

In article . net,
says...

"bb" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 22:53:38 GMT, "NOYB" wrote:


A vote for Kerry is victory for al Qaeda.

Run on anything except Bush's record, eh? Nice straw man.

As a Conservative Republican, I'm very proud of Bush's record, and can (and
have) successfully defended it against any partisan attacks.

However, Democrats have decided to turn this election into an "anybody but
Bush" campaign. Well, it's time for Americans to realize the danger of such
a decision.

The "danger" is in keeping Bush. His policies have run their course and
been proven ill-conceived and poorly executed. That's not the kind of
person I want running the country.

Bush's Iraq war has served to foment and focus hatred against the US and
catalyze the anti-American jihad. Spain's vote was a rebuke of war
against the wrong nation on false pretenses as a solution.

You short termers will never understand such complex principles while
simple, illusory solutions are available for your (apparently) ADD
brains.

jps

John H wrote:
This "Bush was a coward" stuff is totally inane. You folks say it to
keep your lib circle jerk going, but it's ridiculous

Umm, yeah, sure. John. You can either say that the President was in
imminent danger, which is BS, or that he was ordered to flee by
underlings, which is pretty much the truth.

Neither changes the fact that on Sept 11th, President George Bush Jr was
a disgrace. He acted like a chicken****. And that's a fact. You don't
like it, tough.

You have pretty much shown that Bush and/or Cheney could **** on your
dinner table and you'd pass the toilet paper and ask which fork to use.
Why should your opinion carry any weight?

DSK

On Sun, 21 Mar 2004 22:13:20 -0500, DSK wrote:

John H wrote:
This "Bush was a coward" stuff is totally inane. You folks say it to
keep your lib circle jerk going, but it's ridiculous

Umm, yeah, sure. John. You can either say that the President was in
imminent danger, which is BS, or that he was ordered to flee by
underlings, which is pretty much the truth.

Neither changes the fact that on Sept 11th, President George Bush Jr was
a disgrace. He acted like a chicken****. And that's a fact. You don't
like it, tough.

You have pretty much shown that Bush and/or Cheney could **** on your
dinner table and you'd pass the toilet paper and ask which fork to use.
Why should your opinion carry any weight?

DSK

Jerk, jerk, jerk, jerk......

This crap throws your credibility in the same pot as Harry's and
b'asskisser's.

John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

Calif Bill wrote:
Run by the same group of ringleaders. And the fact the building did not
collapse was luck.

Luck, and that it was built better than they knew.

As for getting the ringleaders, that's always the illusive goal, isn't
it? Same with the drug war. And for every ringleader that *does* get
caught, there's a huge expensive legal battle to follow, and an eager
(and possibly more dangerously competent) #2 man to fill the shoes.

That is not to say that I think it's a waste of time going after them...
just that it's an order of magnitude (maybe several) more complex &
difficult to find and successfully prosecute them, than it is to get the
operatives & agents.

Meanwhile, it appears that President Bush is having a lack of success at
getting the ringleaders, too. Any comment on that Calif Bill? So far the
only ones he's gaffed are from Iraq... which is pretty much of a
sideshow & a red herring in the war on terrorism.


...The fact they tried and failed actually saved lives on
9/11. There were people who said to stay in the building it was safe and
those that had been through the earlier event, were smart enough to say.
Nah. We're leaving. The locals are in jail, but the financiers and planers
aren't.

A lot of the financiers, and possibly some of the planners, are being
actively shielded by the Bush Administration. Why do *you* think they
are stonewalling the Sept 11th investigation? Why do *you* think that so
many Saudi officials, and the Bin Laden family, were all given free
rides to secure locations? I don't think that BushCo was actually
complicit, I think they just had their heads in the sand because after
all, Clinton getting a blow job was more important... and they are
arrogantly positive that their 'friends' must be above suspicion. In
fact John Ashcroft seems to think it's a point of law.

DSK

John H wrote in message . ..
On Sun, 21 Mar 2004 22:13:20 -0500, DSK wrote:

John H wrote:
This "Bush was a coward" stuff is totally inane. You folks say it to
keep your lib circle jerk going, but it's ridiculous

Umm, yeah, sure. John. You can either say that the President was in
imminent danger, which is BS, or that he was ordered to flee by
underlings, which is pretty much the truth.

Neither changes the fact that on Sept 11th, President George Bush Jr was
a disgrace. He acted like a chicken****. And that's a fact. You don't
like it, tough.

You have pretty much shown that Bush and/or Cheney could **** on your
dinner table and you'd pass the toilet paper and ask which fork to use.
Why should your opinion carry any weight?

DSK

Jerk, jerk, jerk, jerk......

This crap throws your credibility in the same pot as Harry's and
b'asskisser's.

John H


Why would you question MY credibility? You are one of four here that
make wild allegations, assumptions, and statements based on absolutely
NO fact. You John, not me. What would you say about someone's
credibility that makes such statements, and presents them here as
fact?

On 22 Mar 2004 10:42:07 -0800, (basskisser) wrote:

John H wrote in message . ..
On Sun, 21 Mar 2004 22:13:20 -0500, DSK wrote:

John H wrote:
This "Bush was a coward" stuff is totally inane. You folks say it to
keep your lib circle jerk going, but it's ridiculous

Umm, yeah, sure. John. You can either say that the President was in
imminent danger, which is BS, or that he was ordered to flee by
underlings, which is pretty much the truth.

Neither changes the fact that on Sept 11th, President George Bush Jr was
a disgrace. He acted like a chicken****. And that's a fact. You don't
like it, tough.

You have pretty much shown that Bush and/or Cheney could **** on your
dinner table and you'd pass the toilet paper and ask which fork to use.
Why should your opinion carry any weight?

DSK

Jerk, jerk, jerk, jerk......

This crap throws your credibility in the same pot as Harry's and
b'asskisser's.

John H


Why would you question MY credibility? You are one of four here that
make wild allegations, assumptions, and statements based on absolutely
NO fact. You John, not me. What would you say about someone's
credibility that makes such statements, and presents them here as
fact?

Why are you so upset? Did I say something disparaging? What statement
did I make that was so incredulous? My goodness, surely you don't find
anything negative in having your credibility equated with Harry's and
DSK's (and Clarke's while we're at it)!

John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

John H wrote in message . ..
On 22 Mar 2004 10:42:07 -0800, (basskisser) wrote:

John H wrote in message . ..
On Sun, 21 Mar 2004 22:13:20 -0500, DSK wrote:

John H wrote:
This "Bush was a coward" stuff is totally inane. You folks say it to
keep your lib circle jerk going, but it's ridiculous

Umm, yeah, sure. John. You can either say that the President was in
imminent danger, which is BS, or that he was ordered to flee by
underlings, which is pretty much the truth.

Neither changes the fact that on Sept 11th, President George Bush Jr was
a disgrace. He acted like a chicken****. And that's a fact. You don't
like it, tough.

You have pretty much shown that Bush and/or Cheney could **** on your
dinner table and you'd pass the toilet paper and ask which fork to use.
Why should your opinion carry any weight?

DSK

Jerk, jerk, jerk, jerk......

This crap throws your credibility in the same pot as Harry's and
b'asskisser's.

John H


Why would you question MY credibility? You are one of four here that
make wild allegations, assumptions, and statements based on absolutely
NO fact. You John, not me. What would you say about someone's
credibility that makes such statements, and presents them here as
fact?

Why are you so upset? Did I say something disparaging? What statement
did I make that was so incredulous? My goodness, surely you don't find
anything negative in having your credibility equated with Harry's and
DSK's (and Clarke's while we're at it)!

John H

Would you say that someone mentioning someone else's credibility, in
response to "jerk, jerk, jerk, jerk" would be POSITIVE? Now, I'll ask
again. Why would YOU question my credibility? Would you not question
the credibility, instead, of someone who makes wild, unfounded
allegations, assumptions, and statements based on NO fact? And
wouldn't you also question the credibility of someone who makes those
allegations, assumptions, and statements, and knowing that they are
just that, presents them here as truth? That would be you, Jim--, and
Henry.