Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "NOYB" wrote in message ink.net... "bb" wrote in message ... On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 22:53:38 GMT, "NOYB" wrote: A vote for Kerry is victory for al Qaeda. Run on anything except Bush's record, eh? Nice straw man. As a Conservative Republican, I'm very proud of Bush's record, and can (and have) successfully defended it against any partisan attacks. And I'm very proud of the lettuce seedlings in my front window. So what? However, Democrats have decided to turn this election into an "anybody but Bush" campaign. Well, it's time for Americans to realize the danger of such a decision. There is no danger. You need to think this through more thoroughly. It's no secret that al Qaeda would claim a huge victory should Bush be run from office. 1) They can claim whatever the f..k they want, but they know what you don't: Only a moron would draw a connection between the election results and the future of al Qaeda. It'd be terrific propaganda. "By inflicting great harm on America and its allies, we were able to drive the evil Crusader Bush from office." You don't think that would be a terrific recruiting tool? You don't thank that al Qaeda training camps would teach the idea that the West's will can be broken, and its people and elections manipulated through acts of terror? 2) They've claimed a victory in the Spanish elections. Zzzzzzz..... Nobody cares. The terrorist care. The message coming out of all of the terror groups linked to al Qaeda is that the Spanish elections were a great victory for them. It was a morale-booster at a time when al Qaeda desperately needed one. Why do you think that is? Supposedly, according to Democrats, the war on terror is a failure. If you base the quality of the results on whether there's been another attack HERE, then the results have been good. But, only a moron would limit his view to THIS country at this point in time. Iraq is still pretty much a free play zone, and the terrorist kiddies are having a ball. Therefore, that has been a failure. Afghanistan is also a circus, but you won't believe that. Try this: We thought we'd create a nice country that could behave like other nice countries. Just one problem: 60% of their GNP is derived from opium poppies, and there's not a damned thing we can do about it. However, our opponent continues to do everything possible to mar Bush's chances for reelection. If Bush's anti-terror policies were such a failure, the enemy wouldn't be so eager to see him replaced by a liberal Democrat. Let's see if I understand you: If we get a Democratic president, the war ends, the soldiers come home, and all domestic security measures enacted since 9/11 are reversed? Is that what you predict? No. But I do predict an increase in al Qaeda's morale leading to emboldened attacks that result in further appeasement by the West. The end result? al Qaeda controls 2/3 of the World's oil supply, and America undergoes an economic collapse not seen since the Great Depression. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
) OT ) Bush's "needless war" | General |