"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"bb" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 22:53:38 GMT, "NOYB" wrote:


A vote for Kerry is victory for al Qaeda.

Run on anything except Bush's record, eh? Nice straw man.

As a Conservative Republican, I'm very proud of Bush's record, and can
(and
have) successfully defended it against any partisan attacks.

And I'm very proud of the lettuce seedlings in my front window. So what?


However, Democrats have decided to turn this election into an "anybody
but
Bush" campaign. Well, it's time for Americans to realize the danger of
such
a decision.

There is no danger. You need to think this through more thoroughly.


It's no secret that al Qaeda would claim a huge victory should Bush be
run
from office.

1) They can claim whatever the f..k they want, but they know what you
don't:
Only a moron would draw a connection between the election results and the
future of al Qaeda.

It'd be terrific propaganda. "By inflicting great harm on America and its
allies, we were able to drive the evil Crusader Bush from office."

You don't think that would be a terrific recruiting tool? You don't thank
that al Qaeda training camps would teach the idea that the West's will can
be broken, and its people and elections manipulated through acts of terror?



2) They've claimed a victory in the Spanish elections. Zzzzzzz.....
Nobody
cares.

The terrorist care. The message coming out of all of the terror groups
linked to al Qaeda is that the Spanish elections were a great victory for
them. It was a morale-booster at a time when al Qaeda desperately needed
one.



Why do you think that is? Supposedly, according to Democrats,
the war on terror is a failure.

If you base the quality of the results on whether there's been another
attack HERE, then the results have been good. But, only a moron would
limit
his view to THIS country at this point in time. Iraq is still pretty much
a
free play zone, and the terrorist kiddies are having a ball. Therefore,
that
has been a failure. Afghanistan is also a circus, but you won't believe
that. Try this: We thought we'd create a nice country that could behave
like
other nice countries. Just one problem: 60% of their GNP is derived from
opium poppies, and there's not a damned thing we can do about it.


However, our opponent continues to do
everything possible to mar Bush's chances for reelection. If Bush's
anti-terror policies were such a failure, the enemy wouldn't be so eager
to
see him replaced by a liberal Democrat.

Let's see if I understand you: If we get a Democratic president, the war
ends, the soldiers come home, and all domestic security measures enacted
since 9/11 are reversed? Is that what you predict?

No. But I do predict an increase in al Qaeda's morale leading to emboldened
attacks that result in further appeasement by the West. The end result? al
Qaeda controls 2/3 of the World's oil supply, and America undergoes an
economic collapse not seen since the Great Depression.

The terrorist care. The message coming out of all of the terror groups
linked to al Qaeda is that the Spanish elections were a great victory for
them. It was a morale-booster at a time when al Qaeda desperately needed
one.

Al Qaeda is no longer the same entity it was in the past, nor does it need
to be. You really need to listen to more news sources. I've told you this
before. When your knowledge has as much depth as a saltine cracker, you
sound like a fool. The terrorists rounded up in Spain appear to be
associated with a me-too group from Morocco. AQ may cheer, but it seems they
had little to do with the train bombing. Similar to the situation in Israel
where multiple groups raise their hands and take credit for the latest
suicide bombing.

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

The terrorist care. The message coming out of all of the terror groups
linked to al Qaeda is that the Spanish elections were a great victory
for
them. It was a morale-booster at a time when al Qaeda desperately
needed
one.

Al Qaeda is no longer the same entity it was in the past, nor does it need
to be. You really need to listen to more news sources. I've told you this
before. When your knowledge has as much depth as a saltine cracker, you
sound like a fool. The terrorists rounded up in Spain appear to be
associated with a me-too group from Morocco. AQ may cheer, but it seems
they
had little to do with the train bombing.

Like every other news story out there, I wrote: "...the terror groups
*linked* to al Qaeda".

Are you claiming that Abu Hafs al-Masri has no affiliations with al Qaeda?

On Fri, 19 Mar 2004 19:07:53 +0000, NOYB wrote:


Are you claiming that Abu Hafs al-Masri has no affiliations with al Qaeda?

Well, his daughter is married to bin Laden's son.