Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
OT National Geographic - favourite tourism sites
"Calif Bill" wrote in message
hlink.net... "Don White" wrote in message ... Where's Nobby?....... As reported in today's newspaper... A survey of industry experts in the March edition of 'National Geographic Traveler' has Cape Breton, Nova Scotia as the second top spot in the world to visit. That's right...second only to the Norwegian fiords. No mention of the 'Gulf Coast of Florida'. see *** http://www.herald.ns.ca/stories/2004...ia225.raw.html *** How come I never see a lot of tourist dollars becing cited for Nova Scotia? Where do you look? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
OT National Geographic - favourite tourism sites
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "Calif Bill" wrote in message hlink.net... "Don White" wrote in message ... Where's Nobby?....... As reported in today's newspaper... A survey of industry experts in the March edition of 'National Geographic Traveler' has Cape Breton, Nova Scotia as the second top spot in the world to visit. That's right...second only to the Norwegian fiords. No mention of the 'Gulf Coast of Florida'. see *** http://www.herald.ns.ca/stories/2004...ia225.raw.html *** How come I never see a lot of tourist dollars becing cited for Nova Scotia? Where do you look? Lots of places. Magazines, newspapers. As I like to travel. Bay of Fundy is on the short list, and we are looking at Galapago's in January. Bill |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
OT National Geographic - favourite tourism sites
"Calif Bill" wrote in message hlink.net... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "Calif Bill" wrote in message hlink.net... "Don White" wrote in message ... Where's Nobby?....... As reported in today's newspaper... A survey of industry experts in the March edition of 'National Geographic Traveler' has Cape Breton, Nova Scotia as the second top spot in the world to visit. That's right...second only to the Norwegian fiords. No mention of the 'Gulf Coast of Florida'. see *** http://www.herald.ns.ca/stories/2004...ia225.raw.html *** How come I never see a lot of tourist dollars becing cited for Nova Scotia? Where do you look? Lots of places. Magazines, newspapers. As I like to travel. Bay of Fundy is on the short list, and we are looking at Galapago's in January. Bill The Galapago's are great.....was there last April. Wish I would have done the 7/8 days instead of the 4/5. Take lots of film, or lots of memory for the digital. I was disappointed with the NG article, it seemed to rate highly places people don't often go, and downgraded more popular places simply because of their popularity, and not how they managed the numbers. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Galapago's
"P.Fritz" wrote in message The Galapago's are great.....was there last April. Wish I would have done the 7/8 days instead of the 4/5. Take lots of film, or lots of memory for the digital. I was disappointed with the NG article, it seemed to rate highly places people don't often go, and downgraded more popular places simply because of their popularity, and not how they managed the numbers. Who did you go with and a cost range? Did you like the tour company and what size boat? Thanks, Bill |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Galapago's
The main tour operator was Far and Wide, which went bankrupt last June. The
local operator was very good, I forget the name offhand, it was something related to the Equador.....(the one in Peru was Condor) , but can look it up. I'm not sure what the cost of the Galapagos portion was, it was part of a 3 week vacation.......week in Peru, week in Equador, and a week in Brazil. The boat had about 40 cabins, but was only about half full. Even on that size boat, almost everyone The food and service were excellant, and the naturalists were outstanding. Unlike other cruise ships, there was not much night life, because you are really beat by the end of the day. I can get further info if you wish.....it was a couple of vacations ago..........it was a good year economically :-) "Calif Bill" wrote in message hlink.net... "P.Fritz" wrote in message The Galapago's are great.....was there last April. Wish I would have done the 7/8 days instead of the 4/5. Take lots of film, or lots of memory for the digital. I was disappointed with the NG article, it seemed to rate highly places people don't often go, and downgraded more popular places simply because of their popularity, and not how they managed the numbers. Who did you go with and a cost range? Did you like the tour company and what size boat? Thanks, Bill |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Galapago's
"P.Fritz" wrote in message ... The main tour operator was Far and Wide, which went bankrupt last June. The local operator was very good, I forget the name offhand, it was something related to the Equador.....(the one in Peru was Condor) , but can look it up. I'm not sure what the cost of the Galapagos portion was, it was part of a 3 week vacation.......week in Peru, week in Equador, and a week in Brazil. The boat had about 40 cabins, but was only about half full. Even on that size boat, almost everyone The food and service were excellant, and the naturalists were outstanding. Unlike other cruise ships, there was not much night life, because you are really beat by the end of the day. I can get further info if you wish.....it was a couple of vacations ago..........it was a good year economically :-) "Calif Bill" wrote in message hlink.net... "P.Fritz" wrote in message The Galapago's are great.....was there last April. Wish I would have done the 7/8 days instead of the 4/5. Take lots of film, or lots of memory for the digital. I was disappointed with the NG article, it seemed to rate highly places people don't often go, and downgraded more popular places simply because of their popularity, and not how they managed the numbers. Who did you go with and a cost range? Did you like the tour company and what size boat? Thanks, Bill Thanks. I am looking at the 16 passenger ships. As to Condor in Peru, I used them for Machu Pichu in 2000. Fantastic people to tour with. At least the Cusco and MP part. Bill |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Galapago's
"Calif Bill" wrote in message link.net... "P.Fritz" wrote in message ... The main tour operator was Far and Wide, which went bankrupt last June. The local operator was very good, I forget the name offhand, it was something related to the Equador.....(the one in Peru was Condor) , but can look it up. I'm not sure what the cost of the Galapagos portion was, it was part of a 3 week vacation.......week in Peru, week in Equador, and a week in Brazil. The boat had about 40 cabins, but was only about half full. Even on that size boat, almost everyone The food and service were excellant, and the naturalists were outstanding. Unlike other cruise ships, there was not much night life, because you are really beat by the end of the day. I can get further info if you wish.....it was a couple of vacations ago..........it was a good year economically :-) "Calif Bill" wrote in message hlink.net... "P.Fritz" wrote in message The Galapago's are great.....was there last April. Wish I would have done the 7/8 days instead of the 4/5. Take lots of film, or lots of memory for the digital. I was disappointed with the NG article, it seemed to rate highly places people don't often go, and downgraded more popular places simply because of their popularity, and not how they managed the numbers. Who did you go with and a cost range? Did you like the tour company and what size boat? Thanks, Bill Thanks. I am looking at the 16 passenger ships. As to Condor in Peru, I used them for Machu Pichu in 2000. Fantastic people to tour with. At least the Cusco and MP part. Bill That was part of this trip as well, Where did you stay in Cusco and Machu Pichu? What did you think of the approach and landing for the Cusco airport? The ship we were on was the Santa Cruz. (my daughter remembered the name.) Some of those small boats looked a little scary. I was thankful being on a larger boat the night we moved from one end of the island chain to the other.....going against the current/wind......it was the only time in my life I have ever had any motion sickness. And the flight to and from the islands were in what appeared to be very old 727's. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
OT National Geographic - favourite tourism sites
"Calif Bill" wrote in message
hlink.net... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "Calif Bill" wrote in message hlink.net... "Don White" wrote in message ... Where's Nobby?....... As reported in today's newspaper... A survey of industry experts in the March edition of 'National Geographic Traveler' has Cape Breton, Nova Scotia as the second top spot in the world to visit. That's right...second only to the Norwegian fiords. No mention of the 'Gulf Coast of Florida'. see *** http://www.herald.ns.ca/stories/2004...ia225.raw.html *** How come I never see a lot of tourist dollars becing cited for Nova Scotia? Where do you look? Lots of places. Magazines, newspapers. As I like to travel. Bay of Fundy is on the short list, and we are looking at Galapago's in January. Bill Maybe Nova Scotia doesn't need publicity to attract visitors. The Adirondacks in NY State is like that. 75% repeat customers, year after year. Same with Toronto. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
OT National Geographic - favourite tourism sites
Doug Kanter wrote in message ... Maybe Nova Scotia doesn't need publicity to attract visitors. The Adirondacks in NY State is like that. 75% repeat customers, year after year. Same with Toronto. There's always room for one more tourist dollar. I believe most of the advertising is focused on the New England area because of it's closeness. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
OT National Geographic - favourite tourism sites
"Don White" wrote in message
... Doug Kanter wrote in message ... Maybe Nova Scotia doesn't need publicity to attract visitors. The Adirondacks in NY State is like that. 75% repeat customers, year after year. Same with Toronto. There's always room for one more tourist dollar. I believe most of the advertising is focused on the New England area because of it's closeness. Not only that, but its proximity too. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
OT--Not again! More Chinese money buying our politicians. | General |