You noticed that also? ;-)

"The real ME" wrote in message
...
Wayne,
Are you accusing Gould of stalking JimH looking for opportunities to make
snide comments?


"Wayne.B" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 15 Apr 2005 13:09:48 -0400, "The real ME"
wrote:

Gould,

I am glad you and I are above all of this.

=================================

If only it were true...

"The real ME" wrote in message
...
Harry,
You keep repeating the same lie over and over again hoping someone will
believe them. Please provide me with one post where I stole anyone's
identity. I would assume you either mean identity theft as defined by the
law, or I copied someone nickname and email address in an effort to get
someone to believe I was someone else, who made a post in rec.boats.

Either way, I am not guilty of either.



"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...
The real ME wrote:
Harry,

I am going to type this slowly to help you understand it. If you owned
a
boat, it would not matter if it was a bet or not. You would walk away
with the exact same amount of money.


Sorry...this is as far in your post as I got.

Gosh...I'm being "whipsawed" by "Smithers" and "Netsock" in the same
day.
The horror of it. I've got two identity thieves after me at the same
time.

LOL! You're claiming I'm an identity thief? Now that's funny.

Again, you not only prove yourself a liar, but your ignorance as well. It is
obvious you don't even know what true identity theft is.

I'm off tomorrow to break out one of my REAL boats. Getting her ready for
some REAL water.

--
-Netsock

"It's just about going fast...that's all..."
http://home.columbus.rr.com/ckg/

"Netsock" wrote in message
...

"The real ME" wrote in message
...
Harry,
You keep repeating the same lie over and over again hoping someone will
believe them. Please provide me with one post where I stole anyone's
identity. I would assume you either mean identity theft as defined by
the
law, or I copied someone nickname and email address in an effort to get
someone to believe I was someone else, who made a post in rec.boats.

Either way, I am not guilty of either.



"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...
The real ME wrote:
Harry,

I am going to type this slowly to help you understand it. If you
owned
a
boat, it would not matter if it was a bet or not. You would walk away
with the exact same amount of money.


Sorry...this is as far in your post as I got.

Gosh...I'm being "whipsawed" by "Smithers" and "Netsock" in the same
day.
The horror of it. I've got two identity thieves after me at the same
time.

LOL! You're claiming I'm an identity thief? Now that's funny.

Again, you not only prove yourself a liar, but your ignorance as well. It
is
obvious you don't even know what true identity theft is.

I'm off tomorrow to break out one of my REAL boats. Getting her ready for
some REAL water.

--
-Netsock

"It's just about going fast...that's all..."
http://home.columbus.rr.com/ckg/



Harry will be doing some spring cleaning of his own tomorrow....vacuuming
the cheese doodle crumbs off his key board in preparation for a new season
on rec.boats.

The real ME wrote:
Wayne,
Are you accusing Gould of stalking JimH looking for opportunities to make
snide comments?


That's a laugh! You wouldn't have to look far or long. JimH presents
opportunities day & night. You should be congratulating Chuck for his
restraint.

JimH wrote:

I understand.

I snipped the remainder of your personal attack Chuck. I see no point
in
discussing this with you any further.


***************

Personal attack?

What a bizarre comment.

I described my own f'd up behavior, specifically exempted you from any
implication that you
behaved in a similar manner, and you interpret that as a "personal
attack"?

Why would you, or anybody else, figure that the behavior I castigated
and described as my own was actually representing that of another
person?

Beats the heck out of me, I mean there would have to be some evidence
or something that would put the lie to my specific assertions that
others, and you specifically, were *not* guilty of the same. I'm sure
that you and I would agree that there isn't any evidence, correct?

You have an odd definintion of a personal attack, I must say.

wrote in message
ups.com...
JimH wrote:

I understand.

I snipped the remainder of your personal attack Chuck. I see no point
in
discussing this with you any further.


***************

Personal attack?

What a bizarre comment.

I described my own f'd up behavior, specifically exempted you from any
implication that you
behaved in a similar manner, and you interpret that as a "personal
attack"?

Why would you, or anybody else, figure that the behavior I castigated
and described as my own was actually representing that of another
person?

Beats the heck out of me, I mean there would have to be some evidence
or something that would put the lie to my specific assertions that
others, and you specifically, were *not* guilty of the same. I'm sure
that you and I would agree that there isn't any evidence, correct?

You have an odd definintion of a personal attack, I must say.


To every thread,
You spin, spin, spin
Without any reason
You spin, spin, spin
And to all of us in this NG
It is obvious.

(Sing to the harmony of Turn, Turn, Turn by the Byrds)

Stranger still.........

You read something into a post that was clearly not stated.

When I clarify that what you are complaining about is clearly not
stated, you then shift into
"spin, spin, spin"?

Would you be just all around happier if I agreed that my self criticism
was a personal attack?

You still have not addressed the central question, JimH- why would
anybody suspect that my self criticism was a personal attack?

Sing all you like. Hope you carry a tune better than you do an
argument. :-)

Gould,

I have a confession to make. I am a self-absorbed individual who has failed
at numerous endeavors, selling cars, boats now as a free-lance writer.
Sometimes I feel like I have failed in everything I have tried. What
bothers me the most, is I think I might have been successful if I could have
set objectives and followed them. Instead, I just frittered away my time,
wandering from one job to another, changing jobs and careers as often as
some change underwear. When I look into the mirror I see an old man
balding, with a beard who is at the end of his life, and is still trying to
find myself. I am a pathetic human being, who feels he could have been a
contender, but now am just a failure.

I feel much better for making that confession.




wrote in message
oups.com...
Stranger still.........

You read something into a post that was clearly not stated.

When I clarify that what you are complaining about is clearly not
stated, you then shift into
"spin, spin, spin"?

Would you be just all around happier if I agreed that my self criticism
was a personal attack?

You still have not addressed the central question, JimH- why would
anybody suspect that my self criticism was a personal attack?

Sing all you like. Hope you carry a tune better than you do an
argument. :-)

On Fri, 15 Apr 2005, HarryKrause wrote:
Jeff Rigby wrote:
HarryKrause says:


It doesn't matter who this new buttwipe is, whether he is another
"Smothers" variant, a Netsock variant, a Hertvik variant. a Fritz variant,
a Tuuk variant. They're all the same. Just filter all the right-wing
idiots out, and be done with them.

I don't care who they are. To me, they're all Smitherscum, even if they're
not. What difference does it make? They're all here to do the same thing,
and they all deserve the same treatment...a silent trip to the dumpster,
where they can reside with the rest of the garbage.



Here to do the same thing?? Yes to correct the blatent misrepresentation of
facts.

Lies (distorting facts) are one of the most henious crimes committed against
the young. They have no sense of history to pick out the lies and they
incorporate the misinformation into their world view.

Even Republican politicions when they try to make a point, do it by omission
not by distorting the facts.



**** OFF ASSSHOLE SPAMMER. This is rec.boats. Your post has nothing to do
with boats. You are a TROLL!


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header
is unverified. You need a valid hashcash token to post to groups other
than alt.test and alt.anonymous.messages. Visit www.panta-rhei.dyndns.org
for abuse and hashcash info.

tell me.....what are the drivetrain specs. on a zimmerman 36???