(Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message ...
On Mon, 22 Mar 2004 02:17:14 GMT, Joe Parsons
wrote:

On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 22:33:18 GMT, (Steven Shelikoff) wrote:

On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 22:17:32 GMT, Joe Parsons
wrote:

On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 18:01:00 GMT, "Calif Bill"
wrote:
Seems as if in the past, basskisser, stated he grew the dreaded weed. So,
would be a pretty safe assumption he smoked it, or he is farming for profit.

A couple of little flaws there, neighbor:

First, you'd have to show that basskisser made such an admission (he hasn't, so
far as I can determine). Second, IF the first statement were true (and that's

http://www.google.com/groups?selm=8q...nnrp1.deja.com

Relevance?

Um, I thought it was obvious. Why are you asking for relevance? You
said: "First, you'd have to show that basskisser made such an admission
(he hasn't, so far as I can determine). "

That post is where he admitted it.

Steve

I state in that post that I smoke pot? No, you are wrong.

On 22 Mar 2004 04:30:00 -0800, (basskisser) wrote:

(Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message ...
On Mon, 22 Mar 2004 02:17:14 GMT, Joe Parsons
wrote:

On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 22:33:18 GMT, (Steven Shelikoff) wrote:

On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 22:17:32 GMT, Joe Parsons
wrote:

On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 18:01:00 GMT, "Calif Bill"
wrote:
Seems as if in the past, basskisser, stated he grew the dreaded weed. So,
would be a pretty safe assumption he smoked it, or he is farming for profit.

A couple of little flaws there, neighbor:

First, you'd have to show that basskisser made such an admission (he hasn't, so
far as I can determine). Second, IF the first statement were true (and that's

http://www.google.com/groups?selm=8q...nnrp1.deja.com

Relevance?

Um, I thought it was obvious. Why are you asking for relevance? You
said: "First, you'd have to show that basskisser made such an admission
(he hasn't, so far as I can determine). "

That post is where he admitted it.

I state in that post that I smoke pot? No, you are wrong.

No, you state in the post that you grow pot, which is the "First" part
of Joe's post.

Steve

(Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message ...
On 22 Mar 2004 04:30:00 -0800, (basskisser) wrote:

(Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message ...
On Mon, 22 Mar 2004 02:17:14 GMT, Joe Parsons
wrote:

On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 22:33:18 GMT, (Steven Shelikoff) wrote:

On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 22:17:32 GMT, Joe Parsons
wrote:

On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 18:01:00 GMT, "Calif Bill"
wrote:
Seems as if in the past, basskisser, stated he grew the dreaded weed. So,
would be a pretty safe assumption he smoked it, or he is farming for profit.

A couple of little flaws there, neighbor:

First, you'd have to show that basskisser made such an admission (he hasn't, so
far as I can determine). Second, IF the first statement were true (and that's

http://www.google.com/groups?selm=8q...nnrp1.deja.com

Relevance?

Um, I thought it was obvious. Why are you asking for relevance? You
said: "First, you'd have to show that basskisser made such an admission
(he hasn't, so far as I can determine). "

That post is where he admitted it.

I state in that post that I smoke pot? No, you are wrong.

No, you state in the post that you grow pot, which is the "First" part
of Joe's post.

Steve

Wrong AGAIN!!! I said I've GROWN pot. Didn't ever say that I'm growing
it now. You are buying into the dumb asses that think because they
assume things, and make wild allegations, that those allegations
become true.

In article , (basskisser) wrote:

(Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message
...
On 22 Mar 2004 04:30:00 -0800, (basskisser) wrote:

(Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message
...
On Mon, 22 Mar 2004 02:17:14 GMT, Joe Parsons
wrote:

On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 22:33:18 GMT, (Steven Shelikoff)
wrote:

On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 22:17:32 GMT, Joe Parsons
wrote:

On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 18:01:00 GMT, "Calif Bill"

wrote:
Seems as if in the past, basskisser, stated he grew the dreaded weed.
So,
would be a pretty safe assumption he smoked it, or he is farming for
profit.

A couple of little flaws there, neighbor:

First, you'd have to show that basskisser made such an admission (he
hasn't, so
far as I can determine). Second, IF the first statement were true (and
that's

http://www.google.com/groups?selm=8q...nnrp1.deja.com

Relevance?

Um, I thought it was obvious. Why are you asking for relevance? You
said: "First, you'd have to show that basskisser made such an admission
(he hasn't, so far as I can determine). "

That post is where he admitted it.

I state in that post that I smoke pot? No, you are wrong.

No, you state in the post that you grow pot, which is the "First" part
of Joe's post.

Steve

Wrong AGAIN!!! I said I've GROWN pot. Didn't ever say that I'm growing
it now. You are buying into the dumb asses that think because they
assume things, and make wild allegations, that those allegations
become true.

Kind of like the Democrats?