BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)
-   -   Fuel consumption for Pro-line 211? (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/33531-fuel-consumption-pro-line-211-a.html)

John H April 14th 05 12:10 PM

On the way, over!


On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 22:40:47 GMT, Dan Krueger
wrote:

John,

Your email address was the same as you use here. Please send it again
and I will reply tomorrow.

Dan


John H wrote:
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 23:52:24 GMT, Dan Krueger
wrote:


John,

I've got a spare - brand new, in the box, and all manuals. Email me
(minus the XXX) and I'll make you a great deal. I would send this
directly but your email address is probably not going to work! Same
deal for anyone else but John gets the first shot at it. I would post a
price but that would be ... spam.

Dan


John H wrote:


On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 00:19:46 GMT, Dan Krueger
wrote:



http://www.standardhorizon.com/index...7&DivisionID=3

or

http://floscan.com/ModelSelection/Pricing.asp

Dan

John H wrote:



On Sun, 10 Apr 2005 15:09:55 -0400, Ed wrote:




Harry is correct.... Also.. If you use your boat a lot then it will
probably pay for itself in a year or two.... I had a pair of 454's in a
Phoenix 33 and it was an eye opener.... found out for that boat, I had
to push it a bit past optimum cruise RPM (Per crusader) to get the best
fuel economy. It also helped me justify the new Cummins 370s I put in
the boat two years later....

Harry Krause wrote:



John H wrote:




On Sun, 10 Apr 2005 02:29:07 GMT, "tony thomas"
wrote:





Agreed for that situation. But would it not be more fair to start
out full of fuel and then top off when you get back. That way you
know exactly how much you burned.



That would be more accurate, if I wanted to take the time to do so
every time I
go out. But, I don't.


For under $150, you can install a fuel-flow meter and be done with it.
You can probably install it yourself.



Thanks, I didn't see Harry's response to my post (he's filtered). Every year I
consider flow meters, but never do anything about it. Maybe this year I'll break
down and do something. But then I have to figure out where to put the gauge. Not
a lot of places to do it on my console. Any recommendations as to type?



Thanks, Dan. I like the looks of the Standard Horizon meter. I'll have to check
it out.



Hey Dan. An email is on its way to you, without the x's.

Thanks!


--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

LD April 15th 05 12:47 AM

I second your opinion! Mpg is much more important than gph.
Taking the chart one step further--adding the conversion for mpg we have:

RPM MPH Knots GPH MPG
650 3.7 3.2 0.9 4.1
1000 5.8 5.0 1.2 4.8
1500 8.1 7.0 3.4 2.3
2000 15.6 13.6 5.1 3.1
2500 24.4 21.2 6.0 4.1
3000 31.7 27.6 8.2 3.9
3500 39.6 34.4 11.8 3.4
4000 45.3 39.4 13.5 3.4
4500 49.9 43.3 17.2 2.9
4750 54.1 47.0 22.6 2.4



I wish I got such great "economy"! I average only about 2mpg with my 200hp
merc.
I usually run 3/4 throttle (35-40mph) for 9miles to the pass then troll or
run as fast as I
can safely and comfortably go to a bottom fishing spot. My boat has twin
18gal and a
third 17gal tank and consistantly, with a mix of trolling and crusing gets
between 1.9 to 2.1 mpg.
I keep a log with fishing, weather info and how much gas I put in. Maybe to
determine
the overall running time on the engine an hour meter is good but I could
care less about
how many gallons it takes me to move for one hour. Once I've commited to go
fishing,
I just want to be sure I have plenty of gas to get back! In the example
it's obvious that at 1500 rpm the boat's trying to get on plane and at
2500rpm it's on plane and
that WFO is inefficient (and not too good on the engine life either).
Notice that, once it's on plane
at 24.4mph it's as efficient as creeping along at 3.7mph. But within the
parameters of 3.7mph
to 45.3 mph (avoiding the 1500 rpm), there's not much difference. And, in
the example,
is one really going to run 5.8 mph for 30 miles just for economy? If I run
any distance at 3.7 or 5.8
mph it's because I trolling--not trying to save gas. If I really wanted to
save gas
I guess I'd get a sailboat! Let's go fish!
LD

"tony thomas" wrote in message
news:QOY5e.1364$xL4.780@attbi_s72...
On average you will get between 2.5 and 3.0 miles per gallon. This

assumes
you are running on plane and are running between 3000 and 4000 rpms. The
lower the rpms the better the mileage.

Everyone wants to quote gallons per hour at a certain rpm. How many hours
do you run at the same rpm? Miles per gallon means so much more as you
should know how far you have gone using either a chart or a gps. This

will
tell you exactly how far you can still go on a given amount of fuel.

Of course that is my opinion.
--
Tony
my boats and cars at http://t.thomas.home.mchsi.com


"John H" wrote in message
...
Does anyone have something that will tell me what the fuel consumption
expectations are for a Pro-line 211 walkaround with a 5.7L carbureted
engine?

It's listed in the Powerboat Guide, which I'm too cheap to buy just to

get
this
question answered.

I'm also too cheap to put a fuel meter on it.

Actually, I'm so cheap I may not burn the electricity to turn this
computer on
to get an answer....but I'll love you if you try.

Thanks!
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."







All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:28 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com