Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peggie, if you were outfitting a boat for serious cruising, with
reliability and ease of maintenance important concerns, what type of head would you choose? Sorry, but manually operated is not an option. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wayne.B wrote:
Peggie, if you were outfitting a boat for serious cruising, with reliability and ease of maintenance important concerns, what type of head would you choose? Sorry, but manually operated is not an option. There is no "one size fits all" answer to your question...it depends on your budget, the amount of space in your head, whether you want to use sea water or pressurized fresh flush water, whether flush water volume is a concern (holding tank size, or whether you can also use a treatment device...etc. I need more information before I can recommend a toilet. -- Peggie ---------- Peggie Hall Specializing in marine sanitation since 1987 Author "Get Rid of Boat Odors - A Guide To Marine Sanitation Systems and Other Sources of Aggravation and Odor" http://www.seaworthy.com/html/get_ri...oat_odors.html |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 20 Mar 2004 19:30:56 GMT, Peggie Hall
wrote: Wayne.B wrote: Peggie, if you were outfitting a boat for serious cruising, with reliability and ease of maintenance important concerns, what type of head would you choose? Sorry, but manually operated is not an option. There is no "one size fits all" answer to your question...it depends on your budget, the amount of space in your head, whether you want to use sea water or pressurized fresh flush water, whether flush water volume is a concern (holding tank size, or whether you can also use a treatment device...etc. I need more information before I can recommend a toilet. ================================================== === The boat is most likely to be a Hatteras 53 Classic or Yacht Fish. They have decent sized heads but not enormous. They also have a good sized holding tank in the 200 gallon range if my memory is correct. The choice between fresh water and sea water is not all that important to me but all other things being equal, I'd probably pick salt water. In the interest of simplicity and reliability, I'd probably not choose a treatment device. My first priorities are reliability, and ease of maintenance if something does go wrong. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wayne.B wrote:
They have decent sized heads but not enormous. They also have a good sized holding tank in the 200 gallon range if my memory is correct. The choice between fresh water and sea water is not all that important to me but all other things being equal, I'd probably pick salt water. In that case, I recommend the Raritan SeaEra--very basic, exceptionally durable and trouble-free macerating electric toilet. It's available in both raw water and pressurized flush water versions. Pressurized flush water is simpler...no intake pump, which means no impellers to fail because someone forgot to open the seacock. Also eliminates odor from stagnant sea water trapped in the head intake AND sea water cacium carbonate buildup in the hoses. In the interest of simplicity and reliability, I'd probably not choose a treatment device. My first priorities are reliability, and ease of maintenance if something does go wrong. IMO, you have it backwards...a Lectra/San requires far LESS maintenance than a holding tank--no vents to keep clear, no need for any odor elimination management...no sludge buildup...no macerator pump with an impeller that can fail at sea when the tank is full because you either haven't changed it in 5 years or forgot to turn it off as soon as the tank was empty. The only maintenance a Lectra/San needs to keep running reliably for about 20 years is a solution of muriatic acid according to directions once or twice a year. -- Peggie ---------- Peggie Hall Specializing in marine sanitation since 1987 Author "Get Rid of Boat Odors - A Guide To Marine Sanitation Systems and Other Sources of Aggravation and Odor" http://www.seaworthy.com/html/get_ri...oat_odors.html |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 22 Mar 2004 03:55:27 GMT, Peggie Hall
wrote: IMO, you have it backwards...a Lectra/San requires far LESS maintenance than a holding tank--no vents to keep clear, no need for any odor elimination management...no sludge buildup...no macerator pump with an impeller that can fail at sea when the tank is full because you either haven't changed it in 5 years or forgot to turn it off as soon as the tank was empty. The only maintenance a Lectra/San needs to keep running reliably for about 20 years is a solution of muriatic acid according to directions once or twice a year. ================================== Peggie, thanks for the reply. I was under the impression, perhaps incorrectly, that a holding tank was still required for the output of the Lectra/San in order to comply with no discharge areas. Is that incorrect? |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Wayne.B wrote: On Mon, 22 Mar 2004 03:55:27 GMT, Peggie Hall wrote: IMO, you have it backwards...a Lectra/San requires far LESS maintenance than a holding tank--no vents to keep clear, no need for any odor elimination management...no sludge buildup...no macerator pump with an impeller that can fail at sea when the tank is full because you either haven't changed it in 5 years or forgot to turn it off as soon as the tank was empty. The only maintenance a Lectra/San needs to keep running reliably for about 20 years is a solution of muriatic acid according to directions once or twice a year. ================================== Peggie, thanks for the reply. I was under the impression, perhaps incorrectly, that a holding tank was still required for the output of the Lectra/San in order to comply with no discharge areas. Is that incorrect? You're correct that waste must go into a tank in "no discharge" waters. However, whether it's been treated first is irrelevant...once waste goes into a tank, it's no longer considered treated waste. The real question is, how likely are you to ever be in any "no discharge" waters? Contrary to what many believe, 90% of US coastal waters are not. Except for some small harbors, there are none between RI and the FL Keys on the east coast, none north of Santa Barbara on the west coast, and only Destin Harbor in the Gulf. So unless you plan to put the boat on the Great Lakes--which are all totally "no discharge," eliminating the choice of installing anything but a holding tank--or in SoCal, RI or MA, it would be wise to have at least a small tank in addition to a Lectra/San, but it's unlikely that you'll use it much, if at all. -- Peggie ---------- Peggie Hall Specializing in marine sanitation since 1987 Author "Get Rid of Boat Odors - A Guide To Marine Sanitation Systems and Other Sources of Aggravation and Odor" http://www.seaworthy.com/html/get_ri...oat_odors.html |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Ping: Peggie Hall | General | |||
Peggie, question | General | |||
Winterizing question plus. | General | |||
Exhaust question on inboard 1958 Chris Craft | General | |||
Transom Height - Dumb Question Alert | General |