John H wrote:
Chuck wrote:

"JimH is right. Leave the guy alone. We should take personal feuds off
the NG table completely......but if we did, we'd lose about a half
dozen "participants" who hang out here for no other reason than to
pitch crap at specific individuals. We might lose one or two just
recently feigning an interest in boating related topics to try and
obscure the fact that they have hung out here for years with for no
other reason than to pitch crap at specific individuals. I'm sure JimH
would join me in agreeing that the loss of any of these folks would be
no loss at all."

Sounds like a great idea to me. Who'll sign up for Chuck's idea of taking
personal feuds off the NG? Tuuk, Fritz, Basskisser, Karen, etc., etc. ???



Have you lost your mind John???

This spamming OT BS'ter Gould has tried this many times over the years
so he can post more deceptive sales spam, start more OT political posts
& try to BS his way around the NG as he does in life, as for Krause he's
a dangerous article. Nothing but bullies.

Sorry John nice thought & all I think you've been taken in "again". How
many 10s of thousands had to die last time we tried appeasement with the
Krauses of this world?? They're so stupid they only get the picture when
you bomb the b'jeesus out of 'em & expose them for what they are.

So you appease them all you like John but sorry I don't kowtow to
anyone much less these lying idiots.

Anyway I guess you can mark me down as a "maybe"???:-)

K

Been busy today so I'll keep the Krause lie of the day short.

This lying simpleton, after it became clear he was losing a thread
where he was displaying his usual lack of patriotism much less gratitude
for the brave men & women out there risking their everything, to keep
the likes of him safe, he just reverts to type.

But seriously can you imagine this uneducated union thug now claims
he is reviewing universities!!! & wait for it he poo poos the
engineering course!!! this from a lying uneducated union thug who
couldn't use a toaster without a union authorised electrician in attendance.

I've included just one of the followup responses but it was such a
bald faced lie it even embarrassed the rejoinders:-)


I have visited West Point, the Naval Academy, the Air Force Academy and
the sub training facility at Groton. Some years ago, I actually did look
over descriptions of some of the course material at Annapolis and the
c.v.'s of some of the faculty. I'm sure the engineering course material
is fairly rigorous, though it is more "trade-oriented" and did not look
up to MIT or CalTech standards. I mean, if your goal is to be an
aeronautical engineer, you're going to get better training at MIT or
CalTech or at any of a large number of other engineering schools. I
thought the faculty academic credentials no better than what is found at
a typical smaller four year public university. The military academies
turn out military officers with an education, not highly educated
military officers. But that is their purpose, eh?



--


Holy molly, grandma, put on your high boots.


Harry Krause, admitted graduate in the humanities with a degree in
English
is hereby qualified to critique the engineering curriculum of not
only West
Point, but also that of the Naval Academy and the Air Force Academy and
compare it to that of MIT and CalTech.


The above paragraph is a classic.


You missed your calling Harry.