Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Which candidate....
will Al-Qaeda support?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Which candidate....
I dunno about al-Qaeda...but Kerry is reaching out to the Iranians for their
support. I guess he figures that if Iran sends enough insurgents into Iraq to bloody enough of our troops, then our country will elect him to deal with the problem. What a scumbag. Read: February 12, 2004 No.661 Iranian News Agency Alleges Presidential Candidate John Kerry Sends Email Message According to an article published in the Tehran Times, the office of U.S. Senator and leading Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry sent an email message to the Mehr News Agency . The following is the article as it appeared in English : [1] "The office of Senator John Kerry, the frontrunner in the Democratic presidential primary in the U.S., sent the Mehr News Agency an email saying that Kerry will try to repair the damage done by the incumbent president if he wins the election. The text of the e-mail follows: "'As Americans who have lived and worked extensively overseas, we have personally witnessed the high regard with which people around the world have historically viewed the United States. Sadly, we are also painfully aware of how the actions and the attitudes demonstrated by the U.S. government over the past three years have threatened the goodwill earned by presidents of both parties over many decades and put many of our international relationships at risk. "'It is in the urgent interests of the people of the United States to restore our country's credibility in the eyes of the world. America needs the kind of leadership that will repair alliances with countries on every continent that have been so damaged in the past few years, as well as build new friendships and overcome tensions with others. "'We are convinced that John Kerry is the candidate best qualified to meet this challenge. Senator Kerry has the diplomatic skill and temperament as well as a lifetime of accomplishments in [the] field of international affairs. He believes that collaboration with other countries is crucial to efforts to win the war on terror and make America safer. "'An understanding of global affairs is essential in these times, and central to this campaign. Kerry has the experience and the understanding necessary to successfully restore the United States to its position of respect within the community of nations. He has the judgment and vision necessary to assure that the United States fulfills a leadership role in meeting the challenges we face throughout the world. "'The current Administration's policies of unilateralism and rejection of important international initiatives, from the Kyoto Accords to the Biological Weapons Convention, have alienated much of the world and squandered remarkable reserves of support after 9/11. This climate of hostility affects us all, but most especially impacts those who reside overseas. Disappointment with current U.S. leadership is widespread, extending not just to the corridors of power and politics, but to the man and woman on the street as well. "'We believe John Kerry is the Democrat who can go toe-to-toe against the current Administration on national security and defense issues. We also remain convinced that John Kerry has the best chance of beating the incumbent in November, and putting America on a new course that will lead to a safer, more secure, and more stable world.'" -------------------------------------------------------------------------- [1] Tehran Times (Iran), February 8, 2004. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- "Jerry Steele" wrote in message om... will Al-Qaeda support? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Which candidate....
NOYB wrote:
I dunno about al-Qaeda...but Kerry is reaching out to the Iranians for their support. I guess he figures that if Iran sends enough insurgents into Iraq to bloody enough of our troops, then our country will elect him to deal with the problem. Please quote the part of Kerry's message that encourages "Iranian insurgents" to attack our troops. ... What a scumbag. I agree. You must be pretty hard up to believe any lie and repeat all slander from BushCo. Once the brain starts to atrophy, it's difficult to reverse... DSK |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Which candidate....
"DSK" wrote in message ... NOYB wrote: I dunno about al-Qaeda...but Kerry is reaching out to the Iranians for their support. I guess he figures that if Iran sends enough insurgents into Iraq to bloody enough of our troops, then our country will elect him to deal with the problem. Please quote the part of Kerry's message that encourages "Iranian insurgents" to attack our troops. Are you being intentionally obtuse? It's no secret that Bush has been putting the heat on Iran. We have 125,000 troops on their Western border...and air bases on their Eastern border. There's a distinct possibility that those troops will be used against Iran should Bush be reelected. The Iranians know that. Kerry's own email has stated his administration would "strive to overcome tensions with others". In other words, he'd go back to the way things were before...when Libya was developing WMD's, Saddam was developing missiles to strike Israel, and Iran was very actively pursuing a nuclear program. ... What a scumbag. I agree. You must be pretty hard up to believe any lie and repeat all slander from BushCo. Once the brain starts to atrophy, it's difficult to reverse... DSK |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Which candidate....
Please quote the part of Kerry's message that encourages "Iranian
insurgents" to attack our troops. NOYB wrote: Are you being intentionally obtuse? It's no secret that Bush has been putting the heat on Iran. I am not "obtuse" at all, however I do not see public disagreement with BushCo as "treason." Obviously, you do. I thought GW Bush was President, not Fuhrer. ... Kerry's own email has stated his administration would "strive to overcome tensions with others". In other words, he'd go back to the way things were before...when Libya was developing WMD's, Saddam was developing missiles to strike Israel, and Iran was very actively pursuing a nuclear program. Hardly. First of all, Saddam's "missiles to strike Israel" are every bit as much a fantasy as his WMD's. Secondly, Iran is *still* pursuing a nuclear weapons capability (or at least, as much of a one as they can afford)and the Bush team is doing little or nothing to stop them... kinda like North Korea... In other words, you are mindlessly spouting any and all BushCo propaganda, no matter how slanderous, stupid, and blatantly untrue. If the Bush worshippers keep hitting this "dissent equals treason" button hard enough, they'll be out on their ear come November. Americans don't like being pushed around. OTOH, maybe that's BushCo's plan... get installed by the Supreme Court for a 2nd term, no matter what the electorate decides, only maybe this time they will install him for life... and change his title... DSK |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Which candidate....
"DSK" wrote in message . .. Please quote the part of Kerry's message that encourages "Iranian insurgents" to attack our troops. NOYB wrote: Are you being intentionally obtuse? It's no secret that Bush has been putting the heat on Iran. I am not "obtuse" at all, however I do not see public disagreement with BushCo as "treason." Obviously, you do. I thought GW Bush was President, not Fuhrer. You can publically disagree with Bush all you want. However, when you're a US Senator, and you start sending emails to the intelligence communities of enemy nations...emails that have the intent of undermining the authority of the incumbent President...then you're a traitor. ... Kerry's own email has stated his administration would "strive to overcome tensions with others". In other words, he'd go back to the way things were before...when Libya was developing WMD's, Saddam was developing missiles to strike Israel, and Iran was very actively pursuing a nuclear program. Hardly. First of all, Saddam's "missiles to strike Israel" are every bit as much a fantasy as his WMD's. Kay's report said that they had several missiles and missile programs that were in violation of UN Res. 1441. In fact, Kay said they were much more advanced in that area than we once thought. Secondly, Iran is *still* pursuing a nuclear weapons capability (or at least, as much of a one as they can afford)and the Bush team is doing little or nothing to stop them... You just right along and keep believing that they're doing nothing... Iran is in our cross-hairs. Bet on it. We wouldn't have troops stationed on their Western and Eastern borders if Bush didn't mean business. kinda like North Korea... N. Korea was a situation where diplomacy (via China) has kept them at bay...for now. In other words, you are mindlessly spouting any and all BushCo propaganda, no matter how slanderous, stupid, and blatantly untrue. If the Bush worshippers keep hitting this "dissent equals treason" button hard enough, they'll be out on their ear come November. Americans don't like being pushed around. OTOH, maybe that's BushCo's plan... get installed by the Supreme Court for a 2nd term, no matter what the electorate decides, only maybe this time they will install him for life... and change his title... |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Which candidate....
"DSK" wrote in message
. .. I am not "obtuse" at all, however I do not see public disagreement with BushCo as "treason." Obviously, you do. I thought GW Bush was President, not Fuhrer. Not fuhrer, either. Try "deity". |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Which candidate....
From: DSK
First of all, Saddam's "missiles to strike Israel" are every bit as much a fantasy as his WMD's. I seem to remember some pretty realistic "fantasies" striking Israel during the 1st Gulf War. How about you? What's your recollection? 47 days to go.. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Which candidate....
"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net... The Iranians know that. Kerry's own email has stated his administration would "strive to overcome tensions with others". Very bad. We should always strive to INCREASE tensions with other countries using any means possible. It's the way to peace. If you're a moron. In other words, he'd go back to the way things were before...when Libya was developing WMD's, Saddam was developing missiles to strike Israel, and Iran was very actively pursuing a nuclear program. In other words? Actually, that's a conclusion only a moron could make. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
OT--Not again! More Chinese money buying our politicians. | General | |||
OT--Democrats just can't catch a break | General | |||
OT--What happens when Dean becomes the third party candidate? | General | |||
OT--new candidate | General |