Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"megabite" wrote
Preventive maintenence is always a smart strategy especially with watercraft. You're probably right that a prudent man would replace anything that's remotely questionable, but there's a point of diminishing returns to consider. Everything in my propulsion system is questionable to a certain degree, if you know what I mean. I don't want to bother with the expense and hassle of replacing a part that's likely to last as long as the rest of the unit. Taking the wife or loved ones out on it are ya? Yes, but on the river where I operate I can't get more than about 100 yards from shore and I seldom get more than a few miles from home. A mechanical breakdown for me would be a nuisance, but very unlikely to become life threatening. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
gimbal bearing or universal joint failure? | General | |||
Coast Guard Auxiliary and Homeland Security | General | |||
joint venture | General | |||
OT--new candidate | General |