|
Yamaha unions - basskisser, where are you?
|
Yamaha unions - basskisser, where are you?
|
Yamaha unions - basskisser, where are you?
B'asskisser wrote: Oh, horse****! You right bent, bush lovers post just as much off topic as ANYBODY on the left does. krause, an extremest lefty, has started more off-topic posts in the past two weeks, running a close second to jim dunce the pointy head. Things are getting paniky on the left it seems. That's a fact. Come'on, take the stupid helmet off b'asskisser and let some light shine in. -- Charlie ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
Yamaha unions - basskisser, where are you?
Charles wrote in message ...
B'asskisser wrote: Oh, horse****! You right bent, bush lovers post just as much off topic as ANYBODY on the left does. krause, an extremest lefty, has started more off-topic posts in the past two weeks, running a close second to jim dunce the pointy head. Things are getting paniky on the left it seems. That's a fact. Come'on, take the stupid helmet off b'asskisser and let some light shine in. Another off topic post by a righty. |
Yamaha unions - basskisser, where are you?
John H wrote in message . ..
On 9 Feb 2004 12:10:02 -0800, (basskisser) wrote: (Backyard Renegade) wrote in message So, we know Harry is a liar. No arguements there? Now the facts seem to be out on Basskisser, another one who will state anything during a debate, without reguard to truth. So now we are making progress. If we now dismiss both Harry and Bass, the whole damn group would soon be about boats again. Just don't address the lies, we all know they are lies. Put the Boats back into rec.boats... Oh, horse****! You right bent, bush lovers post just as much off topic as ANYBODY on the left does. I think, basskisser, the gist of the post had to do with truth (or lack thereof). John H Then you think wrong. |
Yamaha unions - basskisser, where are you?
John H wrote in message . ..
On 9 Feb 2004 12:05:53 -0800, (basskisser) wrote: "NOYB" wrote in message news:5nBUb.12504 Burned yet another bridge, eh, Johnny? Bridge? basskisser is a bridge to land of the idiots...and you're his toll collector. What an ignorant putz you are. You continue to amaze me with your stupidity. I mean, look at you, you have NOTHING of any substance to interject into the thread, yet continue to blather. Would you, basskisser, consider your post to be of *substance*? John H Simply replying to someone writing directly about ME, so yes. Also, I've interjected much into this thread. Now, let's get back to that fictitious person you talked to at Yamaha, U.S.A. that said there were no unions in Yamaha, U.S.A. owned support centers, distribution centers, etc. WHAT WAS HER NAME? |
Yamaha unions - basskisser, where are you?
basskisser wrote: Charles wrote in message ... B'asskisser wrote: Oh, horse****! You right bent, bush lovers post just as much off topic as ANYBODY on the left does. krause, an extremest lefty, has started more off-topic posts in the past two weeks, running a close second to jim dunce the pointy head. Things are getting paniky on the left it seems. That's a fact. Come'on, take the stupid helmet off b'asskisser and let some light shine in. Another off topic post by a righty. Another off topic post by a lefty. So there. na-na na-na-na. Keep it up and I'll start saying bad things about your mother. -- Charlie ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
Yamaha unions - basskisser, where are you?
John H wrote in message . ..
On 10 Feb 2004 03:21:26 -0800, (basskisser) wrote: John H wrote in message . .. On 9 Feb 2004 12:05:53 -0800, (basskisser) wrote: "NOYB" wrote in message news:5nBUb.12504 Burned yet another bridge, eh, Johnny? Bridge? basskisser is a bridge to land of the idiots...and you're his toll collector. What an ignorant putz you are. You continue to amaze me with your stupidity. I mean, look at you, you have NOTHING of any substance to interject into the thread, yet continue to blather. Would you, basskisser, consider your post to be of *substance*? John H Simply replying to someone writing directly about ME, so yes. Also, I've interjected much into this thread. Now, let's get back to that fictitious person you talked to at Yamaha, U.S.A. that said there were no unions in Yamaha, U.S.A. owned support centers, distribution centers, etc. WHAT WAS HER NAME? The fictitious person was the nice young lady who answers the phone at the headquarters number that I provided, in Cypress, CA. I don't need her name. If you need her name, call her. Basskisser, you tried to spread a little bull****, and it didn't't work. Now...cry yourself a river, get some wood, build a bridge, and get over it. John H John, you were caught dead in a lie, and you know it. Funny, when I called the headquarters, in Cypress, CA, NO ONE remembers that conversation. It's time to fess up, John. You know damned well you lied, because if you had went to all of that trouble to prove a point, and forgot to get a name, you'd be less intelligent than I thought. What good would that exercise be without any relevant information? |
Yamaha unions - basskisser, where are you?
On 11 Feb 2004 04:11:54 -0800, (basskisser) wrote:
John H wrote in message . .. On 10 Feb 2004 03:21:26 -0800, (basskisser) wrote: John H wrote in message . .. On 9 Feb 2004 12:05:53 -0800, (basskisser) wrote: "NOYB" wrote in message news:5nBUb.12504 Burned yet another bridge, eh, Johnny? Bridge? basskisser is a bridge to land of the idiots...and you're his toll collector. What an ignorant putz you are. You continue to amaze me with your stupidity. I mean, look at you, you have NOTHING of any substance to interject into the thread, yet continue to blather. Would you, basskisser, consider your post to be of *substance*? John H Simply replying to someone writing directly about ME, so yes. Also, I've interjected much into this thread. Now, let's get back to that fictitious person you talked to at Yamaha, U.S.A. that said there were no unions in Yamaha, U.S.A. owned support centers, distribution centers, etc. WHAT WAS HER NAME? The fictitious person was the nice young lady who answers the phone at the headquarters number that I provided, in Cypress, CA. I don't need her name. If you need her name, call her. Basskisser, you tried to spread a little bull****, and it didn't't work. Now...cry yourself a river, get some wood, build a bridge, and get over it. John H John, you were caught dead in a lie, and you know it. Funny, when I called the headquarters, in Cypress, CA, NO ONE remembers that conversation. It's time to fess up, John. You know damned well you lied, because if you had went to all of that trouble to prove a point, and forgot to get a name, you'd be less intelligent than I thought. What good would that exercise be without any relevant information? Right. You're starting to sound like a whining crybaby. If I were you I'd just drop it. John H On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! |
Yamaha unions - basskisser, where are you?
John H wrote in message . ..
On 11 Feb 2004 04:11:54 -0800, (basskisser) wrote: John H wrote in message . .. On 10 Feb 2004 03:21:26 -0800, (basskisser) wrote: John H wrote in message . .. On 9 Feb 2004 12:05:53 -0800, (basskisser) wrote: "NOYB" wrote in message news:5nBUb.12504 Burned yet another bridge, eh, Johnny? Bridge? basskisser is a bridge to land of the idiots...and you're his toll collector. What an ignorant putz you are. You continue to amaze me with your stupidity. I mean, look at you, you have NOTHING of any substance to interject into the thread, yet continue to blather. Would you, basskisser, consider your post to be of *substance*? John H Simply replying to someone writing directly about ME, so yes. Also, I've interjected much into this thread. Now, let's get back to that fictitious person you talked to at Yamaha, U.S.A. that said there were no unions in Yamaha, U.S.A. owned support centers, distribution centers, etc. WHAT WAS HER NAME? The fictitious person was the nice young lady who answers the phone at the headquarters number that I provided, in Cypress, CA. I don't need her name. If you need her name, call her. Basskisser, you tried to spread a little bull****, and it didn't't work. Now...cry yourself a river, get some wood, build a bridge, and get over it. John H John, you were caught dead in a lie, and you know it. Funny, when I called the headquarters, in Cypress, CA, NO ONE remembers that conversation. It's time to fess up, John. You know damned well you lied, because if you had went to all of that trouble to prove a point, and forgot to get a name, you'd be less intelligent than I thought. What good would that exercise be without any relevant information? Right. You're starting to sound like a whining crybaby. If I were you I'd just drop it. John H No, you mean that you WANT me to drop it, because I've made you out to be a liar. Why am I a crybaby, because I've either exposed your lie, or at the very least shown your shortcomings. Please address the above paragraph I've written. If you had went to all of that trouble, why didn't you provide the relevent information? |
Yamaha unions - basskisser, where are you?
thunder wrote in message ...
On Mon, 09 Feb 2004 10:39:48 -0500, Tuuk wrote: Here you go with your love for unions again basskisser, with all the damage unions have done to the west, one must wonder how you can still associate let alone defend unions. Give your head a shake. Yup, all sorts of damage, child labor laws, 40 hour work week, safe working conditions, living wage. You can argue they have outlived their usefulness, but on the whole, unions have done far more good than damage. Buy a Yamaha Outboard and send an American union job to Japan. |
Yamaha unions - basskisser, where are you?
Thunder
Give the head a shake there dummy, you have no clue of what your talking about. What your saying is that the unions are responsible for our 40 hour work week, child labor laws, safe working conditions, living wages,, come on there Thunder, I thought that our government and labor laws were responsible for those. Don't try to defend your unions, you cannot, they have done so much damage for us here in the west that it is irreversible. Thunder, if you and your buddy asskisser don't know what your talking about, then shut it. "thunder" wrote in message ... On Mon, 09 Feb 2004 10:39:48 -0500, Tuuk wrote: Here you go with your love for unions again basskisser, with all the damage unions have done to the west, one must wonder how you can still associate let alone defend unions. Give your head a shake. Yup, all sorts of damage, child labor laws, 40 hour work week, safe working conditions, living wage. You can argue they have outlived their usefulness, but on the whole, unions have done far more good than damage. |
Yamaha unions - basskisser, where are you?
Are you really as stupid as you sound?
The governments would have done little or nothing if not for lobbying by unions and socialist groups. I think you'd be wise to take your own advice. Tuuk wrote in message ... Thunder Give the head a shake there dummy, you have no clue of what your talking about. What your saying is that the unions are responsible for our 40 hour work week, child labor laws, safe working conditions, living wages,, come on there Thunder, I thought that our government and labor laws were responsible for those. Don't try to defend your unions, you cannot, they have done so much damage for us here in the west that it is irreversible. Thunder, if you and your buddy asskisser don't know what your talking about, then shut it. "thunder" wrote in message ... On Mon, 09 Feb 2004 10:39:48 -0500, Tuuk wrote: Here you go with your love for unions again basskisser, with all the damage unions have done to the west, one must wonder how you can still associate let alone defend unions. Give your head a shake. Yup, all sorts of damage, child labor laws, 40 hour work week, safe working conditions, living wage. You can argue they have outlived their usefulness, but on the whole, unions have done far more good than damage. |
Yamaha unions - basskisser, where are you?
Are you really as stupid as you sound?
"""""The governments would have done little or nothing if not for lobbying by unions and socialist groups. I think you'd be wise to take your own advice."""" Hey stupid,,, who said anything needed to be done? Come on , you need the government to tell you when to eat? when to ****? when to work? when to sleep? when to shower? when to shave? when to do this ? and when to do that? Come on simpleton, give your head a shake, your a big boy , you certainly could make some decisions on your own,,,, And because you couldn't ,, look what you dumb union members have done. YOu have caused all these job migrations. Then you ignorant labor try to bad mouth those in a more labor co-operative environment by saying things like "the children go to sweat shops with no shoes" wa, wa, wa, cry me another river, bring yourself some wood, build yourself a bridge and get over it. You dumb moron union greedy teamsters etc etc are what ruined the west and jobs, and you morons blame it on someone else,, So the government has done little or nothing you say,,, but you morons do not realize is that the market will decide globally. Tuuk wrote in message ... Thunder Give the head a shake there dummy, you have no clue of what your talking about. What your saying is that the unions are responsible for our 40 hour work week, child labor laws, safe working conditions, living wages,, come on there Thunder, I thought that our government and labor laws were responsible for those. Don't try to defend your unions, you cannot, they have done so much damage for us here in the west that it is irreversible. Thunder, if you and your buddy asskisser don't know what your talking about, then shut it. "thunder" wrote in message ... On Mon, 09 Feb 2004 10:39:48 -0500, Tuuk wrote: Here you go with your love for unions again basskisser, with all the damage unions have done to the west, one must wonder how you can still associate let alone defend unions. Give your head a shake. Yup, all sorts of damage, child labor laws, 40 hour work week, safe working conditions, living wage. You can argue they have outlived their usefulness, but on the whole, unions have done far more good than damage. |
Yamaha unions - basskisser, where are you?
Do you ever remove your head from your ass long enough to see daylight?
|
Yamaha unions - basskisser, where are you?
No time to stick my head up my ass, especially on company time. We leave
that for you union reps who need time to think. Too busy running a company with a few hundred other valuable employees. None of us feel the need to bite the owners hand, none of us feel the need to disrupt business operations with bull**** typical of union business. None of us feel the need to collectively unite to screw the owners, who have the most risk, who have the most invested, who are there twice as long as I, who deserve what little bit more is left over, if any. You union cry babies have reduced that little profit left over to near nothing, forcing businesses to more labor friendlier environment. Face it, you union morons did this because you haven't the knowledge, no education, you only advanced because of your own demanding, ridiculous and forced input to the operations of the firm. So what do you not understand there Harry and Don White ? Try answering that question without the insults only, I mean you can include your childish insulting, but try to answer the question. How do you think the unions are NOT responsible for this business migration? Don't give me your bull**** about labor laws, rights, abuse, people going to work without shoes on their feet, all the regular stupid union unknowledgeable and repeated over and over again because you cannot think for yourself bull,,, Why do you think the unions are not responsible? "Don White" wrote in message ... Do you ever remove your head from your ass long enough to see daylight? |
Yamaha unions - basskisser, where are you?
What company are you with. I'll send your queries along to the Quebec
Federation of Labour. They will be happy to 'educate you' on the particular circumstances in your area and type of business. .. |
Yamaha unions - basskisser, where are you?
On Tue, 17 Feb 2004 17:19:19 -0500, Gene Kearns
wrote: On Tue, 17 Feb 2004 08:51:57 -0500, " Tuuk" wrote: You union cry babies have reduced that little profit left over to near nothing, forcing businesses to more labor friendlier environment. Face it, you union morons did this because you haven't the knowledge, no education, you only advanced because of your own demanding, ridiculous and forced input to the operations of the firm. How do you think the unions are NOT responsible for this business migration? Don't give me your bull**** about labor laws, rights, abuse, people going to work without shoes on their feet, all the regular stupid union unknowledgeable and repeated over and over again because you cannot think for yourself bull,,, Why do you think the unions are not responsible? You seem to have a lot of answers. Perhaps you can explain this. North Carolina is a right-to-work state. That means there are *very* few union shops and that if the company you work for *has* a union, you can't be forced to become a member. Companies have moved out of North Carolina in droves, headed for countries in which the citizens can work for $.10 on the dollar compared to an American wage, and still eke out an existence. More often than not, these companies move to countries that have health care at least subsidized by the foreign government.... thus, they need not offer any health benefits. So, since, at least in North Carolina, unions are not to blame...... why is this happening? Because cheaper labor increases the profit margin. John H On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! |
Yamaha unions - basskisser, where are you?
At least John helped out this Tuuk character. Probably saved him a couple
nights anguish trying to answer the question. Gene Kearns wrote in message ... On Tue, 17 Feb 2004 17:39:19 -0500, John H wrote: Because cheaper labor increases the profit margin. Thanks, John, but I sorta considered it a rhetorical question.... -- Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Southport, NC. http://myworkshop.idleplay.net/cavern/ Homepage http://www.southharbourvillage.com/directions.asp Where Southport,NC is located. http://www.southharbourvillage.com/autoupdater.htm Real Time Pictures at My Marina http://www.thebayguide.com/rec.boats Rec.boats at Lee Yeaton's Bayguide |
Yamaha unions - basskisser, where are you?
On Tue, 17 Feb 2004 17:44:46 -0500, "Gene Kearns"
wrote: On Tue, 17 Feb 2004 17:39:19 -0500, John H wrote: Because cheaper labor increases the profit margin. Thanks, John, but I sorta considered it a rhetorical question.... Sorry, I guess I got you confused with basskisser. John H On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! |
Yamaha unions - basskisser, where are you?
"Gene Kearns" wrote in message ... On Tue, 17 Feb 2004 17:39:19 -0500, John H wrote: Because cheaper labor increases the profit margin. Thanks, John, but I sorta considered it a rhetorical question.... Well, here's a non-rhetorical question: How do you keep jobs from going overseas when the employee costs to the corporations are reduced by 90%? |
Yamaha unions - basskisser, where are you?
So you couldn't answer the question.
Don, Bass, come on, it is an easy question. How haven't the unions caused this massive migration? You seem to think that the unions are the best thing here in the west since whatever, but you dummies failed to see the damage that they have been bottling up, and finally this bottle released. You union dummies have screwed the west once and for all. Lets look at a say 10 year frame here, in 10 or even 20 years window. What do you think the unemployment rate will be? What do you think the debt will be? The states is near 7trillion, Canada near 600billion, See you union dummies tried to do some thinking, you forced yourselves to have say in the firm. You collectively made changes in the whole economic situation and you screwed up. Now the entire western economic structure will be disrupted because of your stupidity and greed. There, I answered the question for you morons. "NOYB" wrote in message nk.net... "Gene Kearns" wrote in message ... On Tue, 17 Feb 2004 17:39:19 -0500, John H wrote: Because cheaper labor increases the profit margin. Thanks, John, but I sorta considered it a rhetorical question.... Well, here's a non-rhetorical question: How do you keep jobs from going overseas when the employee costs to the corporations are reduced by 90%? |
Yamaha unions - basskisser, where are you?
"Gene Kearns" wrote in message ... On Wed, 18 Feb 2004 14:29:08 GMT, "NOYB" wrote: Well, here's a non-rhetorical question: How do you keep jobs from going overseas when the employee costs to the corporations are reduced by 90%? That isn't the right question, that is a defeatist's question. The proper question is, why have our elected officials stood there like goggle-eyed tourists and watched it happen? .... and continue to do so. For the same reason you avoided answering my question...there's no easy, short-term fix. If you conceive the world as one economy (which is really what this is all about), with the poorest 3 countries with a GDP of less than $560 and the richest three countries with a GDP of over $33,000... This is obviously not a level playing field and unless you'd like to assume a lifestyle much closer to the $560 than the $33,000, you'd better accept some form of "field leveling" technology, taxes, tariffs, whatever Let's look at your solutions: 1) "field leveling" technology-- how would that help? Then you'd have robots doing the labor instead of $2/day Chinamen 2) taxes-- on who? Corporations? Then they'd just cut even deeper into the employee costs 3) tariffs-- don't work. The Hawley-Smoot Tariff just managed to deepen and prolong the Great Depression. The recent steel tariff that Bush tried just ended up increasing costs to the manufacturers and end-users that depended upon it 4) whatever-- I like this solution. to bring the 59:1 discrepancy more in line with something workable. The best thing we can do is require that the governments who want to do business with us impose similar regulations (Fair Labor Standards, environmental controls, etc) on their manufacturing sector as we impose on ours. Anybody, no matter how incompetent, can run a business with these sorts of discrepancies.... and this is borne out in the all time high (Feb '04) trade deficit figures. With high tech jobs and industries, now headed overseas in droves... for the same reasons..... things aren't going to get any better just standing there watching it happen. Agreed. But you still haven't answered the question: What's *your* solution? |
Yamaha unions - basskisser, where are you?
John H wrote in message . ..
On Tue, 17 Feb 2004 17:44:46 -0500, "Gene Kearns" wrote: On Tue, 17 Feb 2004 17:39:19 -0500, John H wrote: Because cheaper labor increases the profit margin. Thanks, John, but I sorta considered it a rhetorical question.... Sorry, I guess I got you confused with basskisser. John H On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! You are easily confused. Just like when you thought that everyone would buy your lie about contacting Yamaha, U.S.A. Do you have the contact's name yet? If not, why not call *her* back, and GET her name. I really would love to talk to her. |
Yamaha unions - basskisser, where are you?
" Tuuk" wrote in message ...
Thunder Give the head a shake there dummy, you have no clue of what your talking about. What your saying is that the unions are responsible for our 40 hour work week, child labor laws, safe working conditions, living wages,, come on there Thunder, I thought that our government and labor laws were responsible for those. Don't try to defend your unions, you cannot, they have done so much damage for us here in the west that it is irreversible. Thunder, if you and your buddy asskisser don't know what your talking about, then shut it. Shut "it" for me, you idiot! I realize that you are dumber than a post, but here it is in a nutshell. Before organized labor in the United States, there was no incentive for a 40 hour work week, nor child labor laws. The UNIONS are the ones that got our government to realize these situations, and do something about them. The unions of today serve the same damn purpose, to lobby our government for new and better laws to protect us. You are a moron if you think that the government would have done anything otherwise. |
Yamaha unions - basskisser, where are you?
"NOYB" wrote in message news:UEKYb.9860
Well, here's a non-rhetorical question: How do you keep jobs from going overseas when the employee costs to the corporations are reduced by 90%? By making a comparable economy. Quite simple, actually. The cost of production is hugely influenced by lining the cofers of the corporations. Multi million dollar wages, etc. Inflation. If we reduce the cost of living, then we can reduce the cost of doing business in the U.S. as opposed to other countries. You do understand that, in some of those other countries, if a person were to make $10.00 per hour, they would be rich, don't you? So, it's a question of GLOBAL economy. |
Yamaha unions - basskisser, where are you?
Not too bright, are you?
Canada has been showing a surplus the last few years and using some (not much) to pay down the debt. Therefore, one has to assume the debt will actually shrink ...not grow. From your posts I get the impression you are some kind of low level supervisor in a small industry. Keep sucking up to the bosses and you might get to supervise a whole department of 'call centre' employees. Tuuk wrote in message ... So you couldn't answer the question. Don, Bass, come on, it is an easy question. How haven't the unions caused this massive migration? You seem to think that the unions are the best thing here in the west since whatever, but you dummies failed to see the damage that they have been bottling up, and finally this bottle released. You union dummies have screwed the west once and for all. Lets look at a say 10 year frame here, in 10 or even 20 years window. What do you think the unemployment rate will be? What do you think the debt will be? The states is near 7trillion, Canada near 600billion, See you union dummies tried to do some thinking, you forced yourselves to have say in the firm. You collectively made changes in the whole economic situation and you screwed up. Now the entire western economic structure will be disrupted because of your stupidity and greed. There, I answered the question for you morons. "NOYB" wrote in message nk.net... "Gene Kearns" wrote in message ... On Tue, 17 Feb 2004 17:39:19 -0500, John H wrote: Because cheaper labor increases the profit margin. Thanks, John, but I sorta considered it a rhetorical question.... Well, here's a non-rhetorical question: How do you keep jobs from going overseas when the employee costs to the corporations are reduced by 90%? |
Yamaha unions - basskisser, where are you?
Where did I say that I love unions? I simply stated that Yamaha U.S.A.'s operations centers, distribution centers, etc. use organized labor. You don't have a freakin' CLUE what the thread was about. Where did I "defend" unions? Why would someone like Dirtball Kraus claim he love Unions and would then purchase a Japanese outboard? |
Yamaha unions - basskisser, where are you?
"basskisser" wrote in message om... "NOYB" wrote in message news:UEKYb.9860 Well, here's a non-rhetorical question: How do you keep jobs from going overseas when the employee costs to the corporations are reduced by 90%? By making a comparable economy. Quite simple, actually. The cost of production is hugely influenced by lining the cofers of the corporations. Multi million dollar wages, etc. Inflation. If we reduce the cost of living, LOL. basskisser favors *DEFLATION* as a means to stop the efflux of jobs!?!? The cost of living has gotten that way because many overpaid union people are earning three times what the prevailing wage would be if free-market forces were allowed to take place. The COL has also risen because of the abundance of cheap money via financing. You can finance virtually anything nowadays. People from all levels of income believe they have a right to expensive electronics, nice cars, the latest appliances, etc. If we all lived within our means, there'd be less demand for the items, and they'd cost less. |
Yamaha unions - basskisser, where are you?
|
Yamaha unions - basskisser, where are you?
Bass, your economics is unusual, and you still didn't answer any questions
that were thrown to you. Ya, the unions had nothing to do with these job migrations over to a less expensive labor country. Nothing. bass, should be Carp. You keep sticking up for your union, only because you have to, do you have all your picket signs and skids in your garage all ready? Ya, maybe the unions leaders should run for elected office? CarpKisser, you really should give it up. And how is the government going to control what or how other countries run their countries? You trying to impose somemore import duties or tariffs to reduce market driven demands and supplies? Same as an automobile coming in from Japan, should cost about 5000 and because of import duties, to protect the unions, to protect the western labor, because they need extra help because on their own, they would starve, and now the Japan autos cost me, the end user 4 times what they should, because you union morons get paid four times what you should. There is your equalization factor. Come on there Carpkisser, give the head a shake. "basskisser" wrote in message om... " Tuuk" wrote in message ... Thunder Give the head a shake there dummy, you have no clue of what your talking about. What your saying is that the unions are responsible for our 40 hour work week, child labor laws, safe working conditions, living wages,, come on there Thunder, I thought that our government and labor laws were responsible for those. Don't try to defend your unions, you cannot, they have done so much damage for us here in the west that it is irreversible. Thunder, if you and your buddy asskisser don't know what your talking about, then shut it. Shut "it" for me, you idiot! I realize that you are dumber than a post, but here it is in a nutshell. Before organized labor in the United States, there was no incentive for a 40 hour work week, nor child labor laws. The UNIONS are the ones that got our government to realize these situations, and do something about them. The unions of today serve the same damn purpose, to lobby our government for new and better laws to protect us. You are a moron if you think that the government would have done anything otherwise. |
Yamaha unions - basskisser, where are you?
I haven't decided if you really are as dumb as advertised or just another
poor excuse for a troll. If I remember correctly, the labour component in a vehicle price was about $1500.00 If that is so and the unions offered to work for $ 5.00 per hour...the vehicle would only be about $ 1200.00 cheaper. So which is it....?? are you really dumb or just pretending... so you can agitate decent hardworking union folk .Tuurky boy? Tuuk wrote in message ... snip And how is the government going to control what or how other countries run their countries? You trying to impose somemore import duties or tariffs to reduce market driven demands and supplies? Same as an automobile coming in from Japan, should cost about 5000 and because of import duties, to protect the unions, to protect the western labor, because they need extra help because on their own, they would starve, and now the Japan autos cost me, the end user 4 times what they should, because you union morons get paid four times what you should. There is your equalization factor. Come on there Carpkisser, give the head a shake. |
Yamaha unions - basskisser, where are you?
Shut "it" for me, you idiot! I realize that you are dumber than a post, but here it is in a nutshell. Before organized labor in the United States, there was no incentive for a 40 hour work week, nor child labor laws. The UNIONS are the ones that got our government to realize these situations, and do something about them. The unions of today serve the same damn purpose, to lobby our government for new and better laws to protect us. You are a moron if you think that the government would have done anything otherwise. If that is so then why does Hairball Hairy Kraus buy a Japanese outboard? Because he wants to bust American unions!! |
Yamaha unions - basskisser, where are you?
"Don White" wrote in message ...
I haven't decided if you really are as dumb as advertised or just another poor excuse for a troll. If I remember correctly, the labour component in a vehicle price was about $1500.00 If that is so and the unions offered to work for $ 5.00 per hour...the vehicle would only be about $ 1200.00 cheaper. So which is it....?? are you really dumb or just pretending... so you can agitate decent hardworking union folk .Tuurky boy? I know the answer to your first sentence, Don, and I think YOU do, too!!!!!! |
Yamaha unions - basskisser, where are you?
" Tuuk" wrote in message ...
Bass, your economics is unusual, and you still didn't answer any questions that were thrown to you. Of course I answered it, you are just too dumb to comprehend it. |
Yamaha unions - basskisser, where are you?
John H wrote in message
Sorry, I guess I got you confused with basskisser. John H On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! You are easily confused. Just like when you thought that everyone would buy your lie about contacting Yamaha, U.S.A. Do you have the contact's name yet? If not, why not call *her* back, and GET her name. I really would love to talk to her. basskisser, you lost that round so long ago............. John H On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! Uh, how so, John? What evidence do you have that Yamaha, U.S.A., and it's wholly owned subsidiaries are not using organized labor. If you will call that nice lady back, that you claim to have had a conversation with, get her name, and I'll talk to her. Then we can settle this. Agree? |
Yamaha unions - basskisser, where are you?
On Wed, 18 Feb 2004 20:06:14 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote: John H wrote: On 18 Feb 2004 11:09:34 -0800, (basskisser) wrote: John H wrote in message . .. On Tue, 17 Feb 2004 17:44:46 -0500, "Gene Kearns" wrote: On Tue, 17 Feb 2004 17:39:19 -0500, John H wrote: Because cheaper labor increases the profit margin. Thanks, John, but I sorta considered it a rhetorical question.... Sorry, I guess I got you confused with basskisser. John H On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! You are easily confused. Just like when you thought that everyone would buy your lie about contacting Yamaha, U.S.A. Do you have the contact's name yet? If not, why not call *her* back, and GET her name. I really would love to talk to her. basskisser, you lost that round so long ago............. John H He did? On the basis of what? Your statements? You righties...always wrong. Harry, do you really believe your credibility adds to basskisser's? John H On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! |
Yamaha unions - basskisser, where are you?
|
Yamaha unions - basskisser, where are you?
Don White
LOL,,, you figure that the labor component of an automobile here in the west is 1500 dollars? Are you out of your mind? My father just bought a big suv, I think it was near 65,000. and you are telling me that only 1500. is labor, Don, you sure have lost it. And in the same sentence you made the statement that you are undecided if I am dumb or a troll,,, then you say something like that....LOL,,,, now who is the idiot? If the costs of an western auto associates 2% of its total costs to labor, what would you associate the balance or remaining 98% of the costs? Material? No,, dont tell me,, management? Taxes? Resources? Fees? LOL,,,,Donny, you have really embarrassed yourself with this one. Give the head a shake. "Don White" wrote in message ... I haven't decided if you really are as dumb as advertised or just another poor excuse for a troll. If I remember correctly, the labour component in a vehicle price was about $1500.00 If that is so and the unions offered to work for $ 5.00 per hour...the vehicle would only be about $ 1200.00 cheaper. So which is it....?? are you really dumb or just pretending... so you can agitate decent hardworking union folk .Tuurky boy? Tuuk wrote in message ... snip And how is the government going to control what or how other countries run their countries? You trying to impose somemore import duties or tariffs to reduce market driven demands and supplies? Same as an automobile coming in from Japan, should cost about 5000 and because of import duties, to protect the unions, to protect the western labor, because they need extra help because on their own, they would starve, and now the Japan autos cost me, the end user 4 times what they should, because you union morons get paid four times what you should. There is your equalization factor. Come on there Carpkisser, give the head a shake. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:43 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com