It's just those damn conservatives and the one's who are sick of
Harry's ****.
It's certainly none of the libs or Harry himself, right Chuck.

Sounds like sanctimonious, hypocritical crap to me.
--
John H


*************

Experiment with reading for content, John.

"Exchanges between Harry and his obsessed nemesi", for example.
Specifically includes Harry, wouldn't you agree?

Are "the libs" harrassing one particular individual? Are "the libs"
posing as one of the conservative posters to make phony statements? Are
"the libs" the group that specializes in multi-paragraph attack posts
denigrating people's ethnic heritage, marital status, etc, etc, etc,
etc? Well, if they are then they are certainly included in my criticism
of that behavior.

Funny thing, John. I never identified anybody as liberal, conservative,
or otherwise.
*You* self-identified the conservative nature of some of the folks
f**king up every on-topic thread with non-stop attack posts, not I.

In fact, I covered the entire spectrum with this comment:

If a person cuts and pastes an anti-war, anti-Bush, or pro-war,
pro-Bush whatever item into the NG, he or she deserves whatever crap
results in the thread.


But you apparently chose to read only about half that statement so you
could interpret it as an "attack" on conservatives.

Why was that, John? Any specific reason? Again, may I suggest you read
for content and react to what is actually written rather than to
something you assume or presume
a poster might secretly feel? I take responsiblity for what I write,
not for your wild guess about what I might have meant.