Chuck,

Karen has done a good job of getting under your skin, and you have been just
as good at attacking her and trying to get under her skin. Your "shred of
civility" in your discussions with Karen might show a touch more tact than
Karen, but not much.

I have found that anyone who posts controversial OT threads just so they can
use these "cut and paste" articles as a vehicle to make personal attacks
suffer from some serious issues. Do you disagree?




wrote in message
ups.com...
Chuck,
You seem to spend a lot of time telling everyone how sick and mentally
ill
Karen is.


*********

Her line count is about 10 times mine. I don't spend enough.

I suggested that she ask a health professional if her obsession with HK
is healthy.
I'm not qualified to pronounce her sick or mentally ill from a clinical
perspective- but she's the one who says it's right to "call 'em as you
see 'em". Unfortunately, some of us are constrained by a need to
adhere to some shred of civility so calling 'em as they really appear
would be embarrassing all the way around.

I maintain my opinion that people who follow others through a newsgroup
looking for any and all openings to make personal attacks suffer from
some serious issues. Do you disagree?