Of course, if I were smart enough to truly understand these things, I
couldn't help but be a democrat!

John Gaquin wrote:

OK, I think I've got it now. Let me see -- you take the Exit Polls, read
the data, think about the data, arrange the data in neat rows and columns,
and when your done, you have -- Exit Polls!

OK!!!! Thanks, Harry!


John, you forgot the spin part. When krause says, "The data has to be
analyzed and put into meaningful form", that's krause spinning it.

-- Charlie


----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 22:59:49 GMT, "NOYB" wrote:


"John Gaquin" wrote in message
...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message

Are you fellas really as stupid as you present? Exit polls are nothing
more than raw data. The data has to be analyzed and put into meaningful
form. Exit poll results are based upon more than just interviews with
voters as they leave the polls. In other words, exit poll results are
based *largely* but not entirely on these interviews.


OK, I think I've got it now. Let me see -- you take the Exit Polls, read
the data, think about the data, arrange the data in neat rows and columns,
and when your done, you have -- Exit Polls!

OK!!!! Thanks, Harry!


John you ****in' simpleton. You're just so stupid it's not even worth
debating any further. If you weren't so dumb, Harry could explain it to
you. Of course, your binary thinking would make you conclude that "exit
polls" and "exit polls" are the same thing. Bush is dumb. You're dumber.
Geez. Don't you get it!?

turn off sarcasm mode

I sure hope you're talking to that other John and not this one. Hell,
I only thought that exit polls were taken as they *entered*. I'm not
near as badly off as the other guy. Thank God for the Harry's of this
world to keep us straight.

John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"John Gaquin" wrote in message
...


Of course, if I were smart enough to truly understand these things, I
couldn't help but be a democrat!



Its not the exit poll that is important it it the person that analyizes the
exit pool, just like it's not the vote that is important it is the vote
coutner that is important.

Bert

"Gene Kearns" wrote in message
...

Stupid is as stupid does.


That's one of the stupidest things I've ever heard.

DSK wrote in message . ..
"Gene Kearns" wrote:
I'll keep an open mind..... but as long as the Democrats run idiots
like Johnson, Carter, and Clinton..... I just can't do it.




Gary Warner wrote:
You may not like Carter or Clinton. You may think one was weak or the
other was morally bankrupt. I can understand how you might disagree
with their policies. But how in the world can you honestly peg either
of those men as an idiot?? These are two VERY bright men.

Really, I'm curious.

Pure bigotry, what else?

The hatred of the Religious Right for President Jimmy Carter shows that
they are neither religious nor right. Jimmy Carter is an outstanding
example of Christian ethics and principles in action. There is nobody on
the "religious" right who walks the walk like Carter does... and has,
all his life.

He may not have been a great President... IMHO the fiasco at Desert One
has overshadowed a lot of his positive accomplishments... but he is a
great man... and that _bothers_ them.

Regards
Doug King

You are absolutely correct!

only cowards hide behind fake email names!