But, I thought that you had to get an interest only loan?????

wrote in message
oups.com...
But, I thought that you had to get an interest only loan?????


The bank was offering me either loan...conventional, or interest-only.

I chose the interest only loan over the conventional 30-year fixed, because
it gives me the option to pay principal on the loan (but only if *I *decide
to do so). Right now, it makes more sense for me to put $25-30k per year
away in a qualified pension plan than to pay principal on a home mortgage.
In 4 1/2 years, I'll only be 38...and I'll have an extra $6000/mo (before
taxes) to put towards principal and/or retirement savings. At that time, I
can get a 20 year conventional fixed mortgage, and pay the home off before
I'm 60.

NOYB wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...
But, I thought that you had to get an interest only loan?????


The bank was offering me either loan...conventional, or
interest-only.

I chose the interest only loan over the conventional 30-year fixed,
because
it gives me the option to pay principal on the loan (but only if *I
*decide
to do so). Right now, it makes more sense for me to put $25-30k per
year
away in a qualified pension plan than to pay principal on a home
mortgage.
In 4 1/2 years, I'll only be 38...and I'll have an extra $6000/mo
(before
taxes) to put towards principal and/or retirement savings. At that
time, I
can get a 20 year conventional fixed mortgage, and pay the home off
before
I'm 60.


Yeah, sure, whatever.......

On 23 Mar 2005 05:01:54 -0800, "basskisser" wrote:


NOYB wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...
But, I thought that you had to get an interest only loan?????


The bank was offering me either loan...conventional, or
interest-only.

I chose the interest only loan over the conventional 30-year fixed,
because
it gives me the option to pay principal on the loan (but only if *I
*decide
to do so). Right now, it makes more sense for me to put $25-30k per
year
away in a qualified pension plan than to pay principal on a home
mortgage.
In 4 1/2 years, I'll only be 38...and I'll have an extra $6000/mo
(before
taxes) to put towards principal and/or retirement savings. At that
time, I
can get a 20 year conventional fixed mortgage, and pay the home off
before
I'm 60.


Yeah, sure, whatever.......

basskisser, is that the best you can do when you see a good idea put in place?
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

"John H" wrote in message
...
On 23 Mar 2005 05:01:54 -0800, "basskisser" wrote:


NOYB wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...
But, I thought that you had to get an interest only loan?????


The bank was offering me either loan...conventional, or
interest-only.

I chose the interest only loan over the conventional 30-year fixed,
because
it gives me the option to pay principal on the loan (but only if *I
*decide
to do so). Right now, it makes more sense for me to put $25-30k per
year
away in a qualified pension plan than to pay principal on a home
mortgage.
In 4 1/2 years, I'll only be 38...and I'll have an extra $6000/mo
(before
taxes) to put towards principal and/or retirement savings. At that
time, I
can get a 20 year conventional fixed mortgage, and pay the home off
before
I'm 60.


Yeah, sure, whatever.......

basskisser, is that the best you can do when you see a good idea put in
place?
--

What do you expect from the "King"


John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

John H wrote:
On 23 Mar 2005 05:01:54 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


NOYB wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...
But, I thought that you had to get an interest only loan?????


The bank was offering me either loan...conventional, or
interest-only.

I chose the interest only loan over the conventional 30-year
fixed,
because
it gives me the option to pay principal on the loan (but only if
*I
*decide
to do so). Right now, it makes more sense for me to put $25-30k
per
year
away in a qualified pension plan than to pay principal on a home
mortgage.
In 4 1/2 years, I'll only be 38...and I'll have an extra $6000/mo
(before
taxes) to put towards principal and/or retirement savings. At
that
time, I
can get a 20 year conventional fixed mortgage, and pay the home
off
before
I'm 60.


Yeah, sure, whatever.......

basskisser, is that the best you can do when you see a good idea put
in place?
--
John H

No, but you know how NOYB is, no sense in trying to make him think
anything other than what he does, says, where he lives, his occupation,
his thoughts, and on and on, are anything less than superior to anyone
else in the universe. Just ask him! Now, as far as a "good idea", he's
admitted himself that he is financially stretched tight.

On 23 Mar 2005 09:44:18 -0800, "basskisser" wrote:


John H wrote:
On 23 Mar 2005 05:01:54 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


NOYB wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...
But, I thought that you had to get an interest only loan?????


The bank was offering me either loan...conventional, or
interest-only.

I chose the interest only loan over the conventional 30-year
fixed,
because
it gives me the option to pay principal on the loan (but only if
*I
*decide
to do so). Right now, it makes more sense for me to put $25-30k
per
year
away in a qualified pension plan than to pay principal on a home
mortgage.
In 4 1/2 years, I'll only be 38...and I'll have an extra $6000/mo
(before
taxes) to put towards principal and/or retirement savings. At
that
time, I
can get a 20 year conventional fixed mortgage, and pay the home
off
before
I'm 60.


Yeah, sure, whatever.......

basskisser, is that the best you can do when you see a good idea put
in place?
--
John H

No, but you know how NOYB is, no sense in trying to make him think
anything other than what he does, says, where he lives, his occupation,
his thoughts, and on and on, are anything less than superior to anyone
else in the universe. Just ask him! Now, as far as a "good idea", he's
admitted himself that he is financially stretched tight.

My daughter has commented to me about having a negative balance, on occasion, in
my checkbook. To her, who has bounced a check to me, this was really something
to 'catch her dad' with.

There are times when it is beneficial to one's longer term interests to be
somewhat 'stretched tight'. That is not, necessarily, a sign of bad financial
management. I financed my house for 15 years instead of 30. The additional
payment amount stretched me a little more than I had been, but I think that the
long term benefits will be worth the stretch.

I don't know NYOB's situation, other than what I've read. I *do* know that he
has given thought to his situation. That, in itself, is more than a lot of folks
do.

His plan makes sense.

There may be those in the universe who have a better occupation, better place to
live, and are better able to express their point of view. From my perspective,
you haven't shown that you are one of them. Of course, that's just my opinion.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

John H wrote:
On 23 Mar 2005 09:44:18 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


John H wrote:
On 23 Mar 2005 05:01:54 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


NOYB wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...
But, I thought that you had to get an interest only loan?????


The bank was offering me either loan...conventional, or
interest-only.

I chose the interest only loan over the conventional 30-year
fixed,
because
it gives me the option to pay principal on the loan (but only
if
*I
*decide
to do so). Right now, it makes more sense for me to put
$25-30k
per
year
away in a qualified pension plan than to pay principal on a
home
mortgage.
In 4 1/2 years, I'll only be 38...and I'll have an extra
$6000/mo
(before
taxes) to put towards principal and/or retirement savings. At
that
time, I
can get a 20 year conventional fixed mortgage, and pay the home
off
before
I'm 60.


Yeah, sure, whatever.......

basskisser, is that the best you can do when you see a good idea
put
in place?
--
John H

No, but you know how NOYB is, no sense in trying to make him think
anything other than what he does, says, where he lives, his
occupation,
his thoughts, and on and on, are anything less than superior to
anyone
else in the universe. Just ask him! Now, as far as a "good idea",
he's
admitted himself that he is financially stretched tight.

My daughter has commented to me about having a negative balance, on
occasion, in
my checkbook. To her, who has bounced a check to me, this was really
something
to 'catch her dad' with.

There are times when it is beneficial to one's longer term interests
to be
somewhat 'stretched tight'. That is not, necessarily, a sign of bad
financial
management. I financed my house for 15 years instead of 30. The
additional
payment amount stretched me a little more than I had been, but I
think that the
long term benefits will be worth the stretch.

I don't know NYOB's situation, other than what I've read. I *do* know
that he
has given thought to his situation. That, in itself, is more than a
lot of folks
do.

His plan makes sense.

There may be those in the universe who have a better occupation,
better place to
live, and are better able to express their point of view. From my
perspective,
you haven't shown that you are one of them. Of course, that's just my
opinion.
--
John H


So, if you pay someone to use their money, ie, a loan, it's superior to
using your OWN money, and not having to pay interest rates? The bottom
line is, if someone is taking money from you month after month, you are
losing money.

John H wrote:
On 23 Mar 2005 09:44:18 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


John H wrote:
On 23 Mar 2005 05:01:54 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


NOYB wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...
But, I thought that you had to get an interest only loan?????


The bank was offering me either loan...conventional, or
interest-only.

I chose the interest only loan over the conventional 30-year
fixed,
because
it gives me the option to pay principal on the loan (but only
if
*I
*decide
to do so). Right now, it makes more sense for me to put
$25-30k
per
year
away in a qualified pension plan than to pay principal on a
home
mortgage.
In 4 1/2 years, I'll only be 38...and I'll have an extra
$6000/mo
(before
taxes) to put towards principal and/or retirement savings. At
that
time, I
can get a 20 year conventional fixed mortgage, and pay the home
off
before
I'm 60.


Yeah, sure, whatever.......

basskisser, is that the best you can do when you see a good idea
put
in place?
--
John H

No, but you know how NOYB is, no sense in trying to make him think
anything other than what he does, says, where he lives, his
occupation,
his thoughts, and on and on, are anything less than superior to
anyone
else in the universe. Just ask him! Now, as far as a "good idea",
he's
admitted himself that he is financially stretched tight.

My daughter has commented to me about having a negative balance, on
occasion, in
my checkbook. To her, who has bounced a check to me, this was really
something
to 'catch her dad' with.

There are times when it is beneficial to one's longer term interests
to be
somewhat 'stretched tight'. That is not, necessarily, a sign of bad
financial
management. I financed my house for 15 years instead of 30. The
additional
payment amount stretched me a little more than I had been, but I
think that the
long term benefits will be worth the stretch.

Ah, now, paying off a loan quickly is right the opposite of an interest
only loan! You are purposefully paying off the principal quicker, while
he isn't paying ANY of it off. I've got a 30 year fixed, and it will be
paid off in 17 years because of extra payments applied directly to the
principal. I don't care what anybody says, I don't like being in debt.
I don't take out car loans, I save until I have cash to buy a car,
therefore I don't pay anybody to use their money. Same principal.

"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

NOYB wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...
But, I thought that you had to get an interest only loan?????


The bank was offering me either loan...conventional, or
interest-only.

I chose the interest only loan over the conventional 30-year fixed,
because
it gives me the option to pay principal on the loan (but only if *I
*decide
to do so). Right now, it makes more sense for me to put $25-30k per
year
away in a qualified pension plan than to pay principal on a home
mortgage.
In 4 1/2 years, I'll only be 38...and I'll have an extra $6000/mo
(before
taxes) to put towards principal and/or retirement savings. At that
time, I
can get a 20 year conventional fixed mortgage, and pay the home off
before
I'm 60.


Yeah, sure, whatever.......


Boy, you sure put a lot of thought into that reply. Sorry I taxed your
brain so much.