|
John H wrote: On 17 Mar 2005 10:32:47 -0800, wrote: John H wrote: On 17 Mar 2005 09:32:06 -0800, wrote: John H wrote: On 17 Mar 2005 08:35:46 -0800, wrote: People who are always automatically so anti-tax ... Gee, who would these be Chuck? Surely you're not referring to one political group are you? The only group would be, "People who are always automatically so anti-tax" If the shoe fits...... An even more interesting question might be, "How does a properly fitted and fastened life vest go floating away?" How do you know it was "properly fitted and fastened", John? That *is* the question, isn't it??? [Thanks!] No, John, please learn to comprehend what you, yourself has asked. You asked HOW DOES a properly fitted and fastened...... You didn't ask IF is was properly fitted and fastened, etc. By the way, sliding down jagged rip-rap rocks could certainly rip a properly fitted and fastened life vest from a person, allowing it to "go floating away". 'Rip rap rocks?' From whence came that? Have you been there and seen the canal? -- John H Perhaps from the news story, also? "But detectives say Lone's partner couldn't see him when Lone apparently slipped on the rocks" |
Are you calling Gould a right winger?
I know you aren't talking to me because I didn't call Gould anything, I was asking him why HE thought he was a Ridiculous Asshole. In case you didn't read the message above mine, Gould called JimH (and anyone who responds to him) "a ridiculous asshole". Now that I think about it, Gould called you a ridiculous asshole. The only point of my post was I thought Gould was being a little hard on himself. Do you disagree with me? wrote in message oups.com... Dr. Dr. John Smith wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Don White wrote: JimH 1919-2005 Tragically flushed down the toilet. Dissolve In Peace ***************** That's probably the right solution. Ignoring him means that only one person is acting like a ridiculous asshole, but responding runs the risk of stooping to his level and suddenly creating a second. Another dry drunk, (reformed flamer), falls off the wagon and back into the dungheap. No surpise. Ridiculous asshole ..... aren't you being a little hard on yourself? I knew the right wingers here couldn't stop name calling. It's all they have. How low can you go? |
wrote in message oups.com... That's probably the right solution. Ignoring him means that only one person is acting like a ridiculous asshole, but responding runs the risk of stooping to his level and suddenly creating a second. Another dry drunk, (reformed flamer), falls off the wagon and back into the dungheap. No surpise. Sometimes you just have to do what's necessary. When you have a little yappy dog nipping at your heels, your first inclination to kick it away. Poor Jimh doesn't have the sense to slink away after repeated bootings. What do you do?? |
JimH wrote:
You just can't stand being challenged on your views or your subsequent spins, now can you. Killfile me for all I care. It will show I was correct in my assumption. *********** Can't stand being challenged on my views? I'll discuss *issues* with anybody capable of understanging abstract thought and who can carry on a debate without immediately resorting to personal remark.....(even *opening* with one, as happened in this thread). The kindest compliment I get in a day is to learn that people with perspectives, philosophies, (and lives organized as yours seems to be), disagree with my opinions and despise me as an individual. Your assumption, like others, makes an ASS of U and ME. The last time you were correct was when you apologized to the NG for expressing the exact same behavior you have now resumed. |
"Dr. Dr. John Smith" wrote in message ... For someone who "killfiled" JimH, you sure seem obsessed by him. You respond to everyone one of his posts with an insult. And I don't even have a son named Jeff. LOL! Krause is indeed infatuated with me. He has stalked me and my wife, posted our address here in this NG and made personal threats to us. He is a sick man. Gould is starting to act the same. He has to insult me every time he responds to one of my posts. I thought he was above that but I guess not. |
Dr. Dr. John Smith wrote: Are you calling Gould a right winger? The old gray matter isn't working well for you today, is it? |
I know you aren't talking to me because I didn't call Gould anything, I was
asking him why HE thought he was a Ridiculous Asshole. In case you didn't read the message above mine, Gould called JimH (and anyone who responds to him) "a ridiculous asshole". Now that I think about it, Gould called you a ridiculous asshole. wrote in message oups.com... Dr. Dr. John Smith wrote: Are you calling Gould a right winger? The old gray matter isn't working well for you today, is it? |
Dr. Dr. John Smith wrote: I know you aren't talking to me because I didn't call Gould anything, I was asking him why HE thought he was a Ridiculous Asshole. In case you didn't read the message above mine, Gould called JimH (and anyone who responds to him) "a ridiculous asshole". Now that I think about it, Gould called you a ridiculous asshole. Like I said, I don't think your gray matter is up to snuff today. We'll try one more time, just for you..... perhaps you need to go back a little farther in time than the post you are blabbing about above........easy now, don't want you to implode thinking too hard. |
"Dr. Dr. John Smith" wrote in message news:... wrote in message oups.com... Don White wrote: JimH 1919-2005 Tragically flushed down the toilet. Dissolve In Peace ***************** That's probably the right solution. Ignoring him means that only one person is acting like a ridiculous asshole, but responding runs the risk of stooping to his level and suddenly creating a second. Another dry drunk, (reformed flamer), falls off the wagon and back into the dungheap. No surpise. Ridiculous asshole ..... aren't you being a little hard on yourself? |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:22 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com