Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Tinkerntom wrote: KMAN wrote: in article , Tinkerntom at wrote on 3/20/05 2:03 AM: KMAN wrote: in article , Tinkerntom at wrote on 3/19/05 3:17 AM: KMAN wrote: in article , Tinkerntom at wrote on 3/19/05 2:14 AM: KMAN wrote: in article , Tinkerntom at wrote on 3/19/05 1:44 AM: KMAN wrote: "Melissa" wrote in message ... -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 Hi BCITORGB, On 18 Mar 2005 09:05:14 -0800, you wrote: Let me translate, into 'murcan: F*CK OFF! Depending on context, the exact meaning of "sod off" can be as offensive as you describe, or as mild as a somewhat annoyed "go away". Since I'm not prone to say things such as the former, even when I'm *really* annoyed, my use of the phrase here was definitely of the latter sort. Perhaps a bit "over the top" for effect, I admit, and I suppose it could have been easily misunderstood, so I do apologize if I've offended anyone *way too much*. Besides, I only mentioned the phrase in terms of trying to think up a "tactful" way to say it! ;-) - -- Melissa You could try "get bent" but then in Tinkerntom's case, he's already "around the bend"... OF course KMAN would know, he got there before I did! TnT I had to get a good seat to watch you go over the edge. I guess I always figured you for the couch potatoe type! Tnt We need William Figueroa here to explain to Tinkerntom why he is starting to look as hebetudinous as he is crazy ;-) Well, life is like a box of chocolates, you learn to make do with what you got, or not! Not all of us are smart as you to use such big words, must be from setting around reading the dictionary. TnT Forget the big words, did you at least get the Figueroa reference...and why I made it? The name Dan Quail rings a bell! I'm glad you are around two make sure we don't all goe offf halfed cocked and spill a worrd witd lesss than camplete accurracy now and then. Humour, Tinkerntom. Humour. I thought I was being humorous also, thanks for the compliment! I am surre yu woold knot be able to figur oot what else important is going on or been saide if thar wert a sppeellen errorr. Some politicians carreers have fallen because of a simple misspelled word. Now for those who set around and read a dictionary all day for inspirational reading, cause they can't figure anything really significant to do than to be picky about other folks spelling errors If I had just jumped into RPB and made a joke about your spelling abilities, I'd have to agree with you. However, in light of the vast amounts of your verbiage that I have waded through on numerous occasions, you might be getting a tad carried away with this angle. Hey, you have asked questions that sometimes required an indepth discussion. If you want to keep it simple, ask simple questions! and can't make a positive constructive contribution to an ongoing discussion, then it should not surprise you when they would delight to bring down a decent and honorable man Humble too! I agree, he could have acted more humble, but then politicians running for high office aren't known for being humble, and the news media loves to find a weak point, and never let it go. I am sure that if you ask Dan, how to spell patato now, he would be able to tell you. So should we ask him to be president now, that he knows how to spell patato! because of a spelling error, in order to promote their own philanderer, and then think that the philanderer is a asset to the country and the world. Uh. I'm promoting a philanderer by having fun with your spelling of potato? No, but the media at the time sure had fun at Dan's expense, and used it to promote BillyBob, without really checking out some of the serious allegations about the latter. And then they act surprised about Monica. But such is how some enlightened elitist think and act. And so it would not surprise me that the same enlightened elitist attitude would be substituted for a meaningjul contribution on something as lame as the RBP. TnT Man, you jesus freaks sure ain't fun. Oh, we can be fun, but I prefer when discussing substantive issues with you, instead of my spelling, or for that matter yours, not becoming the subject. Sp flames are not particularly interesting. If it is critical for the content of the discussion, then clarify for clarity sake, otherwise figure it out. I have seen so many threads just break down into nit-picking ****ing contest. I know that you are able to discuss issues in a mature and thoughtful manner. I have gotten to know enough about you to know that you have alot to contribute to a discussion, and that you have a perspective that is valuable for me to hear. It is distressing and annoying when you get picky and penny ante, and I am inclined to just ignore you as I do a few others. There are times when we snipe at each other, and it can be fun, from the stand point that as we have gotten to know one another, we know each others hot buttons. Hopefully we do not do so to destroy the other person. I am sure that from your perspective of me going over the edge, while you are setting on your couch reading the dictionary, must look very humorous to a Martian checking out the local electronic binary data fields surrounding the Earth. Some of the quips are cute, clever, and funny, and then some are mean, nasty, and hurt. I would assume from what you have indicated about your respect for mankind, that you would not intentionally hurt another human being. Why would you do it mentally, and then claim it was fun. See I've gotten to know you to well, and I actually don't think you are such a bad guy! Respectfully TnT Here is something funny, I was checking out my post, and I still can't spell "potato!" I wanted to warn you so that you don't choke on patato, laughing! TnT |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
in article , Tinkerntom
at wrote on 3/20/05 4:38 AM: Tinkerntom wrote: KMAN wrote: in article , Tinkerntom at wrote on 3/20/05 2:03 AM: KMAN wrote: in article , Tinkerntom at wrote on 3/19/05 3:17 AM: KMAN wrote: in article , Tinkerntom at wrote on 3/19/05 2:14 AM: KMAN wrote: in article , Tinkerntom at wrote on 3/19/05 1:44 AM: KMAN wrote: "Melissa" wrote in message ... -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 Hi BCITORGB, On 18 Mar 2005 09:05:14 -0800, you wrote: Let me translate, into 'murcan: F*CK OFF! Depending on context, the exact meaning of "sod off" can be as offensive as you describe, or as mild as a somewhat annoyed "go away". Since I'm not prone to say things such as the former, even when I'm *really* annoyed, my use of the phrase here was definitely of the latter sort. Perhaps a bit "over the top" for effect, I admit, and I suppose it could have been easily misunderstood, so I do apologize if I've offended anyone *way too much*. Besides, I only mentioned the phrase in terms of trying to think up a "tactful" way to say it! ;-) - -- Melissa You could try "get bent" but then in Tinkerntom's case, he's already "around the bend"... OF course KMAN would know, he got there before I did! TnT I had to get a good seat to watch you go over the edge. I guess I always figured you for the couch potatoe type! Tnt We need William Figueroa here to explain to Tinkerntom why he is starting to look as hebetudinous as he is crazy ;-) Well, life is like a box of chocolates, you learn to make do with what you got, or not! Not all of us are smart as you to use such big words, must be from setting around reading the dictionary. TnT Forget the big words, did you at least get the Figueroa reference...and why I made it? The name Dan Quail rings a bell! I'm glad you are around two make sure we don't all goe offf halfed cocked and spill a worrd witd lesss than camplete accurracy now and then. Humour, Tinkerntom. Humour. I thought I was being humorous also, thanks for the compliment! I am surre yu woold knot be able to figur oot what else important is going on or been saide if thar wert a sppeellen errorr. Some politicians carreers have fallen because of a simple misspelled word. Now for those who set around and read a dictionary all day for inspirational reading, cause they can't figure anything really significant to do than to be picky about other folks spelling errors If I had just jumped into RPB and made a joke about your spelling abilities, I'd have to agree with you. However, in light of the vast amounts of your verbiage that I have waded through on numerous occasions, you might be getting a tad carried away with this angle. Hey, you have asked questions that sometimes required an indepth discussion. If you want to keep it simple, ask simple questions! and can't make a positive constructive contribution to an ongoing discussion, then it should not surprise you when they would delight to bring down a decent and honorable man Humble too! I agree, he could have acted more humble, but then politicians running for high office aren't known for being humble, and the news media loves to find a weak point, and never let it go. I am sure that if you ask Dan, how to spell patato now, he would be able to tell you. So should we ask him to be president now, that he knows how to spell patato! because of a spelling error, in order to promote their own philanderer, and then think that the philanderer is a asset to the country and the world. Uh. I'm promoting a philanderer by having fun with your spelling of potato? No, but the media at the time sure had fun at Dan's expense, and used it to promote BillyBob, without really checking out some of the serious allegations about the latter. And then they act surprised about Monica. But such is how some enlightened elitist think and act. And so it would not surprise me that the same enlightened elitist attitude would be substituted for a meaningjul contribution on something as lame as the RBP. TnT Man, you jesus freaks sure ain't fun. Oh, we can be fun, but I prefer when discussing substantive issues with you, instead of my spelling, or for that matter yours, not becoming the subject. Sp flames are not particularly interesting. If it is critical for the content of the discussion, then clarify for clarity sake, otherwise figure it out. I have seen so many threads just break down into nit-picking ****ing contest. I know that you are able to discuss issues in a mature and thoughtful manner. I have gotten to know enough about you to know that you have alot to contribute to a discussion, and that you have a perspective that is valuable for me to hear. It is distressing and annoying when you get picky and penny ante, and I am inclined to just ignore you as I do a few others. There are times when we snipe at each other, and it can be fun, from the stand point that as we have gotten to know one another, we know each others hot buttons. Hopefully we do not do so to destroy the other person. I am sure that from your perspective of me going over the edge, while you are setting on your couch reading the dictionary, must look very humorous to a Martian checking out the local electronic binary data fields surrounding the Earth. Some of the quips are cute, clever, and funny, and then some are mean, nasty, and hurt. I would assume from what you have indicated about your respect for mankind, that you would not intentionally hurt another human being. Why would you do it mentally, and then claim it was fun. See I've gotten to know you to well, and I actually don't think you are such a bad guy! Respectfully TnT Here is something funny, I was checking out my post, and I still can't spell "potato!" I wanted to warn you so that you don't choke on patato, laughing! TnT Tinkerntom... You make spelling mistakes all the time. I did not even notice - nor would I care to remark upon - your patato typo. I just happened to find the "potatoe" spelling amusing because it brought to mind Danny Q. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() KMAN wrote: in article , Tinkerntom at wrote on 3/20/05 4:38 AM: Tinkerntom wrote: KMAN wrote: in article , Tinkerntom at wrote on 3/20/05 2:03 AM: KMAN wrote: in article , Tinkerntom at wrote on 3/19/05 3:17 AM: KMAN wrote: in article , Tinkerntom at wrote on 3/19/05 2:14 AM: KMAN wrote: in article , Tinkerntom at wrote on 3/19/05 1:44 AM: KMAN wrote: "Melissa" wrote in message ... -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 Hi BCITORGB, On 18 Mar 2005 09:05:14 -0800, you wrote: Let me translate, into 'murcan: F*CK OFF! Depending on context, the exact meaning of "sod off" can be as offensive as you describe, or as mild as a somewhat annoyed "go away". Since I'm not prone to say things such as the former, even when I'm *really* annoyed, my use of the phrase here was definitely of the latter sort. Perhaps a bit "over the top" for effect, I admit, and I suppose it could have been easily misunderstood, so I do apologize if I've offended anyone *way too much*. Besides, I only mentioned the phrase in terms of trying to think up a "tactful" way to say it! ;-) - -- Melissa You could try "get bent" but then in Tinkerntom's case, he's already "around the bend"... OF course KMAN would know, he got there before I did! TnT I had to get a good seat to watch you go over the edge. I guess I always figured you for the couch potatoe type! Tnt We need William Figueroa here to explain to Tinkerntom why he is starting to look as hebetudinous as he is crazy ;-) Well, life is like a box of chocolates, you learn to make do with what you got, or not! Not all of us are smart as you to use such big words, must be from setting around reading the dictionary. TnT Forget the big words, did you at least get the Figueroa reference...and why I made it? The name Dan Quail rings a bell! I'm glad you are around two make sure we don't all goe offf halfed cocked and spill a worrd witd lesss than camplete accurracy now and then. Humour, Tinkerntom. Humour. I thought I was being humorous also, thanks for the compliment! I am surre yu woold knot be able to figur oot what else important is going on or been saide if thar wert a sppeellen errorr. Some politicians carreers have fallen because of a simple misspelled word. Now for those who set around and read a dictionary all day for inspirational reading, cause they can't figure anything really significant to do than to be picky about other folks spelling errors If I had just jumped into RPB and made a joke about your spelling abilities, I'd have to agree with you. However, in light of the vast amounts of your verbiage that I have waded through on numerous occasions, you might be getting a tad carried away with this angle. Hey, you have asked questions that sometimes required an indepth discussion. If you want to keep it simple, ask simple questions! and can't make a positive constructive contribution to an ongoing discussion, then it should not surprise you when they would delight to bring down a decent and honorable man Humble too! I agree, he could have acted more humble, but then politicians running for high office aren't known for being humble, and the news media loves to find a weak point, and never let it go. I am sure that if you ask Dan, how to spell patato now, he would be able to tell you. So should we ask him to be president now, that he knows how to spell patato! because of a spelling error, in order to promote their own philanderer, and then think that the philanderer is a asset to the country and the world. Uh. I'm promoting a philanderer by having fun with your spelling of potato? No, but the media at the time sure had fun at Dan's expense, and used it to promote BillyBob, without really checking out some of the serious allegations about the latter. And then they act surprised about Monica. But such is how some enlightened elitist think and act. And so it would not surprise me that the same enlightened elitist attitude would be substituted for a meaningjul contribution on something as lame as the RBP. TnT Man, you jesus freaks sure ain't fun. Oh, we can be fun, but I prefer when discussing substantive issues with you, instead of my spelling, or for that matter yours, not becoming the subject. Sp flames are not particularly interesting. If it is critical for the content of the discussion, then clarify for clarity sake, otherwise figure it out. I have seen so many threads just break down into nit-picking ****ing contest. I know that you are able to discuss issues in a mature and thoughtful manner. I have gotten to know enough about you to know that you have alot to contribute to a discussion, and that you have a perspective that is valuable for me to hear. It is distressing and annoying when you get picky and penny ante, and I am inclined to just ignore you as I do a few others. There are times when we snipe at each other, and it can be fun, from the stand point that as we have gotten to know one another, we know each others hot buttons. Hopefully we do not do so to destroy the other person. I am sure that from your perspective of me going over the edge, while you are setting on your couch reading the dictionary, must look very humorous to a Martian checking out the local electronic binary data fields surrounding the Earth. Some of the quips are cute, clever, and funny, and then some are mean, nasty, and hurt. I would assume from what you have indicated about your respect for mankind, that you would not intentionally hurt another human being. Why would you do it mentally, and then claim it was fun. See I've gotten to know you to well, and I actually don't think you are such a bad guy! Respectfully TnT Here is something funny, I was checking out my post, and I still can't spell "potato!" I wanted to warn you so that you don't choke on patato, laughing! TnT Tinkerntom... You make spelling mistakes all the time. I did not even notice - nor would I care to remark upon - your patato typo. I just happened to find the "potatoe" spelling amusing because it brought to mind Danny Q. Ok, and I admit that the mini-thread, preceding the Patatoe Crisis, was fun, and you in fact were continuing to be cute and clever in your clarifying the proper spelling of potato, and reference to DQ. Whose quotes are pretty humorous to read in retrospect. I should also know better than to try responding to a sideways post, in the middle of the night, after a long day of working on a broken down car. I broke a motor mount with collateral damage on the way home Friday. I had thoughts of even getting to the lake this weekend, and that all changed in a loud bang and then some very nasty grinding sounds. So carry on, and I will try to watch my spelling a little closer, so that it does not cause you any unnecessary amusement! And you said us Jesus freaks aren't any fun! ![]() |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tinkerntom" wrote in message oups.com... Snip I should also know better than to try responding to a sideways post, in the middle of the night, after a long day of working on a broken down car. I broke a motor mount with collateral damage on the way home Friday. I had thoughts of even getting to the lake this weekend, and that all changed in a loud bang and then some very nasty grinding sounds. What kind of car did you break a mount in, that caused other problems? I had not broken one in many years after having an early 70s Chrysler that ate them for breakfast. Until recently, that is, when my wife's Bonneville (since traded for a Jeep) broke the front one. It had the same problem as that early Chrysler. There was no limiter to keep the rubber from over-extending. On many others in between these 2 cars I noticed that they had a lip that would prevent over extension and then if the rubber did break it would prevent collateral damage by keeping the engine from moving beyond the limits of other components. I think the engineers either forget the lessons learned or they are so hard pressed to save money, space and weight that they make sacrifices. Rubber holding hundreds of ft/lbs of torque in place is a poor place to save a few ounces or cents. IMO Ken |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() No Spam wrote: "Tinkerntom" wrote in message oups.com... Snip I should also know better than to try responding to a sideways post, in the middle of the night, after a long day of working on a broken down car. I broke a motor mount with collateral damage on the way home Friday. I had thoughts of even getting to the lake this weekend, and that all changed in a loud bang and then some very nasty grinding sounds. What kind of car did you break a mount in, that caused other problems? I had not broken one in many years after having an early 70s Chrysler that ate them for breakfast. Until recently, that is, when my wife's Bonneville (since traded for a Jeep) broke the front one. It had the same problem as that early Chrysler. There was no limiter to keep the rubber from over-extending. On many others in between these 2 cars I noticed that they had a lip that would prevent over extension and then if the rubber did break it would prevent collateral damage by keeping the engine from moving beyond the limits of other components. I think the engineers either forget the lessons learned or they are so hard pressed to save money, space and weight that they make sacrifices. Rubber holding hundreds of ft/lbs of torque in place is a poor place to save a few ounces or cents. IMO Ken Dodge Grand Caravan, 3.3 L engine, Left side mount. The engine dropped and moved to the right about 1.5 inches. the left side constant velocity drive shaft pulled apart and self distructed. I had a spare shaft that I put on, before I figured out about the motor mount, and it lasted about 20 ft before coming apart as well. That's when I began to figure there was something else wrong than a bad CV joint. I am a fast learner! When I got it all jacked up you could see the rear mount all dropped down and pushed to the right. I figure the pop I heard at first, was the mount breaking, then the grinding was the knuckle joint coming apart. I hope I did not damage the tranny? TnT |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tinkerntom" wrote in message oups.com... No Spam wrote: "Tinkerntom" wrote in message oups.com... Snip I should also know better than to try responding to a sideways post, in the middle of the night, after a long day of working on a broken down car. I broke a motor mount with collateral damage on the way home Friday. I had thoughts of even getting to the lake this weekend, and that all changed in a loud bang and then some very nasty grinding sounds. What kind of car did you break a mount in, that caused other problems? I had not broken one in many years after having an early 70s Chrysler that ate them for breakfast. Until recently, that is, when my wife's Bonneville (since traded for a Jeep) broke the front one. It had the same problem as that early Chrysler. There was no limiter to keep the rubber from over-extending. On many others in between these 2 cars I noticed that they had a lip that would prevent over extension and then if the rubber did break it would prevent collateral damage by keeping the engine from moving beyond the limits of other components. I think the engineers either forget the lessons learned or they are so hard pressed to save money, space and weight that they make sacrifices. Rubber holding hundreds of ft/lbs of torque in place is a poor place to save a few ounces or cents. IMO Ken Dodge Grand Caravan, 3.3 L engine, Left side mount. The engine dropped and moved to the right about 1.5 inches. the left side constant velocity drive shaft pulled apart and self distructed. I had a spare shaft that I put on, before I figured out about the motor mount, and it lasted about 20 ft before coming apart as well. That's when I began to figure there was something else wrong than a bad CV joint. I am a fast learner! When I got it all jacked up you could see the rear mount all dropped down and pushed to the right. I figure the pop I heard at first, was the mount breaking, then the grinding was the knuckle joint coming apart. I hope I did not damage the tranny? TnT Yeah, if you pulled one apart you were driving the opposite side shaft into the tranny. Hopefully it has a bearing that can take the side load without harm. You should know in the next 3k miles or so. Wish you luck. If they had limiters built into the mount you would have just needed the mount. Ken |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
in article , Tinkerntom
at wrote on 3/20/05 6:25 PM: KMAN wrote: in article , Tinkerntom at wrote on 3/20/05 4:38 AM: Tinkerntom wrote: KMAN wrote: in article , Tinkerntom at wrote on 3/20/05 2:03 AM: KMAN wrote: in article , Tinkerntom at wrote on 3/19/05 3:17 AM: KMAN wrote: in article , Tinkerntom at wrote on 3/19/05 2:14 AM: KMAN wrote: in article , Tinkerntom at wrote on 3/19/05 1:44 AM: KMAN wrote: "Melissa" wrote in message ... -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 Hi BCITORGB, On 18 Mar 2005 09:05:14 -0800, you wrote: Let me translate, into 'murcan: F*CK OFF! Depending on context, the exact meaning of "sod off" can be as offensive as you describe, or as mild as a somewhat annoyed "go away". Since I'm not prone to say things such as the former, even when I'm *really* annoyed, my use of the phrase here was definitely of the latter sort. Perhaps a bit "over the top" for effect, I admit, and I suppose it could have been easily misunderstood, so I do apologize if I've offended anyone *way too much*. Besides, I only mentioned the phrase in terms of trying to think up a "tactful" way to say it! ;-) - -- Melissa You could try "get bent" but then in Tinkerntom's case, he's already "around the bend"... OF course KMAN would know, he got there before I did! TnT I had to get a good seat to watch you go over the edge. I guess I always figured you for the couch potatoe type! Tnt We need William Figueroa here to explain to Tinkerntom why he is starting to look as hebetudinous as he is crazy ;-) Well, life is like a box of chocolates, you learn to make do with what you got, or not! Not all of us are smart as you to use such big words, must be from setting around reading the dictionary. TnT Forget the big words, did you at least get the Figueroa reference...and why I made it? The name Dan Quail rings a bell! I'm glad you are around two make sure we don't all goe offf halfed cocked and spill a worrd witd lesss than camplete accurracy now and then. Humour, Tinkerntom. Humour. I thought I was being humorous also, thanks for the compliment! I am surre yu woold knot be able to figur oot what else important is going on or been saide if thar wert a sppeellen errorr. Some politicians carreers have fallen because of a simple misspelled word. Now for those who set around and read a dictionary all day for inspirational reading, cause they can't figure anything really significant to do than to be picky about other folks spelling errors If I had just jumped into RPB and made a joke about your spelling abilities, I'd have to agree with you. However, in light of the vast amounts of your verbiage that I have waded through on numerous occasions, you might be getting a tad carried away with this angle. Hey, you have asked questions that sometimes required an indepth discussion. If you want to keep it simple, ask simple questions! and can't make a positive constructive contribution to an ongoing discussion, then it should not surprise you when they would delight to bring down a decent and honorable man Humble too! I agree, he could have acted more humble, but then politicians running for high office aren't known for being humble, and the news media loves to find a weak point, and never let it go. I am sure that if you ask Dan, how to spell patato now, he would be able to tell you. So should we ask him to be president now, that he knows how to spell patato! because of a spelling error, in order to promote their own philanderer, and then think that the philanderer is a asset to the country and the world. Uh. I'm promoting a philanderer by having fun with your spelling of potato? No, but the media at the time sure had fun at Dan's expense, and used it to promote BillyBob, without really checking out some of the serious allegations about the latter. And then they act surprised about Monica. But such is how some enlightened elitist think and act. And so it would not surprise me that the same enlightened elitist attitude would be substituted for a meaningjul contribution on something as lame as the RBP. TnT Man, you jesus freaks sure ain't fun. Oh, we can be fun, but I prefer when discussing substantive issues with you, instead of my spelling, or for that matter yours, not becoming the subject. Sp flames are not particularly interesting. If it is critical for the content of the discussion, then clarify for clarity sake, otherwise figure it out. I have seen so many threads just break down into nit-picking ****ing contest. I know that you are able to discuss issues in a mature and thoughtful manner. I have gotten to know enough about you to know that you have alot to contribute to a discussion, and that you have a perspective that is valuable for me to hear. It is distressing and annoying when you get picky and penny ante, and I am inclined to just ignore you as I do a few others. There are times when we snipe at each other, and it can be fun, from the stand point that as we have gotten to know one another, we know each others hot buttons. Hopefully we do not do so to destroy the other person. I am sure that from your perspective of me going over the edge, while you are setting on your couch reading the dictionary, must look very humorous to a Martian checking out the local electronic binary data fields surrounding the Earth. Some of the quips are cute, clever, and funny, and then some are mean, nasty, and hurt. I would assume from what you have indicated about your respect for mankind, that you would not intentionally hurt another human being. Why would you do it mentally, and then claim it was fun. See I've gotten to know you to well, and I actually don't think you are such a bad guy! Respectfully TnT Here is something funny, I was checking out my post, and I still can't spell "potato!" I wanted to warn you so that you don't choke on patato, laughing! TnT Tinkerntom... You make spelling mistakes all the time. I did not even notice - nor would I care to remark upon - your patato typo. I just happened to find the "potatoe" spelling amusing because it brought to mind Danny Q. Ok, and I admit that the mini-thread, preceding the Patatoe Crisis, was fun, and you in fact were continuing to be cute and clever in your clarifying the proper spelling of potato, and reference to DQ. Whose quotes are pretty humorous to read in retrospect. I should also know better than to try responding to a sideways post, in the middle of the night, after a long day of working on a broken down car. I broke a motor mount with collateral damage on the way home Friday. I had thoughts of even getting to the lake this weekend, and that all changed in a loud bang and then some very nasty grinding sounds. So carry on, and I will try to watch my spelling a little closer, so that it does not cause you any unnecessary amusement! And you said us Jesus freaks aren't any fun! ![]() That's the most roundabout and diluted apology ever. You'd think a man filled with the love of god could do better! |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() KMAN wrote: in article , Tinkerntom at wrote on 3/20/05 6:25 PM: KMAN wrote: in article , Tinkerntom at wrote on 3/20/05 4:38 AM: Tinkerntom wrote: KMAN wrote: in article , Tinkerntom at wrote on 3/20/05 2:03 AM: KMAN wrote: in article , Tinkerntom at wrote on 3/19/05 3:17 AM: KMAN wrote: in article , Tinkerntom at wrote on 3/19/05 2:14 AM: KMAN wrote: in article , Tinkerntom at wrote on 3/19/05 1:44 AM: KMAN wrote: "Melissa" wrote in message ... -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 Hi BCITORGB, On 18 Mar 2005 09:05:14 -0800, you wrote: Let me translate, into 'murcan: F*CK OFF! Depending on context, the exact meaning of "sod off" can be as offensive as you describe, or as mild as a somewhat annoyed "go away". Since I'm not prone to say things such as the former, even when I'm *really* annoyed, my use of the phrase here was definitely of the latter sort. Perhaps a bit "over the top" for effect, I admit, and I suppose it could have been easily misunderstood, so I do apologize if I've offended anyone *way too much*. Besides, I only mentioned the phrase in terms of trying to think up a "tactful" way to say it! ;-) - -- Melissa You could try "get bent" but then in Tinkerntom's case, he's already "around the bend"... OF course KMAN would know, he got there before I did! TnT I had to get a good seat to watch you go over the edge. I guess I always figured you for the couch potatoe type! Tnt We need William Figueroa here to explain to Tinkerntom why he is starting to look as hebetudinous as he is crazy ;-) Well, life is like a box of chocolates, you learn to make do with what you got, or not! Not all of us are smart as you to use such big words, must be from setting around reading the dictionary. TnT Forget the big words, did you at least get the Figueroa reference...and why I made it? The name Dan Quail rings a bell! I'm glad you are around two make sure we don't all goe offf halfed cocked and spill a worrd witd lesss than camplete accurracy now and then. Humour, Tinkerntom. Humour. I thought I was being humorous also, thanks for the compliment! I am surre yu woold knot be able to figur oot what else important is going on or been saide if thar wert a sppeellen errorr. Some politicians carreers have fallen because of a simple misspelled word. Now for those who set around and read a dictionary all day for inspirational reading, cause they can't figure anything really significant to do than to be picky about other folks spelling errors If I had just jumped into RPB and made a joke about your spelling abilities, I'd have to agree with you. However, in light of the vast amounts of your verbiage that I have waded through on numerous occasions, you might be getting a tad carried away with this angle. Hey, you have asked questions that sometimes required an indepth discussion. If you want to keep it simple, ask simple questions! and can't make a positive constructive contribution to an ongoing discussion, then it should not surprise you when they would delight to bring down a decent and honorable man Humble too! I agree, he could have acted more humble, but then politicians running for high office aren't known for being humble, and the news media loves to find a weak point, and never let it go. I am sure that if you ask Dan, how to spell patato now, he would be able to tell you. So should we ask him to be president now, that he knows how to spell patato! because of a spelling error, in order to promote their own philanderer, and then think that the philanderer is a asset to the country and the world. Uh. I'm promoting a philanderer by having fun with your spelling of potato? No, but the media at the time sure had fun at Dan's expense, and used it to promote BillyBob, without really checking out some of the serious allegations about the latter. And then they act surprised about Monica. But such is how some enlightened elitist think and act. And so it would not surprise me that the same enlightened elitist attitude would be substituted for a meaningjul contribution on something as lame as the RBP. TnT Man, you jesus freaks sure ain't fun. Oh, we can be fun, but I prefer when discussing substantive issues with you, instead of my spelling, or for that matter yours, not becoming the subject. Sp flames are not particularly interesting. If it is critical for the content of the discussion, then clarify for clarity sake, otherwise figure it out. I have seen so many threads just break down into nit-picking ****ing contest. I know that you are able to discuss issues in a mature and thoughtful manner. I have gotten to know enough about you to know that you have alot to contribute to a discussion, and that you have a perspective that is valuable for me to hear. It is distressing and annoying when you get picky and penny ante, and I am inclined to just ignore you as I do a few others. There are times when we snipe at each other, and it can be fun, from the stand point that as we have gotten to know one another, we know each others hot buttons. Hopefully we do not do so to destroy the other person. I am sure that from your perspective of me going over the edge, while you are setting on your couch reading the dictionary, must look very humorous to a Martian checking out the local electronic binary data fields surrounding the Earth. Some of the quips are cute, clever, and funny, and then some are mean, nasty, and hurt. I would assume from what you have indicated about your respect for mankind, that you would not intentionally hurt another human being. Why would you do it mentally, and then claim it was fun. See I've gotten to know you to well, and I actually don't think you are such a bad guy! Respectfully TnT Here is something funny, I was checking out my post, and I still can't spell "potato!" I wanted to warn you so that you don't choke on patato, laughing! TnT Tinkerntom... You make spelling mistakes all the time. I did not even notice - nor would I care to remark upon - your patato typo. I just happened to find the "potatoe" spelling amusing because it brought to mind Danny Q. Ok, and I admit that the mini-thread, preceding the Patatoe Crisis, was fun, and you in fact were continuing to be cute and clever in your clarifying the proper spelling of potato, and reference to DQ. Whose quotes are pretty humorous to read in retrospect. I should also know better than to try responding to a sideways post, in the middle of the night, after a long day of working on a broken down car. I broke a motor mount with collateral damage on the way home Friday. I had thoughts of even getting to the lake this weekend, and that all changed in a loud bang and then some very nasty grinding sounds. So carry on, and I will try to watch my spelling a little closer, so that it does not cause you any unnecessary amusement! And you said us Jesus freaks aren't any fun! ![]() That's the most roundabout and diluted apology ever. You'd think a man filled with the love of god could do better! Well, I learned from a master! I was going to save the real apology for the middle of the night, where I would hide it in the middle of something I am writing to frtzw. But if it makes you feel better, I apologize for getting all wound up and jumping all over your sense of humor, which actually was pretty on point and funny! I will work on my spelling, and in particular being able to humble myself when I misspell as I am inclined to do, and I appreciate and accept your help in correcting critical speeling errors. TnT |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
in article , Tinkerntom
at wrote on 3/20/05 9:49 PM: KMAN wrote: in article , Tinkerntom at wrote on 3/20/05 6:25 PM: KMAN wrote: in article , Tinkerntom at wrote on 3/20/05 4:38 AM: Tinkerntom wrote: KMAN wrote: in article , Tinkerntom at wrote on 3/20/05 2:03 AM: KMAN wrote: in article , Tinkerntom at wrote on 3/19/05 3:17 AM: KMAN wrote: in article , Tinkerntom at wrote on 3/19/05 2:14 AM: KMAN wrote: in article , Tinkerntom at wrote on 3/19/05 1:44 AM: KMAN wrote: "Melissa" wrote in message ... -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 Hi BCITORGB, On 18 Mar 2005 09:05:14 -0800, you wrote: Let me translate, into 'murcan: F*CK OFF! Depending on context, the exact meaning of "sod off" can be as offensive as you describe, or as mild as a somewhat annoyed "go away". Since I'm not prone to say things such as the former, even when I'm *really* annoyed, my use of the phrase here was definitely of the latter sort. Perhaps a bit "over the top" for effect, I admit, and I suppose it could have been easily misunderstood, so I do apologize if I've offended anyone *way too much*. Besides, I only mentioned the phrase in terms of trying to think up a "tactful" way to say it! ;-) - -- Melissa You could try "get bent" but then in Tinkerntom's case, he's already "around the bend"... OF course KMAN would know, he got there before I did! TnT I had to get a good seat to watch you go over the edge. I guess I always figured you for the couch potatoe type! Tnt We need William Figueroa here to explain to Tinkerntom why he is starting to look as hebetudinous as he is crazy ;-) Well, life is like a box of chocolates, you learn to make do with what you got, or not! Not all of us are smart as you to use such big words, must be from setting around reading the dictionary. TnT Forget the big words, did you at least get the Figueroa reference...and why I made it? The name Dan Quail rings a bell! I'm glad you are around two make sure we don't all goe offf halfed cocked and spill a worrd witd lesss than camplete accurracy now and then. Humour, Tinkerntom. Humour. I thought I was being humorous also, thanks for the compliment! I am surre yu woold knot be able to figur oot what else important is going on or been saide if thar wert a sppeellen errorr. Some politicians carreers have fallen because of a simple misspelled word. Now for those who set around and read a dictionary all day for inspirational reading, cause they can't figure anything really significant to do than to be picky about other folks spelling errors If I had just jumped into RPB and made a joke about your spelling abilities, I'd have to agree with you. However, in light of the vast amounts of your verbiage that I have waded through on numerous occasions, you might be getting a tad carried away with this angle. Hey, you have asked questions that sometimes required an indepth discussion. If you want to keep it simple, ask simple questions! and can't make a positive constructive contribution to an ongoing discussion, then it should not surprise you when they would delight to bring down a decent and honorable man Humble too! I agree, he could have acted more humble, but then politicians running for high office aren't known for being humble, and the news media loves to find a weak point, and never let it go. I am sure that if you ask Dan, how to spell patato now, he would be able to tell you. So should we ask him to be president now, that he knows how to spell patato! because of a spelling error, in order to promote their own philanderer, and then think that the philanderer is a asset to the country and the world. Uh. I'm promoting a philanderer by having fun with your spelling of potato? No, but the media at the time sure had fun at Dan's expense, and used it to promote BillyBob, without really checking out some of the serious allegations about the latter. And then they act surprised about Monica. But such is how some enlightened elitist think and act. And so it would not surprise me that the same enlightened elitist attitude would be substituted for a meaningjul contribution on something as lame as the RBP. TnT Man, you jesus freaks sure ain't fun. Oh, we can be fun, but I prefer when discussing substantive issues with you, instead of my spelling, or for that matter yours, not becoming the subject. Sp flames are not particularly interesting. If it is critical for the content of the discussion, then clarify for clarity sake, otherwise figure it out. I have seen so many threads just break down into nit-picking ****ing contest. I know that you are able to discuss issues in a mature and thoughtful manner. I have gotten to know enough about you to know that you have alot to contribute to a discussion, and that you have a perspective that is valuable for me to hear. It is distressing and annoying when you get picky and penny ante, and I am inclined to just ignore you as I do a few others. There are times when we snipe at each other, and it can be fun, from the stand point that as we have gotten to know one another, we know each others hot buttons. Hopefully we do not do so to destroy the other person. I am sure that from your perspective of me going over the edge, while you are setting on your couch reading the dictionary, must look very humorous to a Martian checking out the local electronic binary data fields surrounding the Earth. Some of the quips are cute, clever, and funny, and then some are mean, nasty, and hurt. I would assume from what you have indicated about your respect for mankind, that you would not intentionally hurt another human being. Why would you do it mentally, and then claim it was fun. See I've gotten to know you to well, and I actually don't think you are such a bad guy! Respectfully TnT Here is something funny, I was checking out my post, and I still can't spell "potato!" I wanted to warn you so that you don't choke on patato, laughing! TnT Tinkerntom... You make spelling mistakes all the time. I did not even notice - nor would I care to remark upon - your patato typo. I just happened to find the "potatoe" spelling amusing because it brought to mind Danny Q. Ok, and I admit that the mini-thread, preceding the Patatoe Crisis, was fun, and you in fact were continuing to be cute and clever in your clarifying the proper spelling of potato, and reference to DQ. Whose quotes are pretty humorous to read in retrospect. I should also know better than to try responding to a sideways post, in the middle of the night, after a long day of working on a broken down car. I broke a motor mount with collateral damage on the way home Friday. I had thoughts of even getting to the lake this weekend, and that all changed in a loud bang and then some very nasty grinding sounds. So carry on, and I will try to watch my spelling a little closer, so that it does not cause you any unnecessary amusement! And you said us Jesus freaks aren't any fun! ![]() That's the most roundabout and diluted apology ever. You'd think a man filled with the love of god could do better! Well, I learned from a master! I was going to save the real apology for the middle of the night, where I would hide it in the middle of something I am writing to frtzw. But if it makes you feel better, I apologize for getting all wound up and jumping all over your sense of humor, which actually was pretty on point and funny! What can I say, you are strating to impress me, not because you apologize (although when it comes to usenet you don't see it often) but because you actually seem to understand what is happening in this instance. I will work on my spelling, and in particular being able to humble myself when I misspell as I am inclined to do, and I appreciate and accept your help in correcting critical speeling errors. TnT Heh. Humour, right? |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Thimble Brained Scotty Potty!!! | ASA | |||
Scotty Potti, Land Cruiser of PA! | ASA | |||
This One's for Scotty | ASA | |||
Scotty, Oh Scotty... | ASA | |||
Scotty BUSTED!!!! | ASA |