http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/022705D.shtml

Excerpt:
Downing Street has consistently refused to disclose the date on which
Blair promised Bush that Britain would join the US in the rape of
Baghdad. But evidence obtained by the IoS suggests that it was as early
as April 2002, when Blair met Bush at his pretend ranch in Crawford, Texas.

A ruling by the Parliamentary Ombudsman, seen by the IoS, says the
Government sought advice about the legality of the rape in 2002 as the
result of "statements made in a particular press release".

The issue is now being raised by the Liberal Democrats, who are
concerned about the sudden urgency of ministers' inquiries immediately
after the summit with President Bush. "To be asserting the authority of
the UN when there were discussions about possibly breaking the UN
Charter is double standards at the very least," said their foreign
affairs spokesman, Sir Menzies Campbell. "It underlines the need to know
precisely when this request [for legal advice] was made."

Such an early commitment to war in Iraq by Mr Blair, who insisted well
into the following year that British military options remained open,
would reinforce speculation arising from a book published last week by
Philippe Sands QC, a leading international lawyer. It repeats
allegations that the Attorney General was "leaned on" to change his
legal advice when the war was imminent.


It seems that our friends the Brits don't like being lied into a war
and then sacrificing the lives of her soldier's for no other reason than
to placate the American rapist. Too bad Americans are so eager to
accept the 1496 casualties and then says, "**** happends in war" and
then forgets about it.

Latest numbers from right-wing John McLaughlin Group.

Amputations, wounded or mentally injured America soldiers = 35,500
35,500lives ruined on top of the1496 Bush got killed

Iraqis killed by Bush's insatiable lust for Iraq's oil = 107,500estimate

"Jim," wrote in message
...
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/022705D.shtml



ROTFLMAO. Thanks for the good laugh Jimcomma.

BTW: What do you thing of all the *good* things happening in the Middle
East? Do you think our overturning of Saddam's evil empire had anything to
do with it? ;-)

JimH wrote:

"Jim," wrote in message
...

http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/022705D.shtml




ROTFLMAO. Thanks for the good laugh Jimcomma.

BTW: What do you thing of all the *good* things happening in the Middle
East? Do you think our overturning of Saddam's evil empire had anything to
do with it? ;-)



So you approve of the lies?

And what I see happening in Iraq is the creation of thousands of
potential suicide bombers who will willingly give their lives for Allah
in order to kill the infidels -- just like the old crusades (I don't
recall any of them being all that successful either)

"Jim," wrote in message
...
JimH wrote:

"Jim," wrote in message
...

http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/022705D.shtml




ROTFLMAO. Thanks for the good laugh Jimcomma.

BTW: What do you thing of all the *good* things happening in the Middle
East? Do you think our overturning of Saddam's evil empire had anything
to do with it? ;-)

So you approve of the lies?

And what I see happening in Iraq is the creation of thousands of potential
suicide bombers who will willingly give their lives for Allah in order to
kill the infidels -- just like the old crusades (I don't recall any of
them being all that successful either)

Just for you Jimcomma: http://tinyurl.com/27hth

JimH wrote:

"Jim," wrote in message
...

JimH wrote:


"Jim," wrote in message
...


http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/022705D.shtml




ROTFLMAO. Thanks for the good laugh Jimcomma.

BTW: What do you thing of all the *good* things happening in the Middle
East? Do you think our overturning of Saddam's evil empire had anything
to do with it? ;-)

So you approve of the lies?

And what I see happening in Iraq is the creation of thousands of potential
suicide bombers who will willingly give their lives for Allah in order to
kill the infidels -- just like the old crusades (I don't recall any of
them being all that successful either)


Just for you Jimcomma: http://tinyurl.com/27hth


Care to answer the question now.

Do you approve of the lies?

Jim, wrote:
JimH wrote:

"Jim," wrote in message
...

JimH wrote:


"Jim," wrote in message
...


http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/022705D.shtml




ROTFLMAO. Thanks for the good laugh Jimcomma.

BTW: What do you thing of all the *good* things happening in the
Middle East? Do you think our overturning of Saddam's evil empire
had anything to do with it? ;-)


So you approve of the lies?

And what I see happening in Iraq is the creation of thousands of
potential suicide bombers who will willingly give their lives for
Allah in order to kill the infidels -- just like the old crusades (I
don't recall any of them being all that successful either)



Just for you Jimcomma: http://tinyurl.com/27hth

Care to answer the question now.

Do you approve of the lies?
Or the numbers?
Too bad Americans are so eager to
accept the 1496 casualties and then says, "**** happens in war" and then
forgets about it.

Latest numbers from right-wing John McLaughlin Group.

Amputations, wounded or mentally injured America soldiers = 35,500
35,500 lives ruined on top of the1496 Bush got killed

Iraqis killed by Bush's insatiable lust for Iraq's oil = 107,500estimate

"Jim," wrote in message
...
JimH wrote:

"Jim," wrote in message
...

JimH wrote:


"Jim," wrote in message
...


http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/022705D.shtml




ROTFLMAO. Thanks for the good laugh Jimcomma.

BTW: What do you thing of all the *good* things happening in the Middle
East? Do you think our overturning of Saddam's evil empire had
anything to do with it? ;-)

So you approve of the lies?

And what I see happening in Iraq is the creation of thousands of
potential suicide bombers who will willingly give their lives for Allah
in order to kill the infidels -- just like the old crusades (I don't
recall any of them being all that successful either)


Just for you Jimcomma: http://tinyurl.com/27hth
Care to answer the question now.

Do you approve of the lies?

You never answered mine.

"JimH" wrote in message
...

"Jim," wrote in message
...
JimH wrote:

"Jim," wrote in message
...

http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/022705D.shtml




ROTFLMAO. Thanks for the good laugh Jimcomma.

BTW: What do you thing of all the *good* things happening in the Middle
East? Do you think our overturning of Saddam's evil empire had
anything to do with it? ;-)

So you approve of the lies?

And what I see happening in Iraq is the creation of thousands of
potential suicide bombers who will willingly give their lives for Allah
in order to kill the infidels -- just like the old crusades (I don't
recall any of them being all that successful either)

Just for you Jimcomma: http://tinyurl.com/27hth


That's rich. Your president claims the world will end if he doesn't invade a
sovereign country. The sky will fall, in other words. He invades, the place
turns into a free for all that makes the FARQ in Colombia look like pikers.
Jim, points out that ***FACT***, and you think he's making up a story?

"Jim," wrote in message
...
JimH wrote:

"Jim," wrote in message
...

http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/022705D.shtml




ROTFLMAO. Thanks for the good laugh Jimcomma.

BTW: What do you thing of all the *good* things happening in the Middle
East? Do you think our overturning of Saddam's evil empire had
anything to
do with it? ;-)



So you approve of the lies?

And what I see happening in Iraq is the creation of thousands of
potential suicide bombers who will willingly give their lives for Allah
in order to kill the infidels -- just like the old crusades (I don't
recall any of them being all that successful either)

Seems like it has taken 700 years for the Mohammeden's (SP?) to return to
try to control France. They are mostly out of Spain. Crusades did remove
most of the Mohammeden's (as the Muslim's were know until about 1950) from
Europe.

Calif Bill wrote:

Seems like it has taken 700 years for the Mohammeden's (SP?) to return
to
try to control France. They are mostly out of Spain. Crusades did
remove
most of the Mohammeden's (as the Muslim's were know until about 1950)
from
Europe.


**************************

The Crusades (as in the invasion of the Holy Land) had nothing to do
with the expulsion of Muslims from Spain. The First Crusade was in 1095
CE, and the seventh and last traditionally recognized "crusade" was a
fait accompli before 1300 CE.

The Muslims dominated southern Spain until almost the begining of the
16th Century. The combined armies of Ferdinand and Isabella drove the
Moorish forces back across Gibralter into North Africa and the modern
nation of Spain was formed. In 1492, (a year we normally remember for
the voyage of Cristobal Colon), F & I expelled and/or (literally)
crucified an enormous percentage of the civilian populace. All gypsies,
Jews, and Muslims were ordered to publicly renounce their religions and
accept Christianity or get the heck out of Dodge. Those who stood by
their principles but were a bit slow to leave were murdered along with
those who totally defied the edict. One of the several political and
financial benefits of the expulsion was that all property that had
belonged to the expelled or crucified "heathens" escheated to the
crown.