NOYB wrote:
.... bin Laden should have been captured or killed the minute that he
declared war on the US.


So why hasn't Bush captured him yet?

Fact: Approx four years after Bin Laden had "declared war" on the US,
his organization was unable to carry out an attack on US soil.

Fact: The President of the U.S. cannot simply order any person on earth
killed.

Fact: Bush has *still* not managed to capture of kill Bin Laden

Fact: there is no proven link between Iraq and anti-US terrorism

DSK

"DSK" wrote in message
. ..
NOYB wrote:
.... bin Laden should have been captured or killed the minute that he
declared war on the US.


So why hasn't Bush captured him yet?

Different circumstances. bin Laden was operating in public soon after his
declaration of war. The Sudanese had him and offered him to us.




Fact: Approx four years after Bin Laden had "declared war" on the US, his
organization was unable to carry out an attack on US soil.

But he was targeting Americans with attacks that came approximately once
every 6 months...while he was training terrorists to carry out the 9/11
attack.



Fact: The President of the U.S. cannot simply order any person on earth
killed.

That's not a fact. That's an opinion.


Fact: Bush has *still* not managed to capture of kill Bin Laden

Could be another opinion. Where is he?


Fact: there is no proven link between Iraq and anti-US terrorism

There are dozens of proven links...but you've chosen not to believe them.

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"DSK" wrote in message
. ..
NOYB wrote:
.... bin Laden should have been captured or killed the minute that he
declared war on the US.


So why hasn't Bush captured him yet?

Different circumstances. bin Laden was operating in public soon after his
declaration of war. The Sudanese had him and offered him to us.




Fact: Approx four years after Bin Laden had "declared war" on the US, his
organization was unable to carry out an attack on US soil.

But he was targeting Americans with attacks that came approximately once
every 6 months...while he was training terrorists to carry out the 9/11
attack.



Fact: The President of the U.S. cannot simply order any person on earth
killed.

That's not a fact. That's an opinion.


Fact: Bush has *still* not managed to capture of kill Bin Laden

Could be another opinion. Where is he?

It is not necessarrily a bad thing that he is still alive......significant
resources are being used to protect him, resources that otherwise could be
used to attack us.




Fact: there is no proven link between Iraq and anti-US terrorism

There are dozens of proven links...but you've chosen not to believe them.

Fact: Bush has *still* not managed to capture of kill Bin Laden

Could be another opinion. Where is he?


P.Fritz wrote:
It is not necessarrily a bad thing that he is still alive......significant
resources are being used to protect him, resources that otherwise could be
used to attack us.


That's the smartest thing any of you "neo-cons" have had to say on the
subject. You should suggest that to the White House press office,
they're running short of half-plausible excuses.

It's still a lame excuse, though. Why did President Bush say "We *will*
get those responsible" and then just shrug it off? Doesn't that carry
*any* weight with you people?

DSK

On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 12:24:37 -0500, DSK wrote:


Fact: Bush has *still* not managed to capture of kill Bin Laden

Could be another opinion. Where is he?


P.Fritz wrote:
It is not necessarrily a bad thing that he is still alive......significant
resources are being used to protect him, resources that otherwise could be
used to attack us.


That's the smartest thing any of you "neo-cons" have had to say on the
subject. You should suggest that to the White House press office,
they're running short of half-plausible excuses.

It's still a lame excuse, though. Why did President Bush say "We *will*
get those responsible" and then just shrug it off? Doesn't that carry
*any* weight with you people?

DSK

Do you espouse attacking Pakistan to get him?


John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 12:24:37 -0500, DSK wrote:


Fact: Bush has *still* not managed to capture of kill Bin Laden

Could be another opinion. Where is he?


P.Fritz wrote:
It is not necessarrily a bad thing that he is still
alive......significant
resources are being used to protect him, resources that otherwise
could be
used to attack us.


That's the smartest thing any of you "neo-cons" have had to say on the
subject. You should suggest that to the White House press office,
they're running short of half-plausible excuses.

It's still a lame excuse, though. Why did President Bush say "We *will*
get those responsible" and then just shrug it off? Doesn't that carry
*any* weight with you people?

DSK

Do you espouse attacking Pakistan to get him?

It is only a lame excuse to the brain dead liebrals.....................Of
course Bush had to say we will get them, that forced bin laden into hiding
and expending the resources to hide.
Very similar to when Reagan announced the Star Wars program, it forced the
USSR into a mode that ultimately caused them to self destruct. The fact
that 'Star Wars' was never fully developed didn't matter, only the fiinal
outcome did.

Once again, liebrals display the static thinking that will ultimately doom
them.




John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

So why hasn't Bush captured him yet?


Different circumstances. bin Laden was operating in public soon after his
declaration of war. The Sudanese had him and offered him to us.


Ah well, it was "different circumstances" wasn't it? For one thing, he
had not committed any crimes against the U.S. as yet.

Just like the "different circumstances" that Bush ordered US troops out
of eastern Afghanistan where they were pursuing Bin Laden... after he
had claimed responsibility for Sept 11th let me remind you...

Fact: The President of the U.S. cannot simply order any person on earth
killed.


NOYB wrote:
That's not a fact. That's an opinion.


That was not expressed well... the President of the U.S. does not have
the legal authority to simply order any person earth killed. The term
for that is "murder" and it's frowned on.




Fact: Bush has *still* not managed to capture of kill Bin Laden


Could be another opinion. Where is he?


Oh right.


Fact: there is no proven link between Iraq and anti-US terrorism


There are dozens of proven links...but you've chosen not to believe them.


Wrong. There are no proven links. None. That's why, instead of offering
proof and having everybody say, "Oh you were right, so sorry" and that's
the end of the issue, you are continuing to rant & rave.

You have chosen to believe a fairy tale, and to stretch back 20+ years,
in the attempt to justify Bush's invasion.

DSK