"JimH" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
oups.com...
Why stir thing up? Oh well.

At least a cut n' paste is on a more adult level than a picture of a
couple of hillbillies standing outside a single wide, some childish
assertion that it represents another poster's wedding picture, and four
grammar school pig-pilers chiming in on a gang-bang attack post. Bad as
this is, that was the low point of the week so far.


And basskisser was one who should have been respected here Chuck? He
earned every bit of that piece of satire I posted, and you know it.

Why am I not surprised he is defending asslicker?

P. Fritz wote:

Why am I not surprised he is defending asslicker?

*****************

Perhaps because you lack the noodles to realize I'm not "defending"
anybody.

Funny, I didn't even mention bass's name in my comment.
Nor did I mention yours, or JimH's.....but you guys sure knew who I was
talking about (and came out swinging) when I remarked about childish
behavior, didn't you?

Posting the photo was a stupid stunt. It reminds me of grade school,
where kids draw funny, distorted pictures of one another and hold them
up to the class to try to get a laugh. The first guy
doesn't know any better and this sort of behavior typifies his
"contributions" to the NG. The three or four guys who piled on
apparently don't know any better, either. If the shoe fits, wear it
proudly. If not, don't sweat it. But save all the "it was a right,
adult, or justified thing to do" nonsense for like-minded little
bullies who hide behind computers and design entire threads around
personal attacks.

wrote in message
ups.com...
P. Fritz wote:

Why am I not surprised he is defending asslicker?

*****************

Perhaps because you lack the noodles to realize I'm not "defending"
anybody.

Funny, I didn't even mention bass's name in my comment.
Nor did I mention yours, or JimH's.....but you guys sure knew who I was
talking about (and came out swinging) when I remarked about childish
behavior, didn't you?

Posting the photo was a stupid stunt. It reminds me of grade school,
where kids draw funny, distorted pictures of one another and hold them
up to the class to try to get a laugh. The first guy
doesn't know any better and this sort of behavior typifies his
"contributions" to the NG. The three or four guys who piled on
apparently don't know any better, either. If the shoe fits, wear it
proudly. If not, don't sweat it. But save all the "it was a right,
adult, or justified thing to do" nonsense for like-minded little
bullies who hide behind computers and design entire threads around
personal attacks.


Lighten up Chucky. Then go find a sense of humor. It was all in good fun.
And the guy was well deserving of the joke.

As I said before if you are going to slam me at least be man enough to
direct it to me by stating my name.

And start using some self discipline by obeying the rules *you* set for this
NG.

How was the picture any different than you calling others "grammar school
pig-pillers?


wrote in message
oups.com...
Why stir thing up? Oh well.

At least a cut n' paste is on a more adult level than a picture of a
couple of hillbillies standing outside a single wide, some childish
assertion that it represents another poster's wedding picture, and four
grammar school pig-pilers chiming in on a gang-bang attack post. Bad as
this is, that was the low point of the week so far.

Do as Chucky says.....not as he does. ;-)


"Dr. Jonathan Smithers, MD Phd." wrote in message
...
How was the picture any different than you calling others "grammar school
pig-pillers?


wrote in message
oups.com...
Why stir thing up? Oh well.

At least a cut n' paste is on a more adult level than a picture of a
couple of hillbillies standing outside a single wide, some childish
assertion that it represents another poster's wedding picture, and four
grammar school pig-pilers chiming in on a gang-bang attack post. Bad as
this is, that was the low point of the week so far.

Dr. Jonathan Shmithers asked:

How was the picture any different than you calling others "grammar
school
pig-pillers?


*********************

How can you be so obtuse?

The comment about grammar school pig-pilers was an opinion expressed
about a deliberate behavior exhibited in this forum.

To gratify a sick, twisted, predatory sense of "humor", one of your
crew posted a photo (so full of stereoypes it almost had to be staged)
and claimed "This is the recent wedding photo for so and so." In fact,
the predatory personality felt the idea was so inspired it deserved an
entire thread of its own.

An easily predicted group of folks jumped on the sick, twisted,
predatory bandwagon with celebratory high fives and gratuitous reach
arounds.

What portion of the previous two paragraphs would you care to factually
refute?

Now let's address the photo, as you're asking how posting the photo
compares to expressing an opinion that doing so was juvenile. Unlike
the activites upon which I based my opinion, all of which were easily
observable in the NG, the photo was not based in fact or reality. It
was, as I have said, the internet equivalent of a grade school drawing
with distorted features and some poor *******'s name penciled in below.

The hillbillie picture thread didn't say a thing about the guy it was
purported to represent, but it spoke volumes about the guy who launched
the thread and the easily led group of hypocritical psychophant
pile-ons unable to distinguish between adult or juvenile behaviors.

wrote in message
oups.com...
Dr. Jonathan Shmithers asked:

How was the picture any different than you calling others "grammar
school
pig-pillers?


*********************

How can you be so obtuse?

The comment about grammar school pig-pilers was an opinion expressed
about a deliberate behavior exhibited in this forum.

To gratify a sick, twisted, predatory sense of "humor", one of your
crew posted a photo (so full of stereoypes it almost had to be staged)
and claimed "This is the recent wedding photo for so and so." In fact,
the predatory personality felt the idea was so inspired it deserved an
entire thread of its own.

An easily predicted group of folks jumped on the sick, twisted,
predatory bandwagon with celebratory high fives and gratuitous reach
arounds.

What portion of the previous two paragraphs would you care to factually
refute?

Now let's address the photo, as you're asking how posting the photo
compares to expressing an opinion that doing so was juvenile. Unlike
the activites upon which I based my opinion, all of which were easily
observable in the NG, the photo was not based in fact or reality. It
was, as I have said, the internet equivalent of a grade school drawing
with distorted features and some poor *******'s name penciled in below.

The hillbillie picture thread didn't say a thing about the guy it was
purported to represent, but it spoke volumes about the guy who launched
the thread and the easily led group of hypocritical psychophant
pile-ons unable to distinguish between adult or juvenile behaviors.



A five minute google search turned up these Chucky classics:

=============================================
Will I continue to respond to childish name calling and personal insult? Not
for long.



Name calling and personal attack? Desperate, fearful acts that betray a weak
personality.



As you're not an extreme idiot, I'm genuinely surprised you would lump *all*
of
any group into a single category.



Are you as much an idiot as a wise ass, xxxxx?



Ah, whatsa matter xxxxxx? The big bad discussion get so cereberal for ya
that
you're left with no recourse except launching unprovoked personal attacks?
What a lightweight.



xxxxx is an incompetant and blithering idiot



Probably a good thing there's no truth to the rumor that your ass is where
your
brains are, you'd be a stupid frickin' Jose by now.



Or is enough to imply that people who have not been impressed with
some aspects of his intellectual profile are just too stupid to appreciate
the
man's obvious brilliance?



I've been taking lessons from an asshole in Ohio. The half-witted SOB
never posts a line without attacking somebody, and then runs crying
about his hurt feelings whenever anybody says "boo" back at him. My
little sister used to act the same way, before she grew out of it. Come
to think of it, Jim, you live in Ohio too! On the off chance that you
run into the asshole I'm referring to, give him my regards, OK?

================================================== =============



I pasted only a fraction of what I found, and this was with a search of only
3 foul words.



A 5 minute search.



Do as I say, not as I do.....eh Chuck?

In article , says...


I pasted only a fraction of what I found, and this was with a search of only
3 foul words.

Feeble attempt at misdirection.

wrote in message
oups.com...
Dr. Jonathan Shmithers asked:

How was the picture any different than you calling others "grammar
school
pig-pillers?


*********************

How can you be so obtuse?

The comment about grammar school pig-pilers was an opinion expressed
about a deliberate behavior exhibited in this forum.


So was the picture Chucky.

Hypocrisy thy name is Chuck Gould.

Gould,

This post reminds me of Netsock repeatedly posting OT messages complaining
about Off topic messages.

The picture was an attempt at a joke, and an opinion on the intellectually
level of Basskisser. No one expected anyone to believe the picture was
real. This post in which you call a number of people "sick and twisted",and
"predatory" is your opinion.

The only difference between these two opinions, is one person attempted to
use humor and you did not.




wrote in message
oups.com...
Dr. Jonathan Shmithers asked:

How was the picture any different than you calling others "grammar
school
pig-pillers?


*********************

How can you be so obtuse?

The comment about grammar school pig-pilers was an opinion expressed
about a deliberate behavior exhibited in this forum.

To gratify a sick, twisted, predatory sense of "humor", one of your
crew posted a photo (so full of stereoypes it almost had to be staged)
and claimed "This is the recent wedding photo for so and so." In fact,
the predatory personality felt the idea was so inspired it deserved an
entire thread of its own.

An easily predicted group of folks jumped on the sick, twisted,
predatory bandwagon with celebratory high fives and gratuitous reach
arounds.

What portion of the previous two paragraphs would you care to factually
refute?

Now let's address the photo, as you're asking how posting the photo
compares to expressing an opinion that doing so was juvenile. Unlike
the activites upon which I based my opinion, all of which were easily
observable in the NG, the photo was not based in fact or reality. It
was, as I have said, the internet equivalent of a grade school drawing
with distorted features and some poor *******'s name penciled in below.

The hillbillie picture thread didn't say a thing about the guy it was
purported to represent, but it spoke volumes about the guy who launched
the thread and the easily led group of hypocritical psychophant
pile-ons unable to distinguish between adult or juvenile behaviors.