Coal tar has been in use in the Dutch canals for a 100 years successfully.
It is still in use. Your risk to corrosion is on the inside, not the
outside. Even there tar works very well unless it is exposed to oil or fuel.
I have seen examples of steel hulls immersed in salt water unpainted and
suffer 0 corrosion except at the air/water margin. Condensation on the
inside is a whole different matter. There the best protection is urethane
foam above the water line and tar below.
Steve
wrote in message
...
Hi,

I'm considering buying a houseboat with a steel bottom. New steel
was put on 4 years ago, and treated with coal tar epoxy, supposedly.
I was told that the coal tar treatment will last for a long time. Can
anyone tell me if the coal tar treatment is really good for a long time,
like 30 years or something? If it is, then why doesn't everyone use
it? It it's not, then how long is it good for, what to do, and when, in
the future?

Thanks for any help!
David

On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 21:50:56 +0100, "Steve Lusardi"
wrote:

Condensation on the
inside is a whole different matter. There the best protection is urethane
foam above the water line and tar below.

Wish more people did that. I've seen steel hulls with everything below
the cabin sole foamed in, and it seems to essentially trap moisture
and makes a nice damp sponge...with predictable results.

Can you coal tar the entire interior hull and then foam waterline to
hull joint? In other words, will ureathane foam stick to tarred steel?
And is there any benefit to this?

R.

Yes, that is common practise. Keep in mind that epoxy paints work well if
not exposed to sunlight. Very poor UV protection.
Steve

"rhys" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 21:50:56 +0100, "Steve Lusardi"
wrote:

Condensation on the
inside is a whole different matter. There the best protection is urethane
foam above the water line and tar below.

Wish more people did that. I've seen steel hulls with everything below
the cabin sole foamed in, and it seems to essentially trap moisture
and makes a nice damp sponge...with predictable results.

Can you coal tar the entire interior hull and then foam waterline to
hull joint? In other words, will ureathane foam stick to tarred steel?
And is there any benefit to this?

R.

coal tar epoxy is unhealthy, 1970s type coating with all sorts of problems.
Use instead modern coal tar equivalents that don't use coal tar as an epoxy
additive


paul oman
progressive epoxy polymers





Steve Lusardi wrote:

Yes, that is common practise. Keep in mind that epoxy paints work well if
not exposed to sunlight. Very poor UV protection.
Steve

"rhys" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 21:50:56 +0100, "Steve Lusardi"
wrote:

Condensation on the
inside is a whole different matter. There the best protection is urethane
foam above the water line and tar below.

Wish more people did that. I've seen steel hulls with everything below
the cabin sole foamed in, and it seems to essentially trap moisture
and makes a nice damp sponge...with predictable results.

Can you coal tar the entire interior hull and then foam waterline to
hull joint? In other words, will ureathane foam stick to tarred steel?
And is there any benefit to this?

R.




--


"Living on Earth is expensive, but it does include
a free trip around the Sun every year."