John H wrote:
On 17 Feb 2005 10:01:15 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


John H wrote:
On 17 Feb 2005 08:49:22 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:

The Department of Homeland Security issued statements recently
that
if
terrorists hit the U.S. again, explosives will likely be
delivered
via
motor vehicle. First, is this supposed to be some kind of
revelation?
Hell, I could have told them THAT, for far less than the millions
it
probably cost for the dept. to come to that profound conclusion!
Secondly, what do I DO with that divine information? Do I report
every
motor vehicle I see to the Dept. of Homeland Security?
Next, U.S. intelligence reported recently that terrorists are
likely
to
manufacture and use a biological, chemical, or nuclear device
against
us. What are they trying to say? Sounds to me like they aren't
doing
there job! If they were, wouldn't they be saying that they are
STOPPING
terroists from doing just that?
Finally, what about this "terrorism"? I don't think we've been
truly
terrorized. Yes, some have, with 911 and all, but really, how
many
of
you are terrified to walk out of your door every day, go to work,
the
movies, fishing, etc. Are we really victims of terror? We are
victims
of zealots, fanatics, etc.

Is that little rant supposed to lend credibility to your posts?


John H

Yes. First, read it. It isn't a "rant". Simply the way I see things.
Secondly, what is NOT credible about it? Everything in it that I
presented as a fact, is true.
Now, when are you going to start the many, many posts calling JimH
and
Fritz a "****ing liar"?

Why would I do that?

John H

Because he IS one. You claimed Harry lied, and posted over and over and
over that he was "a ****ing liar". Don't you remember? Was you drunk?