![]() |
More Republican force-fed Ignorance, or "Martians"
"NOYB" wrote in message
k.net... I'm really curious if a large enough percentage of people would in fact pay a little more for an American made product if that differentiation were made evident. I would. However, historically, the answer has been "no". It's not just corporations' profits driving corporations overseas...the consumer's desire for the lowest priced good is driving 'em away. What do you suppose would happen if they knew that not all consumers are looking for the lowest priced items at all times? You already know what happens if the manufacturers DON'T have this information, right? Or, I suppose you could take the Dave Hall approach and do nothing, because your efforts might not work. |
More Republican force-fed Ignorance, or "Martians"
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "NOYB" wrote in message k.net... I'm really curious if a large enough percentage of people would in fact pay a little more for an American made product if that differentiation were made evident. I would. However, historically, the answer has been "no". It's not just corporations' profits driving corporations overseas...the consumer's desire for the lowest priced good is driving 'em away. What do you suppose would happen if they knew that not all consumers are looking for the lowest priced items at all times? You already know what happens if the manufacturers DON'T have this information, right? Or, I suppose you could take the Dave Hall approach and do nothing, because your efforts might not work. I used to be under the belief that corporation's tax breaks and write-offs ought to be set at a level that's indirectly proportional to the amount of their product that is manufactured overseas. The higher the percentage of goods made overseas, the lower the level of write-offs. For example, if 80% of their product is made overseas, then they lose 80% of their usual corporate write-offs. In order to make things "fair", the same rules would have to apply to foreign corporations selling goods over here...but it'd have to be done via a tariff...and that's the problem. Tariffs don't work. The Hawley-Smoot Tariff was a disaster that only served to prolong the great Depression. It seems that the Dave Hall approach of "doing nothing" might be the only answer. Sure, it's going to hurt in the short term...but I believe in the long term, things will even out. |
More Republican force-fed Ignorance, or "Martians"
You know I would not be adverse to buying foreign goods if they were
playing on a level trading field. You have all these companies selling their goods out of their home country for a great deal more then they sell to the customer overseas. Some good examples of these are Honda, Suzuki, Hyundai and Rolls Royce. And foreign traders are not the only guilty parties. See our own drug industry. You can go to Canada and buy the same, identical drug for up to 75% less then you pay here. All the goods produced by these firms are sold overseas for much less then the domestic price. The goods are dumped into the American consumer pool and snapped up at "discount" prices. What exactly is a "discount price"? Is the item worth less now then it was last week or across the street? No at all. A discount price is arbritary, as value is not absolute. I wonder how many of you realize the markup from raw material to retail? How much does it cost General Motors to make a $27,000.00 Chevy Impala? How much does it cost to make a $10,000.00 1 carat diamond ring? How much does it cost to make a $1.09 bottle of Coke? The answers will shock you! I will post them tomorrow after a short discussion. Capt. Frank NOYB wrote: "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "NOYB" wrote in message ink.net... I'm really curious if a large enough percentage of people would in fact pay a little more for an American made product if that differentiation were made evident. I would. However, historically, the answer has been "no". It's not just corporations' profits driving corporations overseas...the consumer's desire for the lowest priced good is driving 'em away. What do you suppose would happen if they knew that not all consumers are looking for the lowest priced items at all times? You already know what happens if the manufacturers DON'T have this information, right? Or, I suppose you could take the Dave Hall approach and do nothing, because your efforts might not work. I used to be under the belief that corporation's tax breaks and write-offs ought to be set at a level that's indirectly proportional to the amount of their product that is manufactured overseas. The higher the percentage of goods made overseas, the lower the level of write-offs. For example, if 80% of their product is made overseas, then they lose 80% of their usual corporate write-offs. In order to make things "fair", the same rules would have to apply to foreign corporations selling goods over here...but it'd have to be done via a tariff...and that's the problem. Tariffs don't work. The Hawley-Smoot Tariff was a disaster that only served to prolong the great Depression. It seems that the Dave Hall approach of "doing nothing" might be the only answer. Sure, it's going to hurt in the short term...but I believe in the long term, things will even out. |
More Republican force-fed Ignorance, or "Martians"
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:39:13 GMT, "Capt. Frank Hopkins"
wrote: On to Best Buys, I reached for an RCA (Radio Corporation of America) video camera, and lo and behold, it was made in Korea. So, I ended up going home with out buying anything. You see, my own way of protesting is not to buy foreign made products. You must not own very much......... Dave |
More Republican force-fed Ignorance, or "Martians"
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:26:50 -0800, jps wrote:
Yeah, let's do a total boycott of all foreign goods! Enjoy your walk...'cause you will not find an automobile made in the U.S. from parts made only in the U.S. While you're at it, you better sew your own shoes...'cause I doubt you'll find a pair made in the U.S. from materials made only in the U.S. You are an extremist. More selectivity along with a clear campaign led by consumer advocates might really help our current situation. I'm really curious if a large enough percentage of people would in fact pay a little more for an American made product if that differentiation were made evident. Assuming that the American made product was not made by a union worker who's under qualified for the job, and who's management can't fire him. And if that worker was not on the rag about their favorite sports team losing the night before, and adopting the "Hey, I'm not going to buy this thing" attitude and other equally "creative" ways to get out of putting in a full day's worth of QUALITY work for their overly inflated wages. And if the cost difference was marginal, then I might consider it. Dave |
More Republican force-fed Ignorance, or "Martians"
Dave Hall wrote in message . ..
On 14 Jan 2004 08:18:00 -0800, (basskisser) wrote: Mars Needs Dim Republicans Dubya dons a shiny spacesuit, dreams of spending billions to meet little green men. The nation cringes By Mark Morford, SF Gate Columnist Wednesday, January 14, 2004 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Oh right like this is exactly what we need. Gee, his partisan bias and lack of vision isn't too glaringly apparent is it? Another whining liberal....... Dave Do you think that, with the largest deficit we've EVER had, thanks to BushCo, that we need MORE debt? |
More Republican force-fed Ignorance, or "Martians"
"Capt. Frank Hopkins" wrote in message link.net...
Well Bass, Bush got elected by a "questionable" 347 votes in Florida. I don't think that will happen again. I do think that a Mars/Moon program would provide massive jobs IF the parts, software, and supplies and raw materials are "Made In USA" Absolutely! Very good points! |
More Republican force-fed Ignorance, or "Martians"
"Dave Hall" wrote in message
... On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:26:50 -0800, jps wrote: Yeah, let's do a total boycott of all foreign goods! Enjoy your walk...'cause you will not find an automobile made in the U.S. from parts made only in the U.S. While you're at it, you better sew your own shoes...'cause I doubt you'll find a pair made in the U.S. from materials made only in the U.S. You are an extremist. More selectivity along with a clear campaign led by consumer advocates might really help our current situation. I'm really curious if a large enough percentage of people would in fact pay a little more for an American made product if that differentiation were made evident. Assuming that the American made product was not made by a union worker who's under qualified for the job, and who's management can't fire him. And if that worker was not on the rag about their favorite sports team losing the night before, and adopting the "Hey, I'm not going to buy this thing" attitude and other equally "creative" ways to get out of putting in a full day's worth of QUALITY work for their overly inflated wages. And if the cost difference was marginal, then I might consider it. Dave My friend Bob must be a sick man. He's a union butcher. He works 10 hour days because he loves dealing with the public at the store I shop in. But, he's probably the only union employee in the known universe who's like that. Right, Dave? |
More Republican force-fed Ignorance, or "Martians"
"basskisser" wrote in message
m... "Capt. Frank Hopkins" wrote in message link.net... Well Bass, Bush got elected by a "questionable" 347 votes in Florida. I don't think that will happen again. I do think that a Mars/Moon program would provide massive jobs IF the parts, software, and supplies and raw materials are "Made In USA" Absolutely! Very good points! Well....except for the cameras, of course, since we haven't made a decent camera here since the early 1950s. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:46 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com