Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Michael Daly wrote: On 3-Mar-2005, "BCITORGB" wrote: Let's not talk about liberal vs conservative. Just to confuse the issue further, there is such a thing as a liberal conservative. The Economist states that its political position is such. Unfortunately, the use of the terminology in the present US political environment makes the term a contradiction and most Americans would have trouble with it. Mike In the last political cycle, there was talk here of being liberal on social issues, and conservative on economic issues. I am not sure if that is just a smoke screen for not knowing what you believe, and wanting to sound on the cutting edge of neuvo-politics! There would have to be an imbalance in the political power, or else the conservative part would not spring the money loose to pay the liberal programs, and the liberal programs would be opposed to the economic spending of the conservative. A real schizophrenic political animal! TnT |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tinkerntom" wrote in message ups.com... Michael Daly wrote: On 3-Mar-2005, "BCITORGB" wrote: Let's not talk about liberal vs conservative. Just to confuse the issue further, there is such a thing as a liberal conservative. The Economist states that its political position is such. Unfortunately, the use of the terminology in the present US political environment makes the term a contradiction and most Americans would have trouble with it. Mike In the last political cycle, there was talk here of being liberal on social issues, and conservative on economic issues. I am not sure if that is just a smoke screen for not knowing what you believe, and wanting to sound on the cutting edge of neuvo-politics! There would have to be an imbalance in the political power, or else the conservative part would not spring the money loose to pay the liberal programs, and the liberal programs would be opposed to the economic spending of the conservative. A real schizophrenic political animal! TnT Where I come from being a "liberal on social issues and a conservative on economic issues" means you are an all around good person. Too bad there are so few of them! The worst case is what the US has now...a bunch of socially conservative assholes who are at the same time blowing their economic wad faster than a soviet dictator in the middle of the Cold War! |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
KMAN correctly asserts:
========= The worst case is what the US has now...a bunch of socially conservative assholes who are at the same time blowing their economic wad faster than a soviet dictator in the middle of the Cold War! ======== So there you have it Tink: an example for social conservatism AND fiscal liberaleralism.... now you tell us who does more damage? frtzw906 |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() BCITORGB wrote: KMAN correctly asserts: ========= The worst case is what the US has now...a bunch of socially conservative assholes who are at the same time blowing their economic wad faster than a soviet dictator in the middle of the Cold War! ======== So there you have it Tink: an example for social conservatism AND fiscal liberaleralism.... now you tell us who does more damage? frtzw906 Not to be picky, and I think I know what you are saying, but what is "liberaleralism". If it is something we have not been discussing, I will have to take time to google and figure what it is! ![]() |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tink asks:
======== Not to be picky, and I think I know what you are saying, but what is "liberaleralism". =============== to be fiscally liberal is to be rather "free" with money.... a social liberal, like me, would advocate "freedom" in social interactions.... a social liberal would look at victimless interations and suggest that people ought to be free to engage in them.... Note "liberal" comes from the latin "liber" or FREE. frtzw906 |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() BCITORGB wrote: Tink asks: ======== Not to be picky, and I think I know what you are saying, but what is "liberaleralism". =============== to be fiscally liberal is to be rather "free" with money.... a social liberal, like me, would advocate "freedom" in social interactions.... a social liberal would look at victimless interations and suggest that people ought to be free to engage in them.... Note "liberal" comes from the latin "liber" or FREE. frtzw906 Eye was tryen to poind out yur spellin, wich eye thimk has two much "eral" in it! ![]() |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
whoops... missed it....
|
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
TnT says:
========== In the last political cycle, there was talk here of being liberal on social issues, and conservative on economic issues. I am not sure if that is just a smoke screen for not knowing what you believe, ========= It's actually quite simple Tink. I'll give you an example without even thinking about it too long. Social liberal: legalize MJ, legalize prositution, allow gay marriages, pro-choice... OK, so far that hasn't cost us a penny. Now for fiscal conservative: reduce military spending, eliminate subsidies to corporate interests, charge ranchers for grazing on federal lands, charge broadcasters more for using (abusing?) the people's radio bands.... OK, still not costing you any money... So, Tink, how was that hard to do? frtzw906 |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() BCITORGB wrote: TnT says: ========== In the last political cycle, there was talk here of being liberal on social issues, and conservative on economic issues. I am not sure if that is just a smoke screen for not knowing what you believe, ========= It's actually quite simple Tink. I'll give you an example without even thinking about it too long. Social liberal: legalize MJ, legalize prositution, allow gay marriages, pro-choice... OK, so far that hasn't cost us a penny. Now for fiscal conservative: reduce military spending, eliminate subsidies to corporate interests, charge ranchers for grazing on federal lands, charge broadcasters more for using (abusing?) the people's radio bands.... OK, still not costing you any money... So, Tink, how was that hard to do? frtzw906 frtwz, I would like to take a raincheck on this one, since there is already a lot going on here, but feel free to cash in the rain check later. TnT |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tink, you said:
============= frtwz, I would like to take a raincheck on this one, since there is already a lot going on here, but feel free to cash in the rain check later. TnT =========== Sure thing, Tink, but really this was not something that required comment. You thought that being a social liberal and a fiscal conservative would be difficult or impossible and I very simply gave you an example of how that could readily be the case -- like me. frtzw906 |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Crimes Against Nature-- RFK, Jr. Interview | General |