"KMAN" wrote in message
...
in article
et, rick at
wrote on 3/2/05 10:19 PM:


"KMAN" wrote in message
...
in article
et, rick at
wrote on 3/2/05 6:01 PM:


"KMAN" wrote in message
...

"rick" wrote in message
ink.net...

"BCITORGB" wrote in message
ps.com...
KMAN, I was pleased with the effort Tink took to get a
handle
on this
situation. And, from my own perspective, I've done some
reading about
various systems and have at least a passing acquaintance
with
a variety
of European models (I now know the difference between the
Beveridge and
the Bismark approaches to healthcare funding). In that
sense,
all of
this has been useful for me.

It's too bad rick could never see the value in such
discourse.
====================
LOL I tried, fool. All I got was a bunch of jingoistic
chest-thumping lies.

Perhaps you should stop telling them, then.
=====================
I didn't lie, liarman. People are on long waiting lists in
Canada, and some of those people die while waiting for that
treatment. Sites have been presented to you that prove
this,
yet
you insist on your chest-thumping lies. Why is that
liarman?
Haven't quite gotten your refutaions together yet?

I'm not lying about anything.
=====================
Yes, you are, liarman. People are on long waiting lists in
Canada, and some of those people die while waiting for that
treatment. Sites have been presented to you that prove this,
yet
you insist on your chest-thumping lies. Why is that liarman?
Haven't quite gotten your refutaions together yet?

I don't think you've been paying attention and you are making a
fool of
yourself. You might want to ask Tinkerntom to point you to the
post (long
ago) where I conceded that the way I framed the question
allowed you to meet
the burden of proof I requested.
==============================
Yet the proof was presented, and it proves you are a liar
regardless of how you make your claim.



The way you have gone on and on about it has further cemented
your
reputation as a petty juvenile, and your refusal to apologize
for your
extreme dishonesty in saying I claimed that no one in Canada is
waiting for
treatment has added coward and scumbag to your character
traits.
====================
LOL No, I have proven you to be the liar that your are. Also
that you are willfully ignorant and plan to remain so.
This all started because YOU claimed no one in Canada was dying
because they are waiting for treatment. You lied then, and you
continue to lie. You can't seem to help yourslef, can you,
liarman? You now are trying to divert the discussion onto a lie
that you have now taken back, that no one is waiting for
treatment. Why can't you saty on focus of the original
discussion, liarman? Oh, yeah, because you've been proven to
have lied about that too!

"rick" wrote in message
link.net...

"KMAN" wrote in message
...
in article et, rick at
wrote on 3/2/05 10:19 PM:


"KMAN" wrote in message
...
in article
et, rick at
wrote on 3/2/05 6:01 PM:


"KMAN" wrote in message
...

"rick" wrote in message
ink.net...

"BCITORGB" wrote in message
ps.com...
KMAN, I was pleased with the effort Tink took to get a
handle
on this
situation. And, from my own perspective, I've done some
reading about
various systems and have at least a passing acquaintance
with
a variety
of European models (I now know the difference between the
Beveridge and
the Bismark approaches to healthcare funding). In that
sense,
all of
this has been useful for me.

It's too bad rick could never see the value in such
discourse.
====================
LOL I tried, fool. All I got was a bunch of jingoistic
chest-thumping lies.

Perhaps you should stop telling them, then.
=====================
I didn't lie, liarman. People are on long waiting lists in
Canada, and some of those people die while waiting for that
treatment. Sites have been presented to you that prove this,
yet
you insist on your chest-thumping lies. Why is that liarman?
Haven't quite gotten your refutaions together yet?

I'm not lying about anything.
=====================
Yes, you are, liarman. People are on long waiting lists in
Canada, and some of those people die while waiting for that
treatment. Sites have been presented to you that prove this, yet
you insist on your chest-thumping lies. Why is that liarman?
Haven't quite gotten your refutaions together yet?

I don't think you've been paying attention and you are making a fool of
yourself. You might want to ask Tinkerntom to point you to the post (long
ago) where I conceded that the way I framed the question allowed you to
meet
the burden of proof I requested.
==============================
Yet the proof was presented, and it proves you are a liar regardless of
how you make your claim.

All it proves is that I told you the people in Newfoundland were not waiting
2 1/2 years for treatment and I was right.

You are a scumbag, and a coward for not admitting your dishonesty.

"KMAN" wrote in message
...

"rick" wrote in message
link.net...

"KMAN" wrote in message
...
in article
et, rick at
wrote on 3/2/05 10:19 PM:


"KMAN" wrote in message
...
in article
et, rick
at
wrote on 3/2/05 6:01 PM:


"KMAN" wrote in message
...

"rick" wrote in message
ink.net...

"BCITORGB" wrote in message
ps.com...
KMAN, I was pleased with the effort Tink took to get a
handle
on this
situation. And, from my own perspective, I've done some
reading about
various systems and have at least a passing
acquaintance
with
a variety
of European models (I now know the difference between
the
Beveridge and
the Bismark approaches to healthcare funding). In that
sense,
all of
this has been useful for me.

It's too bad rick could never see the value in such
discourse.
====================
LOL I tried, fool. All I got was a bunch of jingoistic
chest-thumping lies.

Perhaps you should stop telling them, then.
=====================
I didn't lie, liarman. People are on long waiting lists
in
Canada, and some of those people die while waiting for
that
treatment. Sites have been presented to you that prove
this,
yet
you insist on your chest-thumping lies. Why is that
liarman?
Haven't quite gotten your refutaions together yet?

I'm not lying about anything.
=====================
Yes, you are, liarman. People are on long waiting lists in
Canada, and some of those people die while waiting for that
treatment. Sites have been presented to you that prove
this, yet
you insist on your chest-thumping lies. Why is that
liarman?
Haven't quite gotten your refutaions together yet?

I don't think you've been paying attention and you are making
a fool of
yourself. You might want to ask Tinkerntom to point you to
the post (long
ago) where I conceded that the way I framed the question
allowed you to meet
the burden of proof I requested.
==============================
Yet the proof was presented, and it proves you are a liar
regardless of how you make your claim.

All it proves is that I told you the people in Newfoundland
were not waiting 2 1/2 years for treatment and I was right.

You are a scumbag, and a coward for not admitting your
dishonesty.
==========================
That was but one example to show that you were lying, and still
are, liarman. You did make that claim fool, because the post you
were repliying to was all about waiting for health care in
Canada. You have now decided to tap dance by claiming it was
about only one site, and one example.

in article , rick at
wrote on 3/3/05 4:30 PM:


"KMAN" wrote in message
...

"rick" wrote in message
link.net...

"KMAN" wrote in message
...
in article
et, rick at
wrote on 3/2/05 10:19 PM:


"KMAN" wrote in message
...
in article
et, rick
at
wrote on 3/2/05 6:01 PM:


"KMAN" wrote in message
...

"rick" wrote in message
ink.net...

"BCITORGB" wrote in message
ps.com...
KMAN, I was pleased with the effort Tink took to get a
handle
on this
situation. And, from my own perspective, I've done some
reading about
various systems and have at least a passing
acquaintance
with
a variety
of European models (I now know the difference between
the
Beveridge and
the Bismark approaches to healthcare funding). In that
sense,
all of
this has been useful for me.

It's too bad rick could never see the value in such
discourse.
====================
LOL I tried, fool. All I got was a bunch of jingoistic
chest-thumping lies.

Perhaps you should stop telling them, then.
=====================
I didn't lie, liarman. People are on long waiting lists
in
Canada, and some of those people die while waiting for
that
treatment. Sites have been presented to you that prove
this,
yet
you insist on your chest-thumping lies. Why is that
liarman?
Haven't quite gotten your refutaions together yet?

I'm not lying about anything.
=====================
Yes, you are, liarman. People are on long waiting lists in
Canada, and some of those people die while waiting for that
treatment. Sites have been presented to you that prove
this, yet
you insist on your chest-thumping lies. Why is that
liarman?
Haven't quite gotten your refutaions together yet?

I don't think you've been paying attention and you are making
a fool of
yourself. You might want to ask Tinkerntom to point you to
the post (long
ago) where I conceded that the way I framed the question
allowed you to meet
the burden of proof I requested.
==============================
Yet the proof was presented, and it proves you are a liar
regardless of how you make your claim.

All it proves is that I told you the people in Newfoundland
were not waiting 2 1/2 years for treatment and I was right.

You are a scumbag, and a coward for not admitting your
dishonesty.
==========================
That was but one example to show that you were lying

Whatever you think it was, I never said that no one in Canada is waiting for
treatment.

You are being extremely dishonest. You owe me an apology, but you are too
big of a coward to admit that you are wrong. You are a scumbag.

"KMAN" wrote in message
...
in article ,
rick at
wrote on 3/3/05 4:30 PM:


"KMAN" wrote in message
...

"rick" wrote in message
link.net...

"KMAN" wrote in message
...
in article
et, rick
at
wrote on 3/2/05 10:19 PM:


"KMAN" wrote in message
...
in article
et,
rick
at
wrote on 3/2/05 6:01 PM:


"KMAN" wrote in message
...

"rick" wrote in message
ink.net...

"BCITORGB" wrote in message
ps.com...
KMAN, I was pleased with the effort Tink took to get
a
handle
on this
situation. And, from my own perspective, I've done
some
reading about
various systems and have at least a passing
acquaintance
with
a variety
of European models (I now know the difference between
the
Beveridge and
the Bismark approaches to healthcare funding). In
that
sense,
all of
this has been useful for me.

It's too bad rick could never see the value in such
discourse.
====================
LOL I tried, fool. All I got was a bunch of
jingoistic
chest-thumping lies.

Perhaps you should stop telling them, then.
=====================
I didn't lie, liarman. People are on long waiting lists
in
Canada, and some of those people die while waiting for
that
treatment. Sites have been presented to you that prove
this,
yet
you insist on your chest-thumping lies. Why is that
liarman?
Haven't quite gotten your refutaions together yet?

I'm not lying about anything.
=====================
Yes, you are, liarman. People are on long waiting lists
in
Canada, and some of those people die while waiting for
that
treatment. Sites have been presented to you that prove
this, yet
you insist on your chest-thumping lies. Why is that
liarman?
Haven't quite gotten your refutaions together yet?

I don't think you've been paying attention and you are
making
a fool of
yourself. You might want to ask Tinkerntom to point you to
the post (long
ago) where I conceded that the way I framed the question
allowed you to meet
the burden of proof I requested.
==============================
Yet the proof was presented, and it proves you are a liar
regardless of how you make your claim.

All it proves is that I told you the people in Newfoundland
were not waiting 2 1/2 years for treatment and I was right.

You are a scumbag, and a coward for not admitting your
dishonesty.
==========================
That was but one example to show that you were lying

Whatever you think it was, I never said that no one in Canada
is waiting for
treatment.
=================
Yes, you did. And you are still lying because you are using
this as an excuse for staying away from the original topic,
people dying in wait lines in the canadaian health system. Too
bad that this diversion is all you have to discuss, eh liarman?


You are being extremely dishonest. You owe me an apology, but
you are too
big of a coward to admit that you are wrong. You are a scumbag.
======================
No, fool, you keep describing yourself, why is that? You are the
one that has never honestly discussed the issue at hand. Why is
that, liarman? Already know that you are continuing to lie?

"rick" wrote in message
k.net...

"KMAN" wrote in message
...
in article , rick at
wrote on 3/3/05 4:30 PM:


"KMAN" wrote in message
...

"rick" wrote in message
link.net...

"KMAN" wrote in message
...
in article
et, rick at
wrote on 3/2/05 10:19 PM:


"KMAN" wrote in message
...
in article
et, rick
at
wrote on 3/2/05 6:01 PM:


"KMAN" wrote in message
...

"rick" wrote in message
ink.net...

"BCITORGB" wrote in message
ps.com...
KMAN, I was pleased with the effort Tink took to get a
handle
on this
situation. And, from my own perspective, I've done some
reading about
various systems and have at least a passing
acquaintance
with
a variety
of European models (I now know the difference between
the
Beveridge and
the Bismark approaches to healthcare funding). In that
sense,
all of
this has been useful for me.

It's too bad rick could never see the value in such
discourse.
====================
LOL I tried, fool. All I got was a bunch of jingoistic
chest-thumping lies.

Perhaps you should stop telling them, then.
=====================
I didn't lie, liarman. People are on long waiting lists
in
Canada, and some of those people die while waiting for
that
treatment. Sites have been presented to you that prove
this,
yet
you insist on your chest-thumping lies. Why is that
liarman?
Haven't quite gotten your refutaions together yet?

I'm not lying about anything.
=====================
Yes, you are, liarman. People are on long waiting lists in
Canada, and some of those people die while waiting for that
treatment. Sites have been presented to you that prove
this, yet
you insist on your chest-thumping lies. Why is that
liarman?
Haven't quite gotten your refutaions together yet?

I don't think you've been paying attention and you are making
a fool of
yourself. You might want to ask Tinkerntom to point you to
the post (long
ago) where I conceded that the way I framed the question
allowed you to meet
the burden of proof I requested.
==============================
Yet the proof was presented, and it proves you are a liar
regardless of how you make your claim.

All it proves is that I told you the people in Newfoundland
were not waiting 2 1/2 years for treatment and I was right.

You are a scumbag, and a coward for not admitting your
dishonesty.
==========================
That was but one example to show that you were lying

Whatever you think it was, I never said that no one in Canada is waiting
for
treatment.
=================
Yes, you did.

No, I didn't. The only evidence that you presented was my response to your
story about Newfoundland, in which you claimed people were waiting 2 1/2
years for treatment. Within the same article, it is pointed out that they
are all in fact in receipt of treatment, and are waiting for a specific
test, a test that they will receive more quickly if necessary. This is not
proof that I said no one in Canada waits for treatment. I never said that,
and it's silly to suggest that I did. Everyone in every health care system
has to wait.

Stop being such a scumbag and apologize. Or are you too big of a coward?

"KMAN" wrote in message
...

"rick" wrote in message


snip

I don't think you've been paying attention and you are
making
a fool of
yourself. You might want to ask Tinkerntom to point you
to
the post (long
ago) where I conceded that the way I framed the question
allowed you to meet
the burden of proof I requested.
==============================
Yet the proof was presented, and it proves you are a liar
regardless of how you make your claim.

All it proves is that I told you the people in Newfoundland
were not waiting 2 1/2 years for treatment and I was right.

You are a scumbag, and a coward for not admitting your
dishonesty.
==========================
That was but one example to show that you were lying

Whatever you think it was, I never said that no one in Canada
is waiting for
treatment.
=================
Yes, you did.

No, I didn't. The only evidence that you presented was my
response to your story about Newfoundland, in which you claimed
people were waiting 2 1/2 years for treatment.
==========================
LOL No, fool "I" didn't claim that, I posted the site, a
Canadian site, that states that, and backs it up. Too bad you
can't seem to keep things straight here, eh liarman?


Within the same article, it is pointed out that they
are all in fact in receipt of treatment, and are waiting for a
specific test, a test that they will receive more quickly if
necessary.
==========================
Nope. Their treatment depended on getting the scans fool.



This is not
proof that I said no one in Canada waits for treatment. I never
said that, and it's silly to suggest that I did. Everyone in
every health care system has to wait.
==========================
Thanks for admitting that you originally lied, liarman.


Stop being such a scumbag and apologize. Or are you too big of
a coward?
===============
Nope. you must be though. Where's yours, liarman?

"KMAN" wrote in message
...

"rick" wrote in message


snip



You are a scumbag, and a coward for not admitting your
dishonesty.
==========================
That was but one example to show that you were lying

Whatever you think it was, I never said that no one in Canada
is waiting for
treatment.
=================
Yes, you did.

No, I didn't.
==============
Yes, you did, and 've explained it to you.

The only evidence that you presented was my response to your
story about Newfoundland, in which you claimed people were
waiting 2 1/2 years for treatment. Within the same article, it
is pointed out that they are all in fact in receipt of
treatment,
=================
Another lie, liarman. It does not. The original doctor wants
the scans so he can determine what treatment is necessary. Why
do you continur to lie so much? Genetic?


and are waiting for a specific
test, a test that they will receive more quickly if necessary.
This is not proof that I said no one in Canada waits for
treatment. I never said that, and it's silly to suggest that I
did. Everyone in every health care system has to wait.

Stop being such a scumbag and apologize. Or are you too big of
a coward?
====================
No, not at all, you must be though. Where's your apology,
liarman?