Thread
:
Bill Moyers on environment, politics and Christian fundamentalists
View Single Post
#
5
rick
Posts: n/a
"KMAN" wrote in message
...
in article ,
rick at
wrote on 3/3/05 4:30 PM:
"KMAN" wrote in message
...
"rick" wrote in message
link.net...
"KMAN" wrote in message
...
in article
et, rick
at
wrote on 3/2/05 10:19 PM:
"KMAN" wrote in message
...
in article
et,
rick
at
wrote on 3/2/05 6:01 PM:
"KMAN" wrote in message
...
"rick" wrote in message
ink.net...
"BCITORGB" wrote in message
ps.com...
KMAN, I was pleased with the effort Tink took to get
a
handle
on this
situation. And, from my own perspective, I've done
some
reading about
various systems and have at least a passing
acquaintance
with
a variety
of European models (I now know the difference between
the
Beveridge and
the Bismark approaches to healthcare funding). In
that
sense,
all of
this has been useful for me.
It's too bad rick could never see the value in such
discourse.
====================
LOL I tried, fool. All I got was a bunch of
jingoistic
chest-thumping lies.
Perhaps you should stop telling them, then.
=====================
I didn't lie, liarman. People are on long waiting lists
in
Canada, and some of those people die while waiting for
that
treatment. Sites have been presented to you that prove
this,
yet
you insist on your chest-thumping lies. Why is that
liarman?
Haven't quite gotten your refutaions together yet?
I'm not lying about anything.
=====================
Yes, you are, liarman. People are on long waiting lists
in
Canada, and some of those people die while waiting for
that
treatment. Sites have been presented to you that prove
this, yet
you insist on your chest-thumping lies. Why is that
liarman?
Haven't quite gotten your refutaions together yet?
I don't think you've been paying attention and you are
making
a fool of
yourself. You might want to ask Tinkerntom to point you to
the post (long
ago) where I conceded that the way I framed the question
allowed you to meet
the burden of proof I requested.
==============================
Yet the proof was presented, and it proves you are a liar
regardless of how you make your claim.
All it proves is that I told you the people in Newfoundland
were not waiting 2 1/2 years for treatment and I was right.
You are a scumbag, and a coward for not admitting your
dishonesty.
==========================
That was but one example to show that you were lying
Whatever you think it was, I never said that no one in Canada
is waiting for
treatment.
=================
Yes, you did. And you are still lying because you are using
this as an excuse for staying away from the original topic,
people dying in wait lines in the canadaian health system. Too
bad that this diversion is all you have to discuss, eh liarman?
You are being extremely dishonest. You owe me an apology, but
you are too
big of a coward to admit that you are wrong. You are a scumbag.
======================
No, fool, you keep describing yourself, why is that? You are the
one that has never honestly discussed the issue at hand. Why is
that, liarman? Already know that you are continuing to lie?
Reply With Quote