Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "rick" wrote in message k.net... "KMAN" wrote in message ... in article , rick at wrote on 3/3/05 4:30 PM: "KMAN" wrote in message ... "rick" wrote in message link.net... "KMAN" wrote in message ... in article et, rick at wrote on 3/2/05 10:19 PM: "KMAN" wrote in message ... in article et, rick at wrote on 3/2/05 6:01 PM: "KMAN" wrote in message ... "rick" wrote in message ink.net... "BCITORGB" wrote in message ps.com... KMAN, I was pleased with the effort Tink took to get a handle on this situation. And, from my own perspective, I've done some reading about various systems and have at least a passing acquaintance with a variety of European models (I now know the difference between the Beveridge and the Bismark approaches to healthcare funding). In that sense, all of this has been useful for me. It's too bad rick could never see the value in such discourse. ==================== LOL I tried, fool. All I got was a bunch of jingoistic chest-thumping lies. Perhaps you should stop telling them, then. ===================== I didn't lie, liarman. People are on long waiting lists in Canada, and some of those people die while waiting for that treatment. Sites have been presented to you that prove this, yet you insist on your chest-thumping lies. Why is that liarman? Haven't quite gotten your refutaions together yet? I'm not lying about anything. ===================== Yes, you are, liarman. People are on long waiting lists in Canada, and some of those people die while waiting for that treatment. Sites have been presented to you that prove this, yet you insist on your chest-thumping lies. Why is that liarman? Haven't quite gotten your refutaions together yet? I don't think you've been paying attention and you are making a fool of yourself. You might want to ask Tinkerntom to point you to the post (long ago) where I conceded that the way I framed the question allowed you to meet the burden of proof I requested. ============================== Yet the proof was presented, and it proves you are a liar regardless of how you make your claim. All it proves is that I told you the people in Newfoundland were not waiting 2 1/2 years for treatment and I was right. You are a scumbag, and a coward for not admitting your dishonesty. ========================== That was but one example to show that you were lying Whatever you think it was, I never said that no one in Canada is waiting for treatment. ================= Yes, you did. No, I didn't. The only evidence that you presented was my response to your story about Newfoundland, in which you claimed people were waiting 2 1/2 years for treatment. Within the same article, it is pointed out that they are all in fact in receipt of treatment, and are waiting for a specific test, a test that they will receive more quickly if necessary. This is not proof that I said no one in Canada waits for treatment. I never said that, and it's silly to suggest that I did. Everyone in every health care system has to wait. Stop being such a scumbag and apologize. Or are you too big of a coward? |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "KMAN" wrote in message ... "rick" wrote in message snip I don't think you've been paying attention and you are making a fool of yourself. You might want to ask Tinkerntom to point you to the post (long ago) where I conceded that the way I framed the question allowed you to meet the burden of proof I requested. ============================== Yet the proof was presented, and it proves you are a liar regardless of how you make your claim. All it proves is that I told you the people in Newfoundland were not waiting 2 1/2 years for treatment and I was right. You are a scumbag, and a coward for not admitting your dishonesty. ========================== That was but one example to show that you were lying Whatever you think it was, I never said that no one in Canada is waiting for treatment. ================= Yes, you did. No, I didn't. The only evidence that you presented was my response to your story about Newfoundland, in which you claimed people were waiting 2 1/2 years for treatment. ========================== LOL No, fool "I" didn't claim that, I posted the site, a Canadian site, that states that, and backs it up. Too bad you can't seem to keep things straight here, eh liarman? Within the same article, it is pointed out that they are all in fact in receipt of treatment, and are waiting for a specific test, a test that they will receive more quickly if necessary. ========================== Nope. Their treatment depended on getting the scans fool. This is not proof that I said no one in Canada waits for treatment. I never said that, and it's silly to suggest that I did. Everyone in every health care system has to wait. ========================== Thanks for admitting that you originally lied, liarman. Stop being such a scumbag and apologize. Or are you too big of a coward? =============== Nope. you must be though. Where's yours, liarman? |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "rick" wrote in message nk.net... "KMAN" wrote in message ... "rick" wrote in message snip I don't think you've been paying attention and you are making a fool of yourself. You might want to ask Tinkerntom to point you to the post (long ago) where I conceded that the way I framed the question allowed you to meet the burden of proof I requested. ============================== Yet the proof was presented, and it proves you are a liar regardless of how you make your claim. All it proves is that I told you the people in Newfoundland were not waiting 2 1/2 years for treatment and I was right. You are a scumbag, and a coward for not admitting your dishonesty. ========================== That was but one example to show that you were lying Whatever you think it was, I never said that no one in Canada is waiting for treatment. ================= Yes, you did. No, I didn't. The only evidence that you presented was my response to your story about Newfoundland, in which you claimed people were waiting 2 1/2 years for treatment. ========================== LOL No, fool "I" didn't claim that, I posted the site, a Canadian site, that states that, and backs it up. Too bad you can't seem to keep things straight here, eh liarman? It doesn't matter. Even if we differ on what the article itself says (since the doctor in the article mentions specifically that all the patients are under care, I don't know why you perseverate on it) the point is I was only responding your claim about that one article - I wasn't talking about all of Canada or all Canadians. I never said no one in Canada ever has to wait for treatment - which is what you claimed I said. You owe me an apology, but you are too big of a coward and scumbag to do it. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "KMAN" wrote in message ... "rick" wrote in message nk.net... "KMAN" wrote in message ... "rick" wrote in message snip I don't think you've been paying attention and you are making a fool of yourself. You might want to ask Tinkerntom to point you to the post (long ago) where I conceded that the way I framed the question allowed you to meet the burden of proof I requested. ============================== Yet the proof was presented, and it proves you are a liar regardless of how you make your claim. All it proves is that I told you the people in Newfoundland were not waiting 2 1/2 years for treatment and I was right. You are a scumbag, and a coward for not admitting your dishonesty. ========================== That was but one example to show that you were lying Whatever you think it was, I never said that no one in Canada is waiting for treatment. ================= Yes, you did. No, I didn't. The only evidence that you presented was my response to your story about Newfoundland, in which you claimed people were waiting 2 1/2 years for treatment. ========================== LOL No, fool "I" didn't claim that, I posted the site, a Canadian site, that states that, and backs it up. Too bad you can't seem to keep things straight here, eh liarman? It doesn't matter. Even if we differ on what the article itself says (since the doctor in the article mentions specifically that all the patients are under care, I don't know why you perseverate on it) the point is I was only responding your claim about that one article - I wasn't talking about all of Canada or all Canadians. I never said no one in Canada ever has to wait for treatment - which is what you claimed I said. ================ Yes, you did. But it's nice to see you have admitted your lie. You owe me an apology, but you are too big of a coward and scumbag to do it. ================== No, I don't. And, I'm not the one that claimed they would, liarman. Where's yours? |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "rick" wrote in message nk.net... "KMAN" wrote in message ... "rick" wrote in message nk.net... "KMAN" wrote in message ... "rick" wrote in message snip I don't think you've been paying attention and you are making a fool of yourself. You might want to ask Tinkerntom to point you to the post (long ago) where I conceded that the way I framed the question allowed you to meet the burden of proof I requested. ============================== Yet the proof was presented, and it proves you are a liar regardless of how you make your claim. All it proves is that I told you the people in Newfoundland were not waiting 2 1/2 years for treatment and I was right. You are a scumbag, and a coward for not admitting your dishonesty. ========================== That was but one example to show that you were lying Whatever you think it was, I never said that no one in Canada is waiting for treatment. ================= Yes, you did. No, I didn't. The only evidence that you presented was my response to your story about Newfoundland, in which you claimed people were waiting 2 1/2 years for treatment. ========================== LOL No, fool "I" didn't claim that, I posted the site, a Canadian site, that states that, and backs it up. Too bad you can't seem to keep things straight here, eh liarman? It doesn't matter. Even if we differ on what the article itself says (since the doctor in the article mentions specifically that all the patients are under care, I don't know why you perseverate on it) the point is I was only responding your claim about that one article - I wasn't talking about all of Canada or all Canadians. I never said no one in Canada ever has to wait for treatment - which is what you claimed I said. ================ Yes, you did. I refuted your claim that the people in Newfoundland were not waiting 2.5 years for treatment. Whether or not you choose to accept that refutation, that in no way substantiates your false claim that I said no one in Canada ever waits for treatment. You are a dishonest scumbag and you owe me an apology. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "KMAN" wrote in message ... "rick" wrote in message nk.net... "KMAN" wrote in message ... "rick" wrote in message nk.net... "KMAN" wrote in message ... "rick" wrote in message snip I don't think you've been paying attention and you are making a fool of yourself. You might want to ask Tinkerntom to point you to the post (long ago) where I conceded that the way I framed the question allowed you to meet the burden of proof I requested. ============================== Yet the proof was presented, and it proves you are a liar regardless of how you make your claim. All it proves is that I told you the people in Newfoundland were not waiting 2 1/2 years for treatment and I was right. You are a scumbag, and a coward for not admitting your dishonesty. ========================== That was but one example to show that you were lying Whatever you think it was, I never said that no one in Canada is waiting for treatment. ================= Yes, you did. No, I didn't. The only evidence that you presented was my response to your story about Newfoundland, in which you claimed people were waiting 2 1/2 years for treatment. ========================== LOL No, fool "I" didn't claim that, I posted the site, a Canadian site, that states that, and backs it up. Too bad you can't seem to keep things straight here, eh liarman? It doesn't matter. Even if we differ on what the article itself says (since the doctor in the article mentions specifically that all the patients are under care, I don't know why you perseverate on it) the point is I was only responding your claim about that one article - I wasn't talking about all of Canada or all Canadians. I never said no one in Canada ever has to wait for treatment - which is what you claimed I said. ================ Yes, you did. I refuted your claim that the people in Newfoundland were not waiting 2.5 years for treatment. ======================== No, you did not, liarman. Whether or not you choose to accept that refutation, ================ You have to make it first, liarman... that in no way substantiates your false claim that I said no one in Canada ever waits for treatment. You are a dishonest scumbag and you owe me an apology. ================== No, I don't. And, I'm not the one that claimed they would, liarman. Where's yours? |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "KMAN" wrote in message ... "rick" wrote in message snip You are a scumbag, and a coward for not admitting your dishonesty. ========================== That was but one example to show that you were lying Whatever you think it was, I never said that no one in Canada is waiting for treatment. ================= Yes, you did. No, I didn't. ============== Yes, you did, and 've explained it to you. The only evidence that you presented was my response to your story about Newfoundland, in which you claimed people were waiting 2 1/2 years for treatment. Within the same article, it is pointed out that they are all in fact in receipt of treatment, ================= Another lie, liarman. It does not. The original doctor wants the scans so he can determine what treatment is necessary. Why do you continur to lie so much? Genetic? and are waiting for a specific test, a test that they will receive more quickly if necessary. This is not proof that I said no one in Canada waits for treatment. I never said that, and it's silly to suggest that I did. Everyone in every health care system has to wait. Stop being such a scumbag and apologize. Or are you too big of a coward? ==================== No, not at all, you must be though. Where's your apology, liarman? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Crimes Against Nature-- RFK, Jr. Interview | General |