| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"rick" wrote in message k.net... "KMAN" wrote in message ... in article , rick at wrote on 2/28/05 6:52 PM: "KMAN" wrote in message . .. "rick" wrote in message .net... "KMAN" wrote in message . .. snip... If you are using cars as a justification for assault weapons, then you are comparing the two, fool. LOL. ========================== No fool. It is you that is trying to justify something based on what YOU determine to be a need. You failed. You brought up cars, not me. ====================== No, you brought up the "need" of an object being the determination whether or not people should have them. You lost, again, and now have you resort to your ignorant spews... You brought up cars. Check. =============== LOL STill as dense and stupid as ever I see, eh liar? Nope. You brought up cars. Check. ====================== No So you didn't bring up cars? ======================== Nice bit of dishonesty there fool. So you didn't bring up cars? ======================= You didn't bring up need as the basis for owning anything, liar? Here, let me restore your dishonesty again, liar.. "No, you brought up the "need" of an object being the determination whether or not people should have them. You lost, again, and now have you resort to your ignorant spews... checkmate, proven liar..." What is the need for assault weapons to the general public? It's a valid question. They are only useful for spraying bullets. Why else do you need them? In response to this YOU brought up the fact that people get killed by cars. But cars have many other valid and valuable purposes. But you don't want to address that, even though YOU brought it up. Scum. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"KMAN" wrote in message . .. "rick" wrote in message k.net... "KMAN" wrote in message ... in article , rick at wrote on 2/28/05 6:52 PM: "KMAN" wrote in message . .. "rick" wrote in message .net... "KMAN" wrote in message . .. snip... If you are using cars as a justification for assault weapons, then you are comparing the two, fool. LOL. ========================== No fool. It is you that is trying to justify something based on what YOU determine to be a need. You failed. You brought up cars, not me. ====================== No, you brought up the "need" of an object being the determination whether or not people should have them. You lost, again, and now have you resort to your ignorant spews... You brought up cars. Check. =============== LOL STill as dense and stupid as ever I see, eh liar? Nope. You brought up cars. Check. ====================== No So you didn't bring up cars? ======================== Nice bit of dishonesty there fool. So you didn't bring up cars? ======================= You didn't bring up need as the basis for owning anything, liar? Here, let me restore your dishonesty again, liar.. "No, you brought up the "need" of an object being the determination whether or not people should have them. You lost, again, and now have you resort to your ignorant spews... checkmate, proven liar..." What is the need for assault weapons to the general public? It's a valid question. They are only useful for spraying bullets. Why else do you need them? In response to this YOU brought up the fact that people get killed by cars. But cars have many other valid and valuable purposes. ================ So do weapons. But you don't want to address that, even though YOU brought it up. Scum. ================= No, you brought it up fool. As usual, you can do nothing but lie. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
in article et, rick at
wrote on 3/1/05 5:20 PM: "KMAN" wrote in message . .. "rick" wrote in message k.net... "KMAN" wrote in message ... in article , rick at wrote on 2/28/05 6:52 PM: "KMAN" wrote in message . .. "rick" wrote in message .net... "KMAN" wrote in message . .. snip... If you are using cars as a justification for assault weapons, then you are comparing the two, fool. LOL. ========================== No fool. It is you that is trying to justify something based on what YOU determine to be a need. You failed. You brought up cars, not me. ====================== No, you brought up the "need" of an object being the determination whether or not people should have them. You lost, again, and now have you resort to your ignorant spews... You brought up cars. Check. =============== LOL STill as dense and stupid as ever I see, eh liar? Nope. You brought up cars. Check. ====================== No So you didn't bring up cars? ======================== Nice bit of dishonesty there fool. So you didn't bring up cars? ======================= You didn't bring up need as the basis for owning anything, liar? Here, let me restore your dishonesty again, liar.. "No, you brought up the "need" of an object being the determination whether or not people should have them. You lost, again, and now have you resort to your ignorant spews... checkmate, proven liar..." What is the need for assault weapons to the general public? It's a valid question. They are only useful for spraying bullets. Why else do you need them? In response to this YOU brought up the fact that people get killed by cars. But cars have many other valid and valuable purposes. ================ So do weapons. What are the valuable purposes of assault weapons that are comparable to the valuable purposes of cars? |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
"KMAN" wrote in message ... in article et, rick at wrote on 3/1/05 5:20 PM: snip... Here, let me restore your dishonesty again, liar.. "No, you brought up the "need" of an object being the determination whether or not people should have them. You lost, again, and now have you resort to your ignorant spews... checkmate, proven liar..." What is the need for assault weapons to the general public? It's a valid question. They are only useful for spraying bullets. Why else do you need them? In response to this YOU brought up the fact that people get killed by cars. But cars have many other valid and valuable purposes. ================ So do weapons. What are the valuable purposes of assault weapons that are comparable to the valuable purposes of cars? ======================== LOL Tap, tap, tap. First it's does it have a need? As if 'need' is the determenat as to whether an object can be owned. Now it's a 'valuable' need! You really don't have a clue, do you, liarman. When you going to read the facts about the claims you have made about health care, liar? |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
in article t, rick at
wrote on 3/1/05 11:01 PM: "KMAN" wrote in message ... in article et, rick at wrote on 3/1/05 5:20 PM: snip... Here, let me restore your dishonesty again, liar.. "No, you brought up the "need" of an object being the determination whether or not people should have them. You lost, again, and now have you resort to your ignorant spews... checkmate, proven liar..." What is the need for assault weapons to the general public? It's a valid question. They are only useful for spraying bullets. Why else do you need them? In response to this YOU brought up the fact that people get killed by cars. But cars have many other valid and valuable purposes. ================ So do weapons. What are the valuable purposes of assault weapons that are comparable to the valuable purposes of cars? ======================== LOL Tap, tap, tap. First it's does it have a need? As if 'need' is the determenat as to whether an object can be owned. Now it's a 'valuable' need! You really don't have a clue, do you, liarman. What a surprise, the coward isn't going to answer! Here's what you said: see above! === KMAN: cars have many other valid and valuable purposes. rick: So do weapons === So, coward, why are you being a scumbag and refusing to name those valid and valuable purposes of assault weapons? |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
"KMAN" wrote in message ... in article t, rick at wrote on 3/1/05 11:01 PM: "KMAN" wrote in message ... in article et, rick at wrote on 3/1/05 5:20 PM: snip... Here, let me restore your dishonesty again, liar.. "No, you brought up the "need" of an object being the determination whether or not people should have them. You lost, again, and now have you resort to your ignorant spews... checkmate, proven liar..." What is the need for assault weapons to the general public? It's a valid question. They are only useful for spraying bullets. Why else do you need them? In response to this YOU brought up the fact that people get killed by cars. But cars have many other valid and valuable purposes. ================ So do weapons. What are the valuable purposes of assault weapons that are comparable to the valuable purposes of cars? ======================== LOL Tap, tap, tap. First it's does it have a need? As if 'need' is the determenat as to whether an object can be owned. Now it's a 'valuable' need! You really don't have a clue, do you, liarman. What a surprise, the coward isn't going to answer! Here's what you said: see above! === KMAN: cars have many other valid and valuable purposes. rick: So do weapons === So, coward, why are you being a scumbag and refusing to name those valid and valuable purposes of assault weapons? ====================== Because, liarman, unlike you, I don't purport to be the arbiter of what is useful, valuable, or necessary. That is the perogative of eack person, liarman. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Crimes Against Nature-- RFK, Jr. Interview | General | |||
Hybrid Mode
