A Usenet persona calling itself BCITORGB wrote:

Weiser says:
==============
He did. Evidence of Sarin was found on the battlefield, and numerous
Sarin-filled artillery shells were found. They were not used because
the
artillery commanders refused to fire them, knowing that if they did,
they
risked nuclear conflict.
===================

C'mon! Admit it! You're making this up as you go along. Either that, or
this is Faux News drivel.

Try CNN and the BBC


Weiser says:
=================
We reacted based on the best intelligence available at the time.
=====================

BULL****!

Really? Are you an intelligence agent with independent knowledge of what our
intelligence apparatus knew and when they knew it? I think not.

Your intelligence agencies may be good (or not), but other
nations do have intelligence agencies as well. How come they were
telling a different tale?

You mean like the French and Germans? Well, they came to different
conclusions because they were corruptly in bed with Saddam and had a profit
motive to dissuade us from invading.

They agreed with you on Afghanistan. They
disagreed on Iraq.

Who cares? We used OUR intelligence information, which we found more
reliable and credible. Not, of course, that the WMD issue was of primary
importance in the first place.


And there I was, sitting in a kayak in the Gulf islands, and even I had
this figured out. The lie was transparent.

Fortunately, you're not in charge of our intelligence system or our country.

--
Regards,
Scott Weiser

"I love the Internet, I no longer have to depend on
friends, family and co-workers, I can annoy people WORLDWIDE!" TM

© 2005 Scott Weiser