Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Weiser says:
================ The difference between the US system and socialized medicine is that under socialized medicine, the government runs the operation and dictates who gets what care when and at what cost. ================= OK, if that's your definition of socialized medicine, then Canada definitely does NOT qualify. Weiser says: ================== I think public schools are a big waste of money, and that people should seek out and pay for private school education for their children. =============== I might agree in those cases where football and cheerleading are the primary learning outcomes. Weiser says: =============== It is acceptable, however, for the federal and state government to supply funds to local schools...if they have no control over the use of the funds or control over teaching. =============== Yeah, and pigs might fly. What level of government is going to turn over huge wads of money only to let another level of government control that spending -- with no strings attached? This is NOT a matter of political conviction or a left-right thing. Your proposition is just not reality. In the long term, no government is going to dole out money with no accountabilty and without their finger in the pie. Weiser says: ================ Besides, public education is entirely different from health care. The costs of public education are easily calculable and controllable, ================== So, your point is what? That because figuring costs out in healthcare is difficult, we'll just not do healthcare. Wouldn't it be better to establish a metric for healthcare if that's an issue for you. Is that the Scott Weiser prescription: "If it's too hard to figure out, we won't do it." frtzw906 |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Crimes Against Nature-- RFK, Jr. Interview | General |