![]() |
On 10-Feb-2005, Melissa wrote:
It's a small start, but here's a project I'm following with great interest: http://www.haveblue.com/ Small is the key word. The amount of hydrogen (and hence electricity) you can generate will always be less than the amount of sunlight/wind you can capture. Boats currently use batteries to save power from sun/wind and don't get much total power. Hydrogen + fuel cell is just an expensive version of a battery. Hydrogen technologies are mostly hype, unfortunately. Mike |
On 10-Feb-2005, Scott Weiser wrote:
are trying to export that what they call "democracy". Wah. Democracy works. Socialism doesn't. The irony is that you didn't even get what he said. We care deeply what you think. We just think you're deluded and oppressed, and we want to educate you about the benefits of representative democracy and capitalism, which is what makes the US the most powerful, influential and free nation on the planet. So Americans are free and everyone else is oppressed? I guess you've never read the Patriot Act of other gross abuses of freedom. American influence is waning because of your arrogance and gradually declining economic status. 100 years ago, Britain was the world power; fifty years later it was broke and losing influence. Why should anyone believe the yanks will last any longer given that they pay almost no attention to the reality of what's going on around them? To assume that the US is the only free and democratic nation is both naive and a grotesque misrepresentation of facts. Mike |
On 11-Feb-2005, "Tinkerntom" wrote:
That is a pretty big generalization for someone who is only one small voice in Europe. It sounded to me like you were speaking for a whole lot of Euro voices, and others. Well, if you bother to listen to the rest of the world, you'll discover that Wilko's view is not uncommon in many other countries. I listen to English language radio broadcasts from many countries, including the Netherlands, Sweden, Czech Republic, South Africa etc. In fact, Radio Australia is on right now. There is a voice out there beyond America - you just have to listen. Mike |
On 10-Feb-2005, Scott Weiser wrote:
Are you stating that merely because conservatives of various political and religious persuasions work steadily and organize to achieve their common political objectives that this makes them all members of the "Christian Right?" No but Viguerie includes the Christian Right in the groups that he lumps together. They exist as organized groups that are able to be represented when they whole mess work together. Are you claiming that there is no Christian Right? All Christians are left wingers? Mike |
Michael Daly wrote:
On 10-Feb-2005, Scott Weiser wrote: are trying to export that what they call "democracy". Wah. Democracy works. Socialism doesn't. The irony is that you didn't even get what he said. Alas, that's not an uncommon occurrance with him and my remarks. That's why I've stopped bothering to respond to anything Scott spouts. So Americans are free and everyone else is oppressed? I guess you've never read the Patriot Act of other gross abuses of freedom. American influence is waning because of your arrogance and gradually declining economic status. 100 years ago, Britain was the world power; fifty years later it was broke and losing influence. Why should anyone believe the yanks will last any longer given that they pay almost no attention to the reality of what's going on around them? My guess is that within my lifetime that becomes very clear to everyone, even to the portion of the U.S. population that seems to have little idea about the existance of the world around them. I wonder who's next in playing the world's most dominant economy and military power. My bet is on Asia... Maybe our grandchildren will speak fluent Mandarin (or some other fruit) or Spanish as their main language? ;-) To assume that the US is the only free and democratic nation is both naive and a grotesque misrepresentation of facts. Today I got this sent to me by a Czech friend, who apologized because she know I have friends from the U.S.. I thought it was funny and in a way I think it's relevant to this discussion: --------------------------------------------------------------- NOTICE OF REVOCATION OF INDEPENDENCE To the citizens of the United States of America, In the light of your failure to elect a President of the USA and thus to govern yourselves, we hereby give notice of the revocation of your independence, effective today. Her Sovereign Majesty Queen Elizabeth II will resume monarchial duties over all states, commonwealths and other territories. Except Utah, which she does not fancy. Your new prime minister (The Right Honourable Tony Blair, MP for the 97.85% of you who have until now been unaware that there is a world outside your borders) will appoint a minister for America without the need for further elections. Congress and the Senate will be disbanded. A questionnaire will be circulated next year to determine whether any of you noticed. To aid in the transition to a British Crown Dependency, the following rules are introduced with immediate effect: 1. You should look up "revocation" in the Oxford English Dictionary. Then look up "aluminium". Check the pronunciation guide. You will be amazed at just how wrongly you have been pronouncing it. The letter 'U' will be reinstated in words such as 'favour' and 'neighbour', skipping the letter 'U' is nothing more than laziness on your part. Likewise, you will learn to spell 'doughnut' without skipping half the letters. You will end your love affair with the letter 'Z' (pronounced 'zed' not 'zee') and the suffix "ize" will be replaced by the suffix "ise". You will learn that the suffix 'burgh is pronounced 'burra' e.g. Edinburgh. You are welcome to respell Pittsburgh as 'Pittsberg' if you can't cope with correct pronunciation. Generally, you should raise your vocabulary to acceptable levels. Look up "vocabulary". Using the same twenty seven words interspersed with filler noises such as "like" and "you know" is an unacceptable and inefficient form of communication. Look up "interspersed". There will be no more 'bleeps' in the Jerry Springer show. If you're not old enough to cope with bad language then you shouldn't have chat shows. When you learn to develop your vocabulary then you won't have to use bad language as often. 2. There is no such thing as "US English". We will let Microsoft know on your behalf. The Microsoft spell-checker will be adjusted to take account of the reinstated letter 'u' and the elimination of "-ize". 3. You should learn to distinguish the English and Australian accents. It really isn't that hard. English accents are not limited to Cockney, upper-class twit or Mancunian (Daphne in Frasier). You will also have to learn how to understand regional accents - Scottish dramas such as "Taggart" will no longer be broadcast with subtitles. While we're talking about regions, you must learn that there is no such place as Devonshire in England. The name of the county is "Devon". If you persist in calling it Devonshire, all American States will become "shires" e.g. Texasshire, Floridashire, Louisianashire. 4. Hollywood will be required occasionally to cast English actors as the good guys. Hollywood will be required to cast English actors to play English characters. British sit-coms such as "Men Behaving Badly" or "Red Dwarf" will not be re-cast and watered down for a wishy-washy American audience who can't cope with the humour of occasional political incorrectness. 5. You should relearn your original national anthem, "God Save The Queen", but only after fully carrying out task 1. We would not want you to get confused and give up half way through. 6. You should stop playing American "football". There is only one kind of football. What you refer to as American "football" is not a very good game. The 2.15% of you who are aware that there is a world outside your borders may have noticed that no one else plays "American" football. You will no longer be allowed to play it, and should instead play proper football. Initially, it would be best if you played with the girls. It is a difficult game. Those of you brave enough will, in time, be allowed to play rugby (which is similar to American "football", but does not involve stopping for a rest every twenty seconds or wearing full kevlar body armour like nancies). We are hoping to get together at least a US rugby sevens side by 2005. You should stop playing baseball. It is not reasonable to host an event called the 'World Series' for a game which is not played outside of America. Since only 2.15% of you are aware that there is a world beyond your borders, your error is understandable. Instead of baseball, you will be allowed to play a girls' game called "rounders" which is baseball without fancy team strip, oversized gloves, collector cards or hotdogs. 7. You should declare war on Quebec and France, using nuclear weapons if they give you any merde. The 97.85% of you who were not aware that there is a world outside your borders should count yourselves lucky. The Russians have never been the bad guys. "Merde" is French for "****". You will no longer be allowed to own or carry guns. You will no longer be allowed to own or carry anything more dangerous in public than a vegetable peeler. Because we don't believe you are sensible enough to handle potentially dangerous items, you will require a permit if you wish to carry a vegetable peeler in public. 8. July 4th is no longer a public holiday. November 8th will be a new national holiday, but only in England. It will be called "Indecisive Day". 9. All American cars are hereby banned. They are crap and it is for your own good. When we show you German cars, you will understand what we mean. All road intersections will be replaced with roundabouts. You will start driving on the left with immediate effect. At the same time, you will go metric with immediate effect and without the benefit of conversion tables. Roundabouts and metrication will help you understand the British sense of humour. 10. You will learn to make real chips. Those things you call French fries are not real chips. Fries aren't even French, they are Belgian though 97.85% of you (including the guy who discovered fries while in Europe) are not aware of a country called Belgium. Those things you insist on calling potato chips are properly called "crisps". Real chips are thick cut and fried in animal fat. The traditional accompaniment to chips is beer which should be served warm and flat. Waitresses will be trained to be more aggressive with customers. 11. As a sign of penance 5 grams of sea salt per cup will be added to all tea made within the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, this quantity to be doubled for tea made within the city of Boston itself. 12. The cold tasteless stuff you insist on calling beer is not actually beer at all, it is lager. From November 1st only proper British Bitter will be referred to as "beer", and European brews of known and accepted provenance will be referred to as "Lager". The substances formerly known as "American Beer" will henceforth be refered to as "Near-Frozen Knat's Urine", with the exception of the product of the American Budweiser company whose product will be referred to as "Weak Near-Frozen Knat's Urine". This will allow true Budweiser (as manufactured for the last 1000 years in Pilsen, Czech Republic) to be sold without risk of confusion. 13. From November 1st the UK will harmonise petrol (or "Gasoline" as you will be permitted to keep calling it until April 1st 2001) prices with the former USA. The UK will harmonise its prices to those of the former USA and the Former USA will, in return, adopt UK petrol prices (roughly $6/US gallon - get used to it). 14. You will learn to resolve personal issues without using guns, lawyers or therapists. The fact that you need so many lawyers and therapists shows that you're not adult enough to be independent. Guns should only be handled by adults. If you're not adult enough to sort things out without suing someone or speaking to a therapist then you’re not grown up enough to handle a gun. 15. Please tell us who killed JFK. It's been driving us crazy. Tax collectors from Her Majesty's Government will be with you shortly to ensure the acquisition of all revenues due (backdated to 1776). Thank you for your cooperation. --------------------------------------------------------------- -- Wilko van den Bergh wilko(a t)dse(d o t)nl Eindhoven The Netherlands Europe ---Look at the possibilities, don't worry about the limitations.--- http://wilko.webzone.ru/ |
Michael Daly wrote: On 11-Feb-2005, "Tinkerntom" wrote: That is a pretty big generalization for someone who is only one small voice in Europe. It sounded to me like you were speaking for a whole lot of Euro voices, and others. Well, if you bother to listen to the rest of the world, you'll discover that Wilko's view is not uncommon in many other countries. I listen to English language radio broadcasts from many countries, including the Netherlands, Sweden, Czech Republic, South Africa etc. In fact, Radio Australia is on right now. There is a voice out there beyond America - you just have to listen. Mike Fact is when 10:00 news comes on I will often watch CH12 which is BBC, just for a different perspective. I use to really enjoy Dollywall (sp?) I currently try to review numerous internet news sites from the world. But it seems that mostly I find 1 or 2 min sound bites, all coming from the same wire service. Seems that Americans are not the only one with short attention span. An example is the tsunami. I told my wife that within two months you would have trouble finding an international news article about it. Same with so many other crisis type stories. On the other hand try finding a story that has to do with the everyday life of some unknown in some remote part of the world, like Canada. Also very difficult. That is why I find discussions with the NG enlightening, you all are real people. Not just some journalist figment of imagination. Sometimes the realness rubs the wrong way, but we can work around that. TnT |
Michael Daly wrote: On 10-Feb-2005, Scott Weiser wrote: Are you stating that merely because conservatives of various political and religious persuasions work steadily and organize to achieve their common political objectives that this makes them all members of the "Christian Right?" No but Viguerie includes the Christian Right in the groups that he lumps together. They exist as organized groups that are able to be represented when they whole mess work together. Are you claiming that there is no Christian Right? All Christians are left wingers? Mike Mike, I live here in Denver, only a short distance from Colorado Springs, and Focus on the Family. During the recent election, noone ever knocked on our door. I did receive a few calls, reminding me to vote. Not necessarily right or left, just vote. Nationally Colorado voted for Bush, but locally, we voted blue. The Statehouse was taken over in both the Senate and House by Dems, and we sent two new dems to the US Congress. If the FC's were such a powerful and overwhelming force in poitics, you would think they would have more sway here at home. But we are a really confused lot here in Colorado, must be the high altitude! Fact of the matter, there is a growing number of Christians involved in the political process but they are not all right wing conservatives, just willing to be active and involved, and can make alot of "noise". The media loves noise, gives them something to talk about. TnT |
TnT said:
============== But I also know that some bearded warlord in Afganistan does affect us as well. I suspect that was part of the biggest shock to many Americans on 9/11. Our bubble burst. We all live in a world where we affect one another. ================= I don't mean to appear callous, but I think part of the problem lies with a nation that has lived virtually untouched by the reast of the world for 2 centuries. A nation that could afford to practice isolationist policies. When your "bubble burst", you couldn't believe it. And you likely over-reacted (see other posts putting the casualities into perspective -- and I truly mean no disrespect to the innocent victims of the bearded warlord). Other nations, not isolated from neighbors by a huge ocean, better understand the interconnectedness. By all means, go after the warlord (as you know, most other nations supported you in those efforts). But don't try to con the world into believing that a secular dictator has anything in common with a religious fundamentalist (in this case, I'm referring to Osama) who despises secularism. That, and WMD were thinly veiled excuses to gain control of oil. TnT says: =============== That does not mean that we should just go along with the other parts of the world, but that we should attempt to influence them with what we believe. ================== That's a tad arrogant, don't you think? When should I expect American troops strolling down my boulevard and knocking on my door so as to "influence" me to "believe" in the American dream? Cheers, frtzw906 |
TnT says:
=============== You say though that we are out of step with the prevailing global position. Can you share what you feel that opinion generally would amount to. I have heard so much scuttlebut about left and right, red an blue, that I am interested in your fresh insight. That way we could discuss specifics. ================== There is too much to comment on. Let's start by recalling polling done in many (I can only assume all) western, developed nations. In not one poll did the people of these nations prefer Bush over Kerry. In fact, had the election been global, it would have been a clear landslide for the Democrats. As to specifics, there are too many to mention. Here's a few (comparing Republican doctrine with prevailing western attitudes outside of the USA): abortion, capital punishment, decriminalization of recreational drugs, gay unions, possession of unnecessay firearms, Kyoto,..... and on, and on, and on.... Cheers, frtzw906 ========== |
Scott Weiser says:
============ representative democracy and capitalism are the most effective way to ensure liberty, freedom and justice for all. ================ Like the Queen of Hearts, you are free to define words anyway you please. And, yes, I know that you Americans have your own specific definition of "representative democracy". I'd like to suggest, however, that you're playing fast and loose with the definition of "representative". You've had elections where a significant proportion of your electorate (hundreds of thousands? millions? you're the American, you'll know the exact data.) voted Green in the hope that their view of the world would be represented in your Congress. But the system of government your hold up as praiseworthy disrespects the ballots of Green voters. How is that representative? Or, even more dramatically, in recent history, how was your process "representative" when it ignored the wishes of millions who cast ballots for Ross Perot and the Reform Party. I accept your answer if you tell me that that's the American system, that all candidates and parties are aware of the system, and that everyone has to live with the consequences of that system. Fair enough! It's YOUR system. But please don't hold it up as an ideal. Please don't presume to lecture, for example, the Germans, about "representatve" democracy. You'll note that the voices of Greens and Perot-like politicians in German are heard in their parliament. Maybe, one day, when you bring your system into the 20th century (never mind the 21st), others will listen. "Representative" indeed! Cheers, frtzw906 |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:46 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com