ROTFLMAO.

Hurtwit the hypocrite hit his stride just after the ecstacy kicked in
and wrote:

BTW: Let's see if you can live by your own rules now. I summarized
them
for you:


1. No name calling. You can start by dropping the childish change of
my
last name.
2. No dicussions of people...just boats. No politics. No religion.
No
union talk.
3. Serious boating discussion only. No joking around about anything
related to boats. You must remain focussed and serious.
4. No personal attacks. I don't want to hear "but Mom, he started
it".


Now that we have that straight let me say a couple of more things.


One can be a boater yet not want to constantly participate in boating
only
discussions in a remote boating NG. If a topic is not of interest why

participate in it? Do you just talk boats 24/7 Chuck?


I have seen boating topics being discussed ad nauseum. I have seen
boating
topics discussed here that turned into nothing but name calling and
personal
attacks. Boating was still being discussed so I guess that is
acceptable to
you.


You don't set the rules nor dictate them to me. I do hope, however,
that
*you* start following the rules you have now set.

************

Responses:

To "BTW:.........." I never set any rules nor proposed any. The last
time we exchanged thoughts on this subject was after I objected to one
of your insulting posts in which you called me a "liar".
Do you recall that your response was "Liar isn't an insult, because I
believe it to be true"? Do you recall that I then reserved the right to
make statements about you, and that the standard shall be that as long
as I sincerely believe them to be true you cannot, in return, complain
about insult? I believe you are of less than average intellect, display
some serious emotional or personality disorders, and show no real
interest or ability to ever participate in this group, (in a
constructive way), in any on-topic discussion. I believe you make every
effort to drag on-topic discussions down to the flame war level so you
can be somehow involved. None of those statements can be considered
insulting, under the terms and definition you advanced when explaing
why calling me a "liar" each time you disagreed with one of my
opionions was not an insult.

To: No name changing....... Sorry hurtwit, take that up with "Chucky."

To: No discussion of politics, unions, religion, etc........I am
willing to discuss any topic that somebody cares to raise. Once in a
while there's a reasonable person on the other end of the argument, but
all too often just somebody trolling for a flame.

To: Serious discussion only..........Why? This pastime is supposed to
be fun. You may find this surprising, but for a lot of people fun
doesn't revolve around being as anti-social and destructive as
possible.

To: NO personal attacks.....Puhleaze. That would shut you down,
completely and immediately.

To: "I don't want to hear "But, Mom, he started it....." don't worry
hurtwit. You won't hear that.There's not one chance in a million I'd
ever confuse you with my Mom.

To: Do I just talk boats 24/7? No. Of course not. But the difference
between us, (and the reason I say you are not a boater), is that I
often do- and can- talk about boats. Well enough that some of my
opinions are controversial.

To: "I have seen boating topics discussed here that turned into nothing
but name calling and personal attacks". I agree. Shall we use the 260
Defiance thread as an example? You have had a very up front and
personal view of boating threads turning into flame wars and exchanges
of personal attacks.

To: ........start following the rules you have now set. Sorry, hurtwit.
I haven't set any rules. I don't expect you to follow any rules,
either, or to post in a civil manner. It would be nice however if you'd
stop wailing and bawling when somebody hands you a bucket load of your
own crap in return.

Be proud of who and what you are. Why pee and moan when people
acknowledge your particular role in the world or "unique" contributions
to a NG? Take a lesson from your new psycophant in this regard, she's
twice as destructive as you are and revels in her glory. :-)

wrote in message
oups.com...
ROTFLMAO.

Hurtwit the hypocrite hit his stride just after the ecstacy kicked in
and wrote:

BTW: Let's see if you can live by your own rules now. I summarized
them
for you:


1. No name calling. You can start by dropping the childish change of
my
last name.
2. No dicussions of people...just boats. No politics. No religion.
No
union talk.
3. Serious boating discussion only. No joking around about anything
related to boats. You must remain focussed and serious.
4. No personal attacks. I don't want to hear "but Mom, he started
it".


Now that we have that straight let me say a couple of more things.


One can be a boater yet not want to constantly participate in boating
only
discussions in a remote boating NG. If a topic is not of interest why

participate in it? Do you just talk boats 24/7 Chuck?


I have seen boating topics being discussed ad nauseum. I have seen
boating
topics discussed here that turned into nothing but name calling and
personal
attacks. Boating was still being discussed so I guess that is
acceptable to
you.


You don't set the rules nor dictate them to me. I do hope, however,
that
*you* start following the rules you have now set.

************

Responses:

To "BTW:.........." I never set any rules nor proposed any. The last
time we exchanged thoughts on this subject was after I objected to one
of your insulting posts in which you called me a "liar".
Do you recall that your response was "Liar isn't an insult, because I
believe it to be true"? Do you recall that I then reserved the right to
make statements about you, and that the standard shall be that as long
as I sincerely believe them to be true you cannot, in return, complain
about insult? I believe you are of less than average intellect, display
some serious emotional or personality disorders, and show no real
interest or ability to ever participate in this group, (in a
constructive way), in any on-topic discussion. I believe you make every
effort to drag on-topic discussions down to the flame war level so you
can be somehow involved. None of those statements can be considered
insulting, under the terms and definition you advanced when explaing
why calling me a "liar" each time you disagreed with one of my
opionions was not an insult.

To: No name changing....... Sorry hurtwit, take that up with "Chucky."

To: No discussion of politics, unions, religion, etc........I am
willing to discuss any topic that somebody cares to raise. Once in a
while there's a reasonable person on the other end of the argument, but
all too often just somebody trolling for a flame.

To: Serious discussion only..........Why? This pastime is supposed to
be fun. You may find this surprising, but for a lot of people fun
doesn't revolve around being as anti-social and destructive as
possible.

To: NO personal attacks.....Puhleaze. That would shut you down,
completely and immediately.

To: "I don't want to hear "But, Mom, he started it....." don't worry
hurtwit. You won't hear that.There's not one chance in a million I'd
ever confuse you with my Mom.

To: Do I just talk boats 24/7? No. Of course not. But the difference
between us, (and the reason I say you are not a boater), is that I
often do- and can- talk about boats. Well enough that some of my
opinions are controversial.

To: "I have seen boating topics discussed here that turned into nothing
but name calling and personal attacks". I agree. Shall we use the 260
Defiance thread as an example? You have had a very up front and
personal view of boating threads turning into flame wars and exchanges
of personal attacks.

To: ........start following the rules you have now set. Sorry, hurtwit.
I haven't set any rules. I don't expect you to follow any rules,
either, or to post in a civil manner. It would be nice however if you'd
stop wailing and bawling when somebody hands you a bucket load of your
own crap in return.

Be proud of who and what you are. Why pee and moan when people
acknowledge your particular role in the world or "unique" contributions
to a NG? Take a lesson from your new psycophant in this regard, she's
twice as destructive as you are and revels in her glory. :-)


Chuck Gould posted the following rules on 2/10/05 at 2:10 p.m. est in
rec.boats. I added some personal observations in parenthesis:



Chuck's rule #1. No name calling. (You can start by dropping the childish
change of my
last name.)



Chuck's rule #2. No discussions about people No politics. No religion.
No
union talk. No talk about war. Boat talk only.


Chuck's rule #3. Serious boating discussion only. No joking around about
anything
related to boats or anything else. One must remain focused and serious when
discussing boating.


Chuck's rule #4. No personal attacks. (I don't want to hear "but Mom, he
started it".)



Chuck's rule #5. A contributor to rec.boats is rated only on the percentage
of boating related topics he/she contributes to the NG. In order to be
considered a contributor one must be 100% on topic with no side bars on non
related items. See rule #3. Chuck Gould will be the ultimate judge as to
ones rating.



Chuck has failed to live by his own rules.



A real shame as he was once a great contributor to this NG.

"JimH" wrote in message
...



A real shame as he was once a great contributor to this NG.

Isn't he long overdue for another sabbatical?

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"JimH" wrote in message
...



A real shame as he was once a great contributor to this NG.

Isn't he long overdue for another sabbatical?


Yep. Time for him to pick up his ball and bat and run home to Mommy again
like he did a year or two ago. If I recall correctly he threatened never
to return again......yet he did, and with a vengeance.

He is once again showing all the signs of being over the edge. Perhaps
Krause's wife could offer an on line diagnosis of his problems.

Something to note: He is not following the rules he set this afternoon at
2:10 p.m. est. I added some personal observations in parenthesis:


Chuck's rule #1. No name calling. (You can start by dropping the childish
change of my
last name.)



Chuck's rule #2. No discussions about people No politics. No religion.
No
union talk. No talk about war. Boat talk only.


Chuck's rule #3. Serious boating discussion only. No joking around about
anything
related to boats or anything else. One must remain focused and serious when
discussing boating.


Chuck's rule #4. No personal attacks. (I don't want to hear "but Mom, he
started it".)



Chuck's rule #5. A contributor to rec.boats is rated only on the percentage
of boating related topics he/she contributes to the NG. In order to be
considered a contributor one must be 100% on topic with no side bars on non
related items. See rule #3. Chuck Gould will be the ultimate judge as to
ones rating.


Chuck has broken all his rules several times today. He has been a bad boy.

Personal note to Chuck: Take a break from this NG. It would be the best
thing for you.;-)

hurtwit the hypocrite repeated his lie:

Something to note: He is not following the rules he set this afternoon
at
2:10 p.m. est.

**********************************************

I did not post any rules at 2:10 PM or any other time.

Who has gone over the edge here? Not me.

wrote in message
oups.com...
hurtwit the hypocrite repeated his lie:

Something to note: He is not following the rules he set this afternoon
at
2:10 p.m. est.

**********************************************

I did not post any rules at 2:10 PM or any other time.

Who has gone over the edge here? Not me.


Chuck Gould posted the following rules on 2/10/05 at 2:10 p.m. est in
rec.boats. I added some personal observations in parenthesis:



Chuck's rule #1. No name calling. (You can start by dropping the childish
change of my
last name.)



Broken at least 7 times today after he himself set the rules.



Shame, shame Chuck. Time for you to take a break and run home with your
ball and bat like you did a year or so ago. You are losing it Chuck.

Harry wrote:

They're garbage. That's all. And you, Chuckster, encourage them by
responding directly to their posts.


******************

That's uncharitable, Harry.

JimH is obviously under some serious emotional stress right now. His
wife has been ill, and maybe he's losing whatever grip he used to have.
He has made it his life's work to follow me around and lob insults. Who
knows why? But there's still some redeemable qualities in everybody,
even a guy who lives for flame wars and seeks to start as many as he
can.

The other guys you mention appear here so seldom they don't amount to
much. Herring is an exception. John is an asset to the group, as is
NOYB.

None of these people are garbage. Don't forget to take a progressive
view of the situation. We libs are supposed to be tolerant, it's the
right wingers who are supposed to yell (as JimH is now doing) "conform
to my standards or get the hell out of here", not the enlightened and
tolerant lefties. :-)

wrote in message
oups.com...
Harry wrote:

They're garbage. That's all. And you, Chuckster, encourage them by
responding directly to their posts.


******************

That's uncharitable, Harry.

JimH is obviously under some serious emotional stress right now. His
wife has been ill, and maybe he's losing whatever grip he used to have.
He has made it his life's work to follow me around and lob insults. Who
knows why? But there's still some redeemable qualities in everybody,
even a guy who lives for flame wars and seeks to start as many as he
can.

The other guys you mention appear here so seldom they don't amount to
much. Herring is an exception. John is an asset to the group, as is
NOYB.

None of these people are garbage. Don't forget to take a progressive
view of the situation. We libs are supposed to be tolerant, it's the
right wingers who are supposed to yell (as JimH is now doing) "conform
to my standards or get the hell out of here", not the enlightened and
tolerant lefties. :-)



Chuck Gould posted the following rules on 2/10/05 at 2:10 p.m. EST in
rec.boats. I added some personal observations in parenthesis:



Chuck's rule #1. No name calling. (You can start by dropping the childish
change of my
last name.)



Chuck's rule #2. No discussions about people No politics. No religion.
No
union talk. No talk about war. Boat talk only.


Chuck's rule #3. Serious boating discussion only. No joking around about
anything
related to boats or anything else. One must remain focused and serious when
discussing boating.


Chuck's rule #4. No personal attacks. (I don't want to hear "but Mom, he
started it".)



Chuck's rule #5. A contributor to rec.boats is rated only on the percentage
of boating related topics he/she contributes to the NG. In order to be
considered a contributor one must be 100% on topic with no side bars on non
related items. See rule #3. Chuck Gould will be the ultimate judge as to
ones rating.



Since he posted these rules he has broken all of them numerous times.


I think it is time for Chuck to step away from this NG and take a break from
it like he did a year or so ago.

hurtwit the hypocrite wrote:

Since he posted these rules he has broken all of them numerous times.


I think it is time for Chuck to step away from this NG and take a break
from
it like he did a year or so ago.


*************

Has the medication not worn off, yet, to the point where you remember
that *you* posted the rules you have been attributing to me?

If you are actually this confused you really need some help. If you're
just pretending to be demented, you are a seriously sad *******.

"JimH" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
oups.com...
Harry wrote:

They're garbage. That's all. And you, Chuckster, encourage them by
responding directly to their posts.


******************

That's uncharitable, Harry.

JimH is obviously under some serious emotional stress right now. His
wife has been ill, and maybe he's losing whatever grip he used to have.
He has made it his life's work to follow me around and lob insults. Who
knows why? But there's still some redeemable qualities in everybody,
even a guy who lives for flame wars and seeks to start as many as he
can.

The other guys you mention appear here so seldom they don't amount to
much. Herring is an exception. John is an asset to the group, as is
NOYB.

None of these people are garbage. Don't forget to take a progressive
view of the situation. We libs are supposed to be tolerant, it's the
right wingers who are supposed to yell (as JimH is now doing) "conform
to my standards or get the hell out of here", not the enlightened and
tolerant lefties. :-)



Chuck Gould posted the following rules on 2/10/05 at 2:10 p.m. EST in
rec.boats. I added some personal observations in parenthesis:



Chuck's rule #1. No name calling. (You can start by dropping the
childish
change of my
last name.)



Chuck's rule #2. No discussions about people No politics. No
religion.
No
union talk. No talk about war. Boat talk only.


Chuck's rule #3. Serious boating discussion only. No joking around
about
anything
related to boats or anything else. One must remain focused and serious
when
discussing boating.


Chuck's rule #4. No personal attacks. (I don't want to hear "but Mom,
he
started it".)



Chuck's rule #5. A contributor to rec.boats is rated only on the
percentage
of boating related topics he/she contributes to the NG. In order to be
considered a contributor one must be 100% on topic with no side bars on
non
related items. See rule #3. Chuck Gould will be the ultimate judge as
to
ones rating.



Since he posted these rules he has broken all of them numerous times.


I think it is time for Chuck to step away from this NG and take a break
from
it like he did a year or so ago.



Once again, we have the liebrals whining about the very things they are
guilty of.