"JimH" wrote in message
...

Nice spin. Nice try. No cigar Chucky.

Now go get that stash of hundred dollar bills slipped under your door last
night by XX Boat Company and finish your "unbiased" review of their boat.
Remember, nothing but positives and do remember to stretch the truth as
much
as possible. Oh those advertising dollars from XX Boat Company will
surely
start to sprout.


JimH,

Obviously you did not read the original post. If Chuck is hyping boat
builders, why is he writing an article about a boat built 38 years ago?
From the post at the top of the thread: "Among many hundreds of designs, he
drew this month's NW Classic, 'My Gal', built in 1967 at Vic Franck's
Boatyard on Portage Bay."

"Snafu" wrote in message
...

"JimH" wrote in message
...

Nice spin. Nice try. No cigar Chucky.

Now go get that stash of hundred dollar bills slipped under your door
last
night by XX Boat Company and finish your "unbiased" review of their boat.
Remember, nothing but positives and do remember to stretch the truth as
much
as possible. Oh those advertising dollars from XX Boat Company will
surely
start to sprout.


JimH,

Obviously you did not read the original post. If Chuck is hyping boat
builders, why is he writing an article about a boat built 38 years ago?
From the post at the top of the thread: "Among many hundreds of designs,
he
drew this month's NW Classic, 'My Gal', built in 1967 at Vic Franck's
Boatyard on Portage Bay."



I was referring to a previous boat review of his.

Hurtwit wrote:


I was referring to a previous boat review of his

***************

But unable to point out even a single inaccuracy, and unable to
formulate a contrary opinion,
you reduced your comment to your specialty, personal attack. Thinking
of buying a boat again, one of these days, Hurtwit, or are you going to
be one of the bitter old non-boating reactionaries with no purpose here
and nothing to contribute exept negativity and bile?

wrote in message
oups.com...
Hurtwit wrote:


I was referring to a previous boat review of his

***************

But unable to point out even a single inaccuracy, and unable to
formulate a contrary opinion,
you reduced your comment to your specialty, personal attack. Thinking
of buying a boat again, one of these days, Hurtwit, or are you going to
be one of the bitter old non-boating reactionaries with no purpose here
and nothing to contribute exept negativity and bile?


Sort of like you have been and are currently doing. I used to make fun of
folks names when I was a little kid. I see you never outgrew that. A
shame.

On 6 Feb 2005 09:25:36 -0800, wrote:

Hurtwit wrote:


I was referring to a previous boat review of his

***************

But unable to point out even a single inaccuracy, and unable to
formulate a contrary opinion,
you reduced your comment to your specialty, personal attack. Thinking
of buying a boat again, one of these days, Hurtwit, or are you going to
be one of the bitter old non-boating reactionaries with no purpose here
and nothing to contribute exept negativity and bile?

Chuck, I noticed not one derogatory comment about the 260 Defiance, nor did I
notice a comparison to any other boats. How would you compare the 260 Defiance
and the 26' Osprey Fisherman? Or, for that matter, any of the other 26' boat
made in the northwest. Is the 260 Defiance a better boat than many other brands.
Why, or why not?

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

This article was not a boat review, it was a fluff piece for a magazine
whose existence is dependent upon the advertisers for the same products they
are reviewing.

It is possible the boat is the ideal boat, but you will never be able to
tell from a "boat review" in a boating magazine. Anyone who uses a boating
magazine as a basis for purchasing a boat, gets what he deserves.


John H" wrote in message
news
On 6 Feb 2005 09:25:36 -0800, wrote:

Hurtwit wrote:


I was referring to a previous boat review of his

***************

But unable to point out even a single inaccuracy, and unable to
formulate a contrary opinion,
you reduced your comment to your specialty, personal attack. Thinking
of buying a boat again, one of these days, Hurtwit, or are you going to
be one of the bitter old non-boating reactionaries with no purpose here
and nothing to contribute exept negativity and bile?

Chuck, I noticed not one derogatory comment about the 260 Defiance, nor
did I
notice a comparison to any other boats. How would you compare the 260
Defiance
and the 26' Osprey Fisherman? Or, for that matter, any of the other 26'
boat
made in the northwest. Is the 260 Defiance a better boat than many other
brands.
Why, or why not?

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to
resolve it."
Rene Descartes

wrote:
Hurtwit wrote:


I was referring to a previous boat review of his

***************

But unable to point out even a single inaccuracy, and unable to
formulate a contrary opinion,
you reduced your comment to your specialty, personal attack. Thinking
of buying a boat again, one of these days, Hurtwit, or are you going to
be one of the bitter old non-boating reactionaries with no purpose here
and nothing to contribute exept negativity and bile?


Woohoo the political OT king & spam man Gould still tries to bend the
truth?? sorry Chuckles you claimed a boat has a hand laid hull when it
plain just didn't!!! you also went along with a 20ft wl boat being
billed as a 26ftr, which is a stretch in more ways than one:-) But why
the deceptions?? are you just an inexperienced simpleton, not unusual in
used car salesmen nor used boat spruikers; or bent?? that's the only 2
options you really have at this stage.

So post your evidence that the boat does indeed have a "hand laid hull"
& I'll post my rejoinder pasted from the makers own web site, then I
guess the question will be answered, just as it was with another of your
little "fudges" the 28ft full cabin boat doing 18 knts on "about" 6 gals
per hour, or were they Gould gallons????? the same Gould gallons that
have helped you fudge every time???? You just parrot marketing BS,
nothing less!!!

Just about all your so called "articles" are just deceptive marketing spam.

K

So the Krause lie of the day??? Here ya go:-)

So just getting back to the Hatt 43 lie:-) What happened was at
least 2 of the NG people lived near where he "claimed" he did & said
they'd settle if he owned a Hatt 43 or not by simply calling around &
taking a look:-) After all his usual abuse & fained "privacy" concerns
it was starting to look like his lying hide was about to be hung out to
dry:-)

This would be more than his ego could even contemplate, so in his
desperation not to be caught red handed (again:-)) he then lied again;
which despite it being totally unbelievable it allowed his damaged mind
to think he was still the big man his lies had created:-)

Doubt save to organise employment wrecking union strokes he's never
even been to Florida but he desperately needed to get away from the lie
mansion & the lie Hatt 43:-)





We had the Hatteras for two years. Last year, out of the cold clear,
a broker approached me with an offer to buy. Our continued Florida
lifestyle was somewhat up in the air, because the two breadwinners
hereabouts were about to be offered long-term but temporary assignments
they could not refuse in the Washington, D.C., area. So, after being
romanced a little, we sold the Hatt for almost precisely what we paid
for it. Not bad, after two full years of use. And I mean full years. So,
we didn't "make" any money off the Hatt, but we didn't lose any, either.
The proceeds were prudently invested.

SNAFU wrote:

imH,

Obviously you did not read the original post. If Chuck is hyping boat
builders, why is he writing an article about a boat built 38 years ago?

From the post at the top of the thread: "Among many hundreds of
designs, he
drew this month's NW Classic, 'My Gal', built in 1967 at Vic Franck's
Boatyard on Portage Bay."

*********************************

Hurtwit doesn't need a *real* excuse to make personal attacks. He's got
a mental hard-on right now because Karen Smith is once again on the
loose, and he thinks he has a new "ally" in his cause. :-)

wrote:
SNAFU wrote:

imH,

Obviously you did not read the original post. If Chuck is hyping boat
builders, why is he writing an article about a boat built 38 years ago?

From the post at the top of the thread: "Among many hundreds of
designs, he
drew this month's NW Classic, 'My Gal', built in 1967 at Vic Franck's
Boatyard on Portage Bay."

*********************************

Hurtwit doesn't need a *real* excuse to make personal attacks. He's got
a mental hard-on right now because Karen Smith is once again on the
loose, and he thinks he has a new "ally" in his cause. :-)


I'm not on the loose:-) I'm merely reviewing your spamming BS & calling
it for what it is:-)

What's really sad is that most here just accept & swallow the marketing
crap you dish up.

But hey this is easily settled you need to deal with my objections, is
it a hand laid hull??? give us the proof after all it's your article
surely you will be glad to show that you tell the truth??? while you're
at it with a WL beam of 7 1/2 ft & Wl of 20; is it something fairly
billed as a 26ftr???

No spam man if you want to run deceptive ads here expect them to be
reviewed & as always I'll give the fullest of reasons why I say what I
say so you can actually answer, instead of BS around around about how
mean it is to call your ads as they are.

So which is it Gould just dumb as dog dirt or outright bent??

K

So the Krause lie of the day??? Here ya go:-)

So just getting back to the Hatt 43 lie:-) What happened was at
least 2 of the NG people lived near where he "claimed" he did & said
they'd settle if he owned a Hatt 43 or not by simply calling around &
taking a look:-) After all his usual abuse & fained "privacy" concerns
it was starting to look like his lying hide was about to be hung out to
dry:-)

This would be more than his ego could even contemplate, so in his
desperation not to be caught red handed (again:-)) he then lied again;
which despite it being totally unbelievable it allowed his damaged mind
to think he was still the big man his lies had created:-)

Doubt save to organise employment wrecking union strokes he's never
even been to Florida but he desperately needed to get away from the lie
mansion & the lie Hatt 43:-)





We had the Hatteras for two years. Last year, out of the cold clear,
a broker approached me with an offer to buy. Our continued Florida
lifestyle was somewhat up in the air, because the two breadwinners
hereabouts were about to be offered long-term but temporary assignments
they could not refuse in the Washington, D.C., area. So, after being
romanced a little, we sold the Hatt for almost precisely what we paid
for it. Not bad, after two full years of use. And I mean full years. So,
we didn't "make" any money off the Hatt, but we didn't lose any, either.
The proceeds were prudently invested.