....but we digress. Nice article about "My Gal" (the original topic of this
thread), Chuck.


"Harry Kruase" wrote in message
...
Yup


Its a good thing at my age that I don't have to worry about money at my
time,,

You know that I own a mansion and a yacht,,, I will of course still
receive
my benefits that my grandchildren will pay for,, but who cares,, not me,,
not harry,

But I have all the boats and homes and acreage and deer and buffalo I need
for now.

I travel extensively, I mean daily and earn an income most nations would
dream of ( I know I post from the same IP) but I own satellites to take
care
of all that, not really sure how it works in all but my IT/IS division
takes
care of all that for me.

Yup,,, never have to worry about social security will I,,,,














"hkrause" wrote in message
news:1107650773.3dbeb19816cb3fbd8b676eb1a754ac06@t eranews...
Don White wrote:
"John H" wrote in message
...

The 'progressives' don't seem to want to be so with regard to social

security.

They seem more concerned with preserving the status quo.

John H



What's the problem with social security? Here the Gov't just doubled
the
premiums from both the employee and employer to make sure the system
doesn't
implode as the baby boom generation gets ready to draw. (Canada Pension
Plan)




The problem with social security is that Bush wants to establish a
payoff
for his buddies on Wall Street, and the partial privatization he
proposes
will do just that.

There are many ways to fix the far in the future social security
problems
without doing away with the current program.