In article , "Dutch"
wrote:

"Ron" wrote in message
...
In article , "Dutch"
wrote:

"JohnH" wrote in message
news On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 17:27:04 -0800, "Dutch" wrote:


"JohnH" wrote

Rudy, could you be so kind as to remove rec.boats from the list of
sites you're cross posting this thread to?

We'd appreciate it, for sure.

John H

John

I understand your frustration, but can't you simply kill the thread in
your
newsreader?

The problem with your suggestion is that you have presumed to speak for
every single person reading rec.boats, and I am sure that some of them
have
a few interests other than boats.


Yes, of course you're probably right. I'm sure there is at least one
person in rec.boats who wants to know which of you, Rudy, and Ron are
queer for the other.

There you go...

Anything from the eating disordered is suspect. Denial is a terrible
symptom of any disorder. "Hi, I'm Dutch. I have an eating disorder."

Did I hurt your iddy-biddy feelings somewhere, is that it? Does he need a
big hug?

How could *you* hurt *my* feelings? I think you overestimate your impact
on me.

"Ron" wrote in message
...
In article , "Dutch"
wrote:

"Ron" wrote in message
...
In article , "Dutch"
wrote:

"JohnH" wrote in message
news On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 17:27:04 -0800, "Dutch" wrote:


"JohnH" wrote

Rudy, could you be so kind as to remove rec.boats from the list of
sites you're cross posting this thread to?

We'd appreciate it, for sure.

John H

John

I understand your frustration, but can't you simply kill the thread
in
your
newsreader?

The problem with your suggestion is that you have presumed to speak
for
every single person reading rec.boats, and I am sure that some of
them
have
a few interests other than boats.


Yes, of course you're probably right. I'm sure there is at least one
person in rec.boats who wants to know which of you, Rudy, and Ron
are
queer for the other.

There you go...

Anything from the eating disordered is suspect. Denial is a terrible
symptom of any disorder. "Hi, I'm Dutch. I have an eating disorder."

Did I hurt your iddy-biddy feelings somewhere, is that it? Does he need a
big hug?

How could *you* hurt *my* feelings? I think you overestimate your impact
on me.

My estimate is based on clear evidence, your obsessive dogging of my tracks
attempting to find holes in my arguments. You have been trying for a couple
of weeks, ever since I rebuffed your first attempts convince me I was
bullying SN.

In article , "Dutch"
wrote:

"Ron" wrote in message
...
In article , "Dutch"
wrote:

"Ron" wrote in message
...
In article , "Dutch"
wrote:

"JohnH" wrote in message
news On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 17:27:04 -0800, "Dutch" wrote:


"JohnH" wrote

Rudy, could you be so kind as to remove rec.boats from the list of
sites you're cross posting this thread to?

We'd appreciate it, for sure.

John H

John

I understand your frustration, but can't you simply kill the thread
in
your
newsreader?

The problem with your suggestion is that you have presumed to speak
for
every single person reading rec.boats, and I am sure that some of
them
have
a few interests other than boats.


Yes, of course you're probably right. I'm sure there is at least one
person in rec.boats who wants to know which of you, Rudy, and Ron
are
queer for the other.

There you go...

Anything from the eating disordered is suspect. Denial is a terrible
symptom of any disorder. "Hi, I'm Dutch. I have an eating disorder."

Did I hurt your iddy-biddy feelings somewhere, is that it? Does he need a
big hug?

How could *you* hurt *my* feelings? I think you overestimate your impact
on me.

My estimate is based on clear evidence, your obsessive dogging of my tracks
attempting to find holes in my arguments. You have been trying for a couple
of weeks, ever since I rebuffed your first attempts convince me I was
bullying SN.

Once again, you overestimate your impact on me. I choose to participate
here because I choose it. I choose it for a variety of reasons. That you
make yourself the centre of my world is your choice.

We may be making headway in that you do seem to recognize that SN was
being bullied. Acknowledging that would be difficult, I imagine.

"Ron" wrote
Anything from the eating disordered is suspect. Denial is a
terrible
symptom of any disorder. "Hi, I'm Dutch. I have an eating disorder."

Did I hurt your iddy-biddy feelings somewhere, is that it? Does he
need a
big hug?

How could *you* hurt *my* feelings? I think you overestimate your
impact
on me.

My estimate is based on clear evidence, your obsessive dogging of my
tracks
attempting to find holes in my arguments. You have been trying for a
couple
of weeks, ever since I rebuffed your first attempts convince me I was
bullying SN.

Once again, you overestimate your impact on me. I choose to participate
here because I choose it.

That is tautological.

I choose it for a variety of reasons.

That is avoidance.

That you
make yourself the centre of my world is your choice.

The replies are TO ME.

We may be making headway in that you do seem to recognize that SN was
being bullied. Acknowledging that would be difficult, I imagine.

Again, you cannot resolve your insistence that people be left to their own
devices with your intervention in this case of so-called "bullying". SN is
clearly a voluntary participant or she would simply killfile the threads.
Such inconsistency is a signal that your thinking lacks a solid foundation.
I referred to it before as a failure to operate from your genuine self.

In article , "Dutch"
wrote:

"Ron" wrote
Anything from the eating disordered is suspect. Denial is a
terrible
symptom of any disorder. "Hi, I'm Dutch. I have an eating disorder."

Did I hurt your iddy-biddy feelings somewhere, is that it? Does he
need a
big hug?

How could *you* hurt *my* feelings? I think you overestimate your
impact
on me.

My estimate is based on clear evidence, your obsessive dogging of my
tracks
attempting to find holes in my arguments. You have been trying for a
couple
of weeks, ever since I rebuffed your first attempts convince me I was
bullying SN.

Once again, you overestimate your impact on me. I choose to participate
here because I choose it.

That is tautological.

I choose it for a variety of reasons.

That is avoidance.

That you
make yourself the centre of my world is your choice.

The replies are TO ME.

We may be making headway in that you do seem to recognize that SN was
being bullied. Acknowledging that would be difficult, I imagine.

Again, you cannot resolve your insistence that people be left to their own
devices with your intervention in this case of so-called "bullying". SN is
clearly a voluntary participant or she would simply killfile the threads.
Such inconsistency is a signal that your thinking lacks a solid foundation.
I referred to it before as a failure to operate from your genuine self.

Wrong. She has clearly asked that she not be treated this way. Her
request has been ignored. she has clearly stated that she chooses to be
in this group to discuss other issues and not to be verbally abused. The
bullies just refuse to do what she wants.

Her choice is to participate in the group. It is coincidence that others
are acting in this way towards her.

4 bullies picking one person is just cowardice. Control freaks unite.
Before you misconstrue my intent, you have stated that denial needs to
be addressed. Feel free to continue to be abusive to SN, but I did want
to address your denial.

"Ron" wrote in message
...
In article , "Dutch"
wrote:

"Ron" wrote
Anything from the eating disordered is suspect. Denial is a
terrible
symptom of any disorder. "Hi, I'm Dutch. I have an eating
disorder."

Did I hurt your iddy-biddy feelings somewhere, is that it? Does he
need a
big hug?

How could *you* hurt *my* feelings? I think you overestimate your
impact
on me.

My estimate is based on clear evidence, your obsessive dogging of my
tracks
attempting to find holes in my arguments. You have been trying for a
couple
of weeks, ever since I rebuffed your first attempts convince me I was
bullying SN.

Once again, you overestimate your impact on me. I choose to participate
here because I choose it.

That is tautological.

I choose it for a variety of reasons.

That is avoidance.

That you
make yourself the centre of my world is your choice.

The replies are TO ME.

We may be making headway in that you do seem to recognize that SN was
being bullied. Acknowledging that would be difficult, I imagine.

Again, you cannot resolve your insistence that people be left to their
own
devices with your intervention in this case of so-called "bullying". SN
is
clearly a voluntary participant or she would simply killfile the threads.
Such inconsistency is a signal that your thinking lacks a solid
foundation.
I referred to it before as a failure to operate from your genuine self.

Wrong. She has clearly asked that she not be treated this way. Her
request has been ignored. she has clearly stated that she chooses to be
in this group to discuss other issues and not to be verbally abused. The
bullies just refuse to do what she wants.

Her actions betray her words. She know how to use a killfile. She is getting
a kick out of it.

Her choice is to participate in the group. It is coincidence that others
are acting in this way towards her.

It is no coincidence that she continues to respond, and fails to killfile
any of these so-called bullies.


4 bullies picking one person is just cowardice. Control freaks unite.
Before you misconstrue my intent, you have stated that denial needs to
be addressed. Feel free to continue to be abusive to SN, but I did want
to address your denial.

She loves the attention, and you are falling for it as much as any of us.

In article , "Dutch"
wrote:

"Ron" wrote in message
...
In article , "Dutch"
wrote:

"Ron" wrote
Anything from the eating disordered is suspect. Denial is a
terrible
symptom of any disorder. "Hi, I'm Dutch. I have an eating
disorder."

Did I hurt your iddy-biddy feelings somewhere, is that it? Does he
need a
big hug?

How could *you* hurt *my* feelings? I think you overestimate your
impact
on me.

My estimate is based on clear evidence, your obsessive dogging of my
tracks
attempting to find holes in my arguments. You have been trying for a
couple
of weeks, ever since I rebuffed your first attempts convince me I was
bullying SN.

Once again, you overestimate your impact on me. I choose to participate
here because I choose it.

That is tautological.

I choose it for a variety of reasons.

That is avoidance.

That you
make yourself the centre of my world is your choice.

The replies are TO ME.

We may be making headway in that you do seem to recognize that SN was
being bullied. Acknowledging that would be difficult, I imagine.

Again, you cannot resolve your insistence that people be left to their
own
devices with your intervention in this case of so-called "bullying". SN
is
clearly a voluntary participant or she would simply killfile the threads.
Such inconsistency is a signal that your thinking lacks a solid
foundation.
I referred to it before as a failure to operate from your genuine self.

Wrong. She has clearly asked that she not be treated this way. Her
request has been ignored. she has clearly stated that she chooses to be
in this group to discuss other issues and not to be verbally abused. The
bullies just refuse to do what she wants.

Her actions betray her words. She know how to use a killfile. She is getting
a kick out of it.

Her choice is to participate in the group. It is coincidence that others
are acting in this way towards her.

It is no coincidence that she continues to respond, and fails to killfile
any of these so-called bullies.


4 bullies picking one person is just cowardice. Control freaks unite.
Before you misconstrue my intent, you have stated that denial needs to
be addressed. Feel free to continue to be abusive to SN, but I did want
to address your denial.

She loves the attention, and you are falling for it as much as any of us.

SO-CALLED. Are you a ****ing air head. Whether she stays, goes or
killfiles, the actions are still those of bullies. Man, what a ****-tard.

"Ron" wrote

She loves the attention, and you are falling for it as much as any of us.

SO-CALLED. Are you a ****ing air head. Whether she stays, goes or
killfiles, the actions are still those of bullies. Man, what a ****-tard.

Nope, not bullying. She's an adult participating voluntarily.

In article , "Dutch"
wrote:

"Ron" wrote

She loves the attention, and you are falling for it as much as any of us.

SO-CALLED. Are you a ****ing air head. Whether she stays, goes or
killfiles, the actions are still those of bullies. Man, what a ****-tard.

Nope, not bullying. She's an adult participating voluntarily.

****tard. Participation in bullying is still bullying. Voluntary or
involuntary participation in bullying is still bullying. ****ing flawed
reject.