In article t,
"rick etter" wrote:

"Ron" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Scented Nectar" wrote:

I had 5 reasons why not.

I addressed two of the chief ones here, and showed them to be
bull****.
All the rest are bull****, too.

Address the others too, then maybe I'll consider the test.

I'm curious Rudy. What information appears to the person who holds an
online quiz through a website?
==================
We already know what your mental illness has shown, queer-boy...

We'll ring a bell when we want you to respond, rick.

In article .com,
"Rudy Canoza" wrote:

witless Ron wrote:
In article .com,
"Rudy Canoza" wrote:

Scented Nectar wrote:
I had 5 reasons why not.

I addressed two of the chief ones here, and showed them to be
bull****. All the rest are bull****, too.

Address the others too, then maybe I'll consider the test.

I already demolished them when you first stated them.

You're lying. You have no intention of taking the quiz, because
you're
afraid - deeply and irrationally afraid.

I notice how you are attempting to manipulate

I'm not manipulating anyone. You are wrong.

If you were intelligent, confident and not disguising your true
motivation then you wouldn't need to attempt to sway Scented to take an
online test to secure personal information through a webiste. (See how
manipulation works.)

The reason is FEAR. You're afraid of something, and it's
something
terribly irrational, because we both know that no awful
consequence
will come of your taking the quiz.

It's not fear.

It's fear: deep, irrational, paralyzing fear.

In article .com,
"Rudy Canoza" wrote:

uncurious Ron wrote:
In article ,
"Scented Nectar" wrote:

I had 5 reasons why not.

I addressed two of the chief ones here, and showed them to be
bull****.
All the rest are bull****, too.

Address the others too, then maybe I'll consider the test.

I'm curious Rudy.

No, you're not, Ron.

What information appears to the person who holds an
online quiz through a website?
I've already indicated the information that will be revealed.

You avoided the question -- a tactic for manipulators. When a person
logs into a website that purports to have a quiz, what information is
revealed to the host of the website?

"Ron" wrote in message
...
In article t,
"rick etter" wrote:

"Ron" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Scented Nectar" wrote:

I had 5 reasons why not.

I addressed two of the chief ones here, and showed them to be
bull****.
All the rest are bull****, too.

Address the others too, then maybe I'll consider the test.

I'm curious Rudy. What information appears to the person who holds an
online quiz through a website?
==================
We already know what your mental illness has shown, queer-boy...

We'll ring a bell when we want you to respond, rick.
==================
Ah, yes, your tinker-bell syndrome. I don't think so, pansy-boy. Maybe it
works for your HIV infected fudge packers, but it doesn't cut it here.

In article ,
"rick etter" wrote:

"Ron" wrote in message
...
In article t,
"rick etter" wrote:

"Ron" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Scented Nectar" wrote:

I had 5 reasons why not.

I addressed two of the chief ones here, and showed them to be
bull****.
All the rest are bull****, too.

Address the others too, then maybe I'll consider the test.

I'm curious Rudy. What information appears to the person who holds an
online quiz through a website?
==================
We already know what your mental illness has shown, queer-boy...

We'll ring a bell when we want you to respond, rick.
==================
Ah, yes, your tinker-bell syndrome. I don't think so, pansy-boy. Maybe it
works for your HIV infected fudge packers, but it doesn't cut it here.

Drop the charade rick. You'll be a much nicer person once you come out
of the closet.

Subject: Liar Skunky's pathetic excuses
From: "Rudy Canoza"

Skunky won't take the political quiz because she claims it to be
"off-topic" from vegetarianism, and because it would eat up too much of
her time.

Google reveals Skunky has posted something like 20 times today in
alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian, alt.food.vegan and
talk.politics.animals, and NOT ONE of the posts was on the topic of
vegetarianism. She also has been posting intermittenly over some five
hours.

To bad you don't all subscribe to alt.dumbass.crossposters.getaclue

Capt. Bill

Ron wrote:
In article .com,
"Rudy Canoza" wrote:


witless Ron wrote:

In article .com,
"Rudy Canoza" wrote:


Scented Nectar wrote:

I had 5 reasons why not.

I addressed two of the chief ones here, and showed them to be
bull****. All the rest are bull****, too.

Address the others too, then maybe I'll consider the test.

I already demolished them when you first stated them.

You're lying. You have no intention of taking the quiz, because

you're

afraid - deeply and irrationally afraid.

I notice how you are attempting to manipulate

I'm not manipulating anyone. You are wrong.


If you were intelligent, confident and not disguising your true
motivation

All conditions met.

then you wouldn't need to attempt to sway

So many infinitives, so little sense. Non sequitur,
Ronnie. Your IF-THEN is bogus.

Scented to take an
online test to secure personal information through a webiste.

You moron. I'm not asking her to provide any personal
information through a website. I posted 10 statements
in usenet and asked her to give her reactions. There
is no subterfuge.

Ron wrote:

In article .com,
"Rudy Canoza" wrote:


uncurious Ron wrote:

In article ,
"Scented Nectar" wrote:


I had 5 reasons why not.

I addressed two of the chief ones here, and showed them to be

bull****.

All the rest are bull****, too.

Address the others too, then maybe I'll consider the test.

I'm curious Rudy.

No, you're not, Ron.


What information appears to the person who holds an
online quiz through a website?

I've already indicated the information that will be revealed.


You avoided the question

I didn't. I did already indicated how her responses
will be used.

And it isn't through a WEBSITE, you colossal idiot.

Ron wrote:

In article ,
"rick etter" wrote:


We already know what your mental illness has shown, queer-boy...

We'll ring a bell when we want you to respond, rick.

==================
Ah, yes, your tinker-bell syndrome. I don't think so, pansy-boy. Maybe it
works for your HIV infected fudge packers, but it doesn't cut it here.


Drop the charade rick. You'll be a much nicer person once you come out
of the closet.

And AGAIN, we see Ronnie attempting to insult someone
by suggesting the person is homo.

You really are a self-loathing homo, Ron. Get help.

Scented Nectar wrote:

Skunky won't take the political quiz because she claims it to be
"off-topic" from vegetarianism, and because it would eat up too much
of her time.


It would.

It wouldn't. You spend a ton of time here. You'd just
have to let some other topics go. You don't need to
write all the off-topic posts you already do.



Google reveals Skunky has posted something like 20 times today in
alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian, alt.food.vegan and
talk.politics.animals, and NOT ONE of the posts was on the topic of
vegetarianism. She also has been posting intermittenly over some five
hours.

Why are you afraid to take the political quiz, Skunky? Your excuses
don't hold up.


I had 5 reasons why not.

Weak, weak dodge. Five pieces of bull**** I already
addressed.

It all comes down to fear.