wrote in message
oups.com...
Gee whiz, NOYB. You have never ever really mentioned being religious.


http://www.awkkkk.org/kludd/kluddkorner.htm

Can we assume you're posting what "some" feel because it is what you
feel as well?

Hehehe. Nice try, but wrong.

The author is Democratic Senator Robert Byrd...who is now spear-heading the
opposition to Rice.

From what I read, the "opposition to Rice" is pretty inconsequential,
and is "spearheaded" by
Barbara Boxer and John Kerry. Any opposition is strictly ceremonial,
and because some lowlife rightwingers with bad intentions might decide
to play the race card in reverse, ("They couldn't possibly be opposed
to Rice on philosophical or politcal grounds, its only because she's a
woman and/or she's black....."), and because in dumbed down America
that little sound byte would resonate better than an accurate, more
complex answer- opposing Rice could take a toll when the next election
comes around.

It wouldn't even matter if liberal black people refered to her as
"Uncle Tom's Brown Rice," it's still politically dangerous to expose
ones flank to the few right wing hypocrites ready to yell "racism!"

As long as the Republicans hold congress, Bush can push anybody through
he likes. We could see Ken Lay as Secty. of the Treasury. Who knows?
He's a close friend of GWB's and we still might.

wrote in message
oups.com...
From what I read, the "opposition to Rice" is pretty inconsequential,
and is "spearheaded" by
Barbara Boxer and John Kerry. Any opposition is strictly ceremonial,
and because some lowlife rightwingers with bad intentions might decide
to play the race card in reverse, ("They couldn't possibly be opposed
to Rice on philosophical or politcal grounds, its only because she's a
woman and/or she's black....."),

How is it "the race card in reverse"? Is Rice not black?

Regardless of what you may have heard to the contrary, Byrd is definitely
one of the Democratic Senators who is spearheading the opposition. Given
his history as a member in the KKK, one must consider racism as part of his
motivation.

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

wrote in message
oups.com...
From what I read, the "opposition to Rice" is pretty inconsequential,
and is "spearheaded" by
Barbara Boxer and John Kerry. Any opposition is strictly ceremonial,
and because some lowlife rightwingers with bad intentions might decide
to play the race card in reverse, ("They couldn't possibly be opposed
to Rice on philosophical or politcal grounds, its only because she's a
woman and/or she's black....."),

How is it "the race card in reverse"? Is Rice not black?


Because it's normally the low-life libs that play the race card. And play
it, and play it....

"Jack Goff" wrote in message
. com...

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

wrote in message
oups.com...
From what I read, the "opposition to Rice" is pretty inconsequential,
and is "spearheaded" by
Barbara Boxer and John Kerry. Any opposition is strictly ceremonial,
and because some lowlife rightwingers with bad intentions might decide
to play the race card in reverse, ("They couldn't possibly be opposed
to Rice on philosophical or politcal grounds, its only because she's a
woman and/or she's black....."),

How is it "the race card in reverse"? Is Rice not black?


Because it's normally the low-life libs that play the race card.

I wanted Gould to admit that.

Jack Goff wrote:

Because it's normally the low-life libs that play the race card. And
play
it, and play it....

******************************************

At least Jack recognizes that somebody yelling, "They only oppose Rice
because she's a black woman" is playing the race card. As far as his
opinion that some other group does it more or less often,,,,,,,that's
not relevant to our examination of whether or not NOYB has done it here.

wrote in message
oups.com...

less often,,,,,,,that's not

Tuuk? Is that you?

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

wrote in message
oups.com...
Jack Goff wrote:

Because it's normally the low-life libs that play the race card. And
play
it, and play it....

******************************************

At least Jack recognizes that somebody yelling, "They only oppose Rice
because she's a black woman" is playing the race card. As far as his
opinion that some other group does it more or less often,,,,,,,that's
not relevant to our examination of whether or not NOYB has done it here.

But it is relevant when judging your statement that "lowlife rightwingers
with bad intentions might decide
to play the race card in reverse". If just a tactic, it's a play straight
out of the lowlife playbook of the lowlife Democratic Party. If true, it
sinks the lowlife lib's boat, eh?

NOYB wrote:

How is it "the race card in reverse"? Is Rice not black?

Regardless of what you may have heard to the contrary, Byrd is
definitely
one of the Democratic Senators who is spearheading the opposition.
Given
his history as a member in the KKK, one must consider racism as part of
his
motivation.


**************

And that Byrd quote is several years old, and had nothing specifically
to do with Condi Rice's nomination. *You* dredged it up, and tossed it
out as though it were an accurate reflection of somebody's personal
feelings about Rice's qualifications to be SOS.

You don't get it. It's possible to oppose a black person without
oppposing that person *because* they're black. It takes a fairly
colorblind person to realize this.

On 20 Jan 2005 10:56:51 -0800, wrote:

We could see Ken Lay as Secty. of the Treasury. Who knows?
He's a close friend of GWB's and we still might.

=========================================

Ken could certainly find a way to balance the books and close the
trade gap.

For a time.

How's boating in the PNW these days?