Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#36
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Doug Kanter wrote: I almost did buy one two years ago - a Crown Victoria, since I wanted a rear wheel drive car for towing. I would've preferred that car to my pickup truck because the gas mileage was about 25% better. But then, I read about the feature that wasn't in the brochu The thing about the exploding gas tank and rear-end collisions. I realize other cars may have this problem, but that fact had no bearing on my decision. I may look again in the future, but only after finding out if the issue has been dealt with. Police departments are happy to dispense this information. "Paul Schilter" paulschilter@comcast dot net wrote in message ... Doug, I can understand how you feel. I work as an electrician, for Ford at the Romeo Engine Plant. I hired in the in 1989. Since we were building the engine plant we went to a lot of classes. We learned that Ford changed its way of doing business because of the Japanese. What you say is completely true and very embarrassing. They're whole focus was on numbers, we've since learnt different. Today quality is the first priority. Anyone can stop the line if something is wrong. No we're not perfect but we sure as hell are trying. The union has a quality rep that you can call if you feel quality is being ignored. A lot of the members of upper management in the plant come and go as they move up the ladder. But we as members of an engine building team will either prosper or fail with this plant are here for the long term. The product that we deliver to you determines our future. I assure you that the majority of us are very concerned with quality. Doug, I appo;igize about the past and hope you check us out in the future. Paul "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... snipped How can you not understand? Millions of people got ****ed up the ass by the American car makers. Those memories don't fade for many, many years. Toyota offers cars that are damned close to perfect. Unless you require a "niche car" like the one you bought, why gamble with an American car? My brother in law used to bitch at me about how I was costing Americans jobs by buying Japanese. My response was simple: My second Ford was in the shop 5 times in the first year (1975). My boss read me the riot act: Find a way to get to work, or work somewhere else. In other words, the Ford was about to cost me MY job. When it finally died, I bought a Toyota. My logic: If American engineers can't build a car correctly, they deserve to lose their jobs. It's an interesting phenomenon in America: Pick 10 products, one of them being a cars. For each product, ask 10,000 people what should happen to the manufacturers of those products if they're poorly built for years on end. For 9 of the products, people will say what they should: The manufacturers should go out of business. For cars, they'll cut the manufacturers a ridiculous amount of slack. It's as if cars have some sort of religious status. I makes no sense at all. The Crown Vic was my favorite US full-sized car, until that "defect" came to light. A friend has the small Caddy whatever, and it's a pretty nice car. Ford has a new sedan, the 500 something, that looks kind of interesting. Most of the GM cars I've been in leave much to be desired, and the Chrysler products are pretty grim. In the car lines, I think it is tough to beat Toyota, and it doesn't matter where they are assembled. But I think the full-size Ford and Chevy trucks are aces. And for $50,000, there is nothing around to equal the Corvette. I looked at a Dodge intrepid, but as I mentioned elsewhere, pieces were falling off the dash. Even funnier, though: I asked the sales thing "Is this front or rear wheel drive?" He said "Hmmm.....it's probably one or the other. Why do you need to know?" Down the center stage trapdoor with him. :-) |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|