Doug Kanter wrote:
You know what's so pathetic about this subject? It was obvious to any
thinking person that troops would have to be moved from one campaign to the
other. If Bush a real leader, he wouldn't have waited until the press was
nipping at his heels to discuss this subject. No. He would've been proactive
and told the country what was going on up front, and explained the reasoning
behind it.

Doesn't matter. Even when it became glaringly obvious that George Bush
Jr doesn't have a clue, and cannot justify *any* of "his" policies and
actions in office, and the damage done by his administration is also
made glaringly obvious, he still won the election. After all, it's a
popularity contest and President Bush is a "likeable guy."



... If people are going to receive bad news, they'd rather get it
with an explanation, I think. It shows that the bearer of the news trusts
and respects their intelligence.


But in this case, 51% of the people who voted didn't have any
intelligence. Oh well.


At least that's how I would do things if were king.


You didn't pick your parents right, that's all.

DSK