On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 11:05:00 -0500, DSK wrote:

Dave Hall wrote:
You are convinced that Bush is guilty guilty guilty, but you have no
proof as to what he is guilty of.

Quote *one* post of mine where I said President Bush is guilty of
anything...

You just did below.


Other than lying (which is proven by his own public statements), such as
starting a war under false pretenses.

Where has he lied about that? What proof do you have that he
intentionally made a false statement?


Of course, he's unquestionably
guilty of dodging service in Viet Nam

At least he served in SOME capacity as compared to some other public
figures who completely dodged the draft.


, of DWI, and of various kinds of
fiscal malfeasance, all of which he's been found guilty of by our legal
system, and let slide because of his family connections & wealth.

DWI is a minor offense. The stuff stupid teenagers do. He had a wild
side in his youth. So sue him.


You've often claimed to be a conservative, yet you are constantly
defending liberals

Not at all. I am pointing out the stupidity of many people who claim to
be "conservative" but are nothing other than hate-spewing morons.

A differing opinion is automatically considered "hate" to you? That's
the sort of demonization games that liberals play when they try to
silence the opposition.

Besides, President Clinton was a centrist, a moderate. That is one of
the keys to his success.

He was more or less forced to be that way once the republicans took
over the congress in '95. Since Clinton was more concerned with his
legacy, he learned how to dance.

If you recall in the beginning of his first term, he tried to sell us
the bill of goods for a universal health care system. That's hardly
"moderate". You'll also note that this type of behavior disappeared
after '95, when it became evident after the shift in power in
congress, that the American people just didn't want a liberal
president. He "adjusted". No more, no less.

Dave