Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
NOYB wrote:
Doh! You do know why it's called an *INTERCONTINENTAL* Ballistic Missile, don't you? Since 1981, China has had ICBM's that can reach the continental US: http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/china/icbm/ Excuse me, but you're taking all that right-wing fantasy a little too seriously. Are these the ICBM's that Clinton sold them targeting computers for? But then, you don't even understand why they call it "rocket science" do you? ... I remember the days when you at least put up a decent fight. You can't remember to tie your shoes in the morning, that's why your mommy has to help you. Fact- a scary scary web page about Chinese missiles does not prove that the Iranians will have one within our lifetimes. Fact- a much more realistic threat is a nuke smuggled in across our border DSK |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "DSK" wrote in message . .. NOYB wrote: Doh! You do know why it's called an *INTERCONTINENTAL* Ballistic Missile, don't you? Since 1981, China has had ICBM's that can reach the continental US: http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/china/icbm/ Excuse me, but you're taking all that right-wing fantasy a little too seriously. Are these the ICBM's that Clinton sold them targeting computers for? But then, you don't even understand why they call it "rocket science" do you? ... I remember the days when you at least put up a decent fight. You can't remember to tie your shoes in the morning, that's why your mommy has to help you. Fact- a scary scary web page about Chinese missiles does not prove that the Iranians will have one within our lifetimes. China is selling them the technology. |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... NOYB wrote: "DSK" wrote in message . .. NOYB wrote: Doh! You do know why it's called an *INTERCONTINENTAL* Ballistic Missile, don't you? Since 1981, China has had ICBM's that can reach the continental US: http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/china/icbm/ Excuse me, but you're taking all that right-wing fantasy a little too seriously. Are these the ICBM's that Clinton sold them targeting computers for? But then, you don't even understand why they call it "rocket science" do you? ... I remember the days when you at least put up a decent fight. You can't remember to tie your shoes in the morning, that's why your mommy has to help you. Fact- a scary scary web page about Chinese missiles does not prove that the Iranians will have one within our lifetimes. China is selling them the technology. If that is the case, then once again I ask you, why hasn't the Idiot Known As Bush invaded Chine? Here's your answer: We'd get our asses whipped. Again. I have no doubt that we'd win a conflict with *any* country in the World. However, our casualty rate in a war against a country like China would be in the hundreds of thousands. With casualties that high, our leaders would most likely employ nukes...raising the death toll on each side into the tens of millions ( in China's case, probably into the hundreds of millions). That's why we haven't invaded China. Nuclear weapons are the great equalizer...which is why we can't allow a country like Iran to obtain them. The Muslim extremists who seem to be running things these days believe that the Koran tells them that they should strike at the infidels if their military might should become equal or superior to ours. We only invade dippy little countries whose military cannot fight back. Because sooner or later those dippy little countries will get their hands on a nuke...and at that point, they'll go looking for a fight with us. |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
NOYB wrote:
Think a few months to a few years. The Iranians are working on developing their own ICBM's, and it's believed that they'll have 'em by the end of this decade. By whom? Paranoid whacko freaks like you? Why would anybody bother to develop a ballistic missile when they could just about ship a nuke UPS, and President Bush would not bother to upgrade border security to stop it? DSK |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 21:12:22 -0500, DSK wrote:
NOYB wrote: Think a few months to a few years. The Iranians are working on developing their own ICBM's, and it's believed that they'll have 'em by the end of this decade. By whom? Paranoid whacko freaks like you? Why would anybody bother to develop a ballistic missile when they could just about ship a nuke UPS, and President Bush would not bother to upgrade border security to stop it? Because we aren't the only target on their agenda? Dave |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Why would anybody bother to develop a ballistic missile when they could
just about ship a nuke UPS, and President Bush would not bother to upgrade border security to stop it? Dave Hall wrote: Because we aren't the only target on their agenda? A missile can be too easily backtracked. The best way to do great harm to two enemies with one blow would be to smuggle a missile into an enemy territory and launch it at the United States. OTOH that might be a lot of extra work. The perpetrator of the worst terrorist attack against the U.S. (or anybody else) in history is still walking free. DSK |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Why hasn't the Idiot Known As Bush attacked China?
What? And bankrupt Walmart???? |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 21:05:50 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote: BSCHNAUTZ wrote: Why hasn't the Idiot Known As Bush attacked China? What? And bankrupt Walmart???? With that result alone, it would be worth considering, since Wal-Mart does more damage to the United States than all the Moslem terrorists put together. In what way? Dave |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 08:43:16 -0500, Dave Hall
wrote: On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 21:05:50 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: BSCHNAUTZ wrote: Why hasn't the Idiot Known As Bush attacked China? What? And bankrupt Walmart???? With that result alone, it would be worth considering, since Wal-Mart does more damage to the United States than all the Moslem terrorists put together. In what way? Dave It isn't unionized and therefore doesn't support union officials. It also provides goods to those who can't afford to buy the same thing at Macy's for half again as much. I personally hate to shop at WalMart, but will do so on occasion. WalMart has the cheapest 40lb bags of black oil sunflower seeds in the area. My birds love them. John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... BSCHNAUTZ wrote: Why hasn't the Idiot Known As Bush attacked China? What? And bankrupt Walmart???? With that result alone, it would be worth considering, since Wal-Mart does more damage to the United States than all the Moslem terrorists put together. I just bought my wife a notebook computer from Walmart for $648. For another $40, I got a 3 year extended warranty. It has a1.2 GHz AMD Athlon 4 processor, 256k RAM, DVD/CD/RW, 40 gig HD, and built-in Wi-Fi. http://www.walmart.com/catalog/produ...uct_id=3202221 She got it primarily to wirelessly surf the web, download music to burn to a CD, and to do light word-processing work. It's a nice little notebook. The only negatives are that the fan seems a bit louder than on my Compaq, and the battery life is about 50% less (I have a Centrino processor). Given Wal-Mart's liberal return policy, and the fact that a 3-year extended warranty is only $40, I figured that I can't go wrong should the thing crap out in a year or two. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!!__________==___ | General | |||
Stupid is as stupid does...\ | General | |||
Mystery Beach Photo Contest | ASA | |||
Another Boat show | ASA | |||
Just how stupid are RBP posters? | General |