Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11   Report Post  
DSK
 
Posts: n/a
Default

NOYB wrote:
Doh! You do know why it's called an *INTERCONTINENTAL* Ballistic Missile,
don't you?

Since 1981, China has had ICBM's that can reach the continental US:

http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/china/icbm/


Excuse me, but you're taking all that right-wing fantasy a little too
seriously. Are these the ICBM's that Clinton sold them targeting
computers for?

But then, you don't even understand why they call it "rocket science" do
you?



... I remember the days when you at least put up a decent fight.


You can't remember to tie your shoes in the morning, that's why your
mommy has to help you.

Fact- a scary scary web page about Chinese missiles does not prove that
the Iranians will have one within our lifetimes.

Fact- a much more realistic threat is a nuke smuggled in across our border

DSK

  #12   Report Post  
NOYB
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"DSK" wrote in message
. ..
NOYB wrote:
Doh! You do know why it's called an *INTERCONTINENTAL* Ballistic
Missile, don't you?

Since 1981, China has had ICBM's that can reach the continental US:

http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/china/icbm/


Excuse me, but you're taking all that right-wing fantasy a little too
seriously. Are these the ICBM's that Clinton sold them targeting computers
for?

But then, you don't even understand why they call it "rocket science" do
you?



... I remember the days when you at least put up a decent fight.


You can't remember to tie your shoes in the morning, that's why your mommy
has to help you.

Fact- a scary scary web page about Chinese missiles does not prove that
the Iranians will have one within our lifetimes.


China is selling them the technology.


  #13   Report Post  
NOYB
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"DSK" wrote in message
. ..

NOYB wrote:

Doh! You do know why it's called an *INTERCONTINENTAL* Ballistic
Missile, don't you?

Since 1981, China has had ICBM's that can reach the continental US:

http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/china/icbm/

Excuse me, but you're taking all that right-wing fantasy a little too
seriously. Are these the ICBM's that Clinton sold them targeting
computers for?

But then, you don't even understand why they call it "rocket science" do
you?



... I remember the days when you at least put up a decent fight.

You can't remember to tie your shoes in the morning, that's why your
mommy has to help you.

Fact- a scary scary web page about Chinese missiles does not prove that
the Iranians will have one within our lifetimes.



China is selling them the technology.



If that is the case, then once again I ask you, why hasn't the Idiot Known
As Bush invaded Chine?

Here's your answer:

We'd get our asses whipped. Again.


I have no doubt that we'd win a conflict with *any* country in the World.
However, our casualty rate in a war against a country like China would be in
the hundreds of thousands. With casualties that high, our leaders would
most likely employ nukes...raising the death toll on each side into the tens
of millions ( in China's case, probably into the hundreds of millions).
That's why we haven't invaded China.

Nuclear weapons are the great equalizer...which is why we can't allow a
country like Iran to obtain them. The Muslim extremists who seem to be
running things these days believe that the Koran tells them that they should
strike at the infidels if their military might should become equal or
superior to ours.




We only invade dippy little countries whose military cannot fight back.


Because sooner or later those dippy little countries will get their hands on
a nuke...and at that point, they'll go looking for a fight with us.


  #14   Report Post  
DSK
 
Posts: n/a
Default

NOYB wrote:
Think a few months to a few years. The Iranians are working on developing
their own ICBM's, and it's believed that they'll have 'em by the end of this
decade.


By whom? Paranoid whacko freaks like you?

Why would anybody bother to develop a ballistic missile when they could
just about ship a nuke UPS, and President Bush would not bother to
upgrade border security to stop it?

DSK

  #15   Report Post  
Dave Hall
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 21:12:22 -0500, DSK wrote:

NOYB wrote:
Think a few months to a few years. The Iranians are working on developing
their own ICBM's, and it's believed that they'll have 'em by the end of this
decade.


By whom? Paranoid whacko freaks like you?

Why would anybody bother to develop a ballistic missile when they could
just about ship a nuke UPS, and President Bush would not bother to
upgrade border security to stop it?



Because we aren't the only target on their agenda?


Dave



  #16   Report Post  
DSK
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Why would anybody bother to develop a ballistic missile when they could
just about ship a nuke UPS, and President Bush would not bother to
upgrade border security to stop it?




Dave Hall wrote:
Because we aren't the only target on their agenda?


A missile can be too easily backtracked. The best way to do great harm
to two enemies with one blow would be to smuggle a missile into an enemy
territory and launch it at the United States.

OTOH that might be a lot of extra work. The perpetrator of the worst
terrorist attack against the U.S. (or anybody else) in history is still
walking free.

DSK

  #17   Report Post  
BSCHNAUTZ
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Why hasn't the Idiot Known As Bush attacked China?

What? And bankrupt Walmart????
  #18   Report Post  
Dave Hall
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 21:05:50 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

BSCHNAUTZ wrote:
Why hasn't the Idiot Known As Bush attacked China?



What? And bankrupt Walmart????



With that result alone, it would be worth considering, since Wal-Mart
does more damage to the United States than all the Moslem terrorists put
together.



In what way?

Dave
  #19   Report Post  
JohnH
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 08:43:16 -0500, Dave Hall
wrote:

On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 21:05:50 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

BSCHNAUTZ wrote:
Why hasn't the Idiot Known As Bush attacked China?


What? And bankrupt Walmart????



With that result alone, it would be worth considering, since Wal-Mart
does more damage to the United States than all the Moslem terrorists put
together.



In what way?

Dave


It isn't unionized and therefore doesn't support union officials. It
also provides goods to those who can't afford to buy the same thing at
Macy's for half again as much.

I personally hate to shop at WalMart, but will do so on occasion.
WalMart has the cheapest 40lb bags of black oil sunflower seeds in the
area. My birds love them.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes
  #20   Report Post  
NOYB
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
BSCHNAUTZ wrote:
Why hasn't the Idiot Known As Bush attacked China?



What? And bankrupt Walmart????



With that result alone, it would be worth considering, since Wal-Mart does
more damage to the United States than all the Moslem terrorists put
together.


I just bought my wife a notebook computer from Walmart for $648. For
another $40, I got a 3 year extended warranty. It has a1.2 GHz AMD Athlon 4
processor, 256k RAM, DVD/CD/RW, 40 gig HD, and built-in Wi-Fi.

http://www.walmart.com/catalog/produ...uct_id=3202221

She got it primarily to wirelessly surf the web, download music to burn to a
CD, and to do light word-processing work. It's a nice little notebook. The
only negatives are that the fan seems a bit louder than on my Compaq, and
the battery life is about 50% less (I have a Centrino processor).

Given Wal-Mart's liberal return policy, and the fact that a 3-year extended
warranty is only $40, I figured that I can't go wrong should the thing crap
out in a year or two.



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!!__________==___ Larry Cable General 6 December 3rd 04 09:48 AM
Stupid is as stupid does...\ Don White General 0 November 21st 04 05:55 PM
Mystery Beach Photo Contest Horvath ASA 21 October 3rd 03 05:45 PM
Another Boat show Donal ASA 20 September 30th 03 05:53 PM
Just how stupid are RBP posters? Ed Edelenbos General 21 August 29th 03 03:44 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:02 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017