"Gene Kearns" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 29 Dec 2003 19:56:35 GMT, "NOYB" wrote:

From Reuters:


Saddam Giving Info on Weapons and Funds-Official
Mon December 29, 2003 06:17 AM ET

DUBAI (Reuters) - Saddam Hussein has given his U.S. captors information
on
hidden weapons and as much as $40 billion he may have seized while he was
Iraq's president ...... the council had asked international legal
companies to track the
money.


All of which, most probably, means that none of this booty is in Iraq.
Why did we have to capture Saddam to figure this out?

Considering the source..... how much of this is truth?

Allawi said interrogators were now focusing on whether Saddam -- arrested
by
U.S. forces this month and held at an undisclosed site -- had any links
to
militant groups.


Whether? Whether?? I thought that this was a given.

No. It's also been suggested that non-Iraqi's (under the control of groups
linked to al Qaeda) have been behind the attacks...and I'd bet that that is
the more likely scenario.



It is not clear whether Saddam was ever behind ambushes that have killed
at
least 211 U.S. soldiers since Washington declared major combat over on
May
1.


How do you define behind? Geesh.

Organizing, planning, financing, ordering, etc. I believe he was doing
nothing more than financing the attacks.