"Jim Carter" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
...
The Marxists?

No, not the Marxists, the "Freedom Fighters" is what they are called now.
You know, the people of a country that are fighting for their freedom.
Fighting to live free in a country that is being over run by a foreign
power.


Fine. So they're Freedom Fighters who just happen to be Marxists. Of
course, in a Marxist society, nobody is free...so your theory falls apart.

"NOYB" wrote in message
...
Fine. So they're Freedom Fighters who just happen to be Marxists. Of
course, in a Marxist society, nobody is free...so your theory falls apart.

The only ones to call the Freedom Fighters of Columbia "Marxists" is the CIA
and you. The rest of the world calls them "Democrats".

Jim Carter
Bayfield

"Jim Carter" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
...
Fine. So they're Freedom Fighters who just happen to be Marxists. Of
course, in a Marxist society, nobody is free...so your theory falls
apart.

The only ones to call the Freedom Fighters of Columbia "Marxists" is the
CIA
and you. The rest of the world calls them "Democrats".

I can see that. They grew in prominence through treacherous acts (namely
kidnapping for ransom, thievery, murder, and cocaine production). The term
"Democrat" certainly does fit them.

Nevertheless, you're probably right. Today, they are driven by money rather
than politics...so the term Marxist (although that's what they were in the
beginning) probably doesn't suit them. But they're certainly terrorists. I
*would* call them "Democratic terrorists", but then people would confuse
them with the ACLU and the Rainbow/PUSH coalition.