Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11   Report Post  
Wayne.B
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 18:50:04 -0700, "Bob La Londe"
wrote:
Your comments about prop, trailering, etc can all also be addressed with an
outboard that weighs a lot less for the same horsepower. Even a 4 stroke OB
will weigh a lot less than an I/O of the same SHP.

=========================================

That's true of course, and outboards are very popular around here.
It's probably about 50/50 when you look around. I think I have a mind
set against outboards for some reason and I'm not sure if it's
justified or not. My sense of things is that OBs are more expensive,
less reliable, and shorter lived. That may or may not be true, and
I'm sure there are persuasive arguments on both sides. I know that
in the case of my present boat which has a small block Chevy and an
Alpha I/O, parts are readily available, reasonably priced, and the
engine is well understood by virtually everyone. That does not always
seem to be the case with OBs in my experience. Prior to the
availability of 4 stroke OBs, I also believe that I/Os had the edge
on fuel economy.

  #12   Report Post  
Bob La Londe
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The fuel economy edge goes to fuel injected engines.

--
** FREE Fishing Lures
** Weekly drawing
** Public Fishing and Boating Forums
** www.YumaBassMan.com


"Wayne.B" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 18:50:04 -0700, "Bob La Londe"
wrote:
Your comments about prop, trailering, etc can all also be addressed with

an
outboard that weighs a lot less for the same horsepower. Even a 4 stroke

OB
will weigh a lot less than an I/O of the same SHP.

=========================================

That's true of course, and outboards are very popular around here.
It's probably about 50/50 when you look around. I think I have a mind
set against outboards for some reason and I'm not sure if it's
justified or not. My sense of things is that OBs are more expensive,
less reliable, and shorter lived. That may or may not be true, and
I'm sure there are persuasive arguments on both sides. I know that
in the case of my present boat which has a small block Chevy and an
Alpha I/O, parts are readily available, reasonably priced, and the
engine is well understood by virtually everyone. That does not always
seem to be the case with OBs in my experience. Prior to the
availability of 4 stroke OBs, I also believe that I/Os had the edge
on fuel economy.



  #13   Report Post  
Gordon
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dated design? I thought the idea was a functional boat. There is talk of
a fiberglass hull. See the yahoo "Bartender" group.
Gordon
"Wayne.B" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 13:09:10 GMT, "Gordon" wrote:

Bartender with straight inboard.


============================

That's an interesting recommendation, too bad the overall design looks
a little dated at this point. Does anybody make one in fiberglass
with a more up to date appearance?




  #14   Report Post  
bowgus
 
Posts: n/a
Default

My 2 cents ... for costs reasons, I went with I/O when I picked up my old
beater. I wanted a 4 stroke and used 4 strokes in the 200hp range are for me
big bucks ... and new is completely out of the question ... like $20K cdn
each. About used I/Os ... buying used could also be expensive ... for
example if there is riser or manifold corrosion for example, a used engine
could end up requiring a rebuild as well as new risers and manifolds.

"Wayne.B" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 18:50:04 -0700, "Bob La Londe"
wrote:
Your comments about prop, trailering, etc can all also be addressed with

an
outboard that weighs a lot less for the same horsepower. Even a 4 stroke

OB
will weigh a lot less than an I/O of the same SHP.

=========================================

That's true of course, and outboards are very popular around here.
It's probably about 50/50 when you look around. I think I have a mind
set against outboards for some reason and I'm not sure if it's
justified or not. My sense of things is that OBs are more expensive,
less reliable, and shorter lived. That may or may not be true, and
I'm sure there are persuasive arguments on both sides. I know that
in the case of my present boat which has a small block Chevy and an
Alpha I/O, parts are readily available, reasonably priced, and the
engine is well understood by virtually everyone. That does not always
seem to be the case with OBs in my experience. Prior to the
availability of 4 stroke OBs, I also believe that I/Os had the edge
on fuel economy.



  #15   Report Post  
alex
 
Posts: n/a
Default

OSPREY best of the best, look for the diesel w/the bravo 3 outdrive
I'll bet the sportfisherman will agree. good luck.
35' jason, Noank Ct.

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sailboat Recommendations please Danny ASA 42 October 3rd 04 01:22 PM
Two week Alaska vacation recommendations Darrell Criswell General 5 June 30th 04 04:58 AM
Portable Fish Finder Recommendations? Stephen Kormilo Electronics 10 February 5th 04 08:59 PM
Wood Canoe Recommendations? Scott Touring 2 August 25th 03 04:42 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:18 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017