Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Isn't there a political message board for all this?
I just joined, and love discussing boats etc...and unless al these
political posts are related to boats, what are they doing here? Isn't there a messag board elsewhere where you all can discuss these things? And believe me, I'm very interested in, and involved in this election and politics - but folks, here on this board...let's keep it ON topic! Boats! Rob Welling. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Welcome aboard Rob.
The best way to improve the signal to noise ratio is to produce and enhance some signal. Got a boating topic you'd care to discuss? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Rob, The most important thing for you to understand, no matter how cold or wrong it might be, it that politics IS going to be discussed here on rec.boats. It has been for years and it will continue to be. It's an unmoderated group which means there really isn't much anyone can do about it. Another very important thing to recognize about rec.boats is that if you do post a boating item you will probably get good response. That's especially true if what you post is a question. If you post a trip-report or general topic of conversation you might get some interest. But people here seem to love answering questions - and that's a good thing. Lastly, while your message was kindly worded and you, unlike many who complain about the politics, you had the guts to use a real-name and real-email address. That's great. But other than posting one advertisement for your services, it seems (Google) you've posted no other boating posts. So, instead of "walking into a room and start complaining" why not post about boats? If you have a 50-Ton master license you surely could help some of the boaters here that have questions. You surely have some interesting stories to tell. No? Gary Warner |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
It's an unmoderated group which
means there really isn't much anyone can do about it. And that's exactly the point that many of those squaking about content fail to understand, or at least fail to appreciate. This is a First Amendment site. Many people compare it unfavorably to sites where a censor/moderator receives all the incoming messages, decides whether he or she will allow them to appear at all, and then categorizes the item into a particular classification. Some people are just happier in an environment that is externally regulated and enjoy having a greater number of rules to follow. I suspect that some of the complaints come from people who disapprove of some of the particular politcal viewpoints expressed, moreso than the complaint that any views are expressed in the first place. Take Iboats.com as an example. Their home page this morning reveals that the folks over there are not that different, interest wise, from the folks at rec.boats. The most frequently visited category to date is "Johnson & Evinrude Outboard Troubles/Repair", with 131,662 posts. The second most frequently visited catefory is "Dockside Chat", where all the *non-boating related* political opinions, etc, wind up. 89,097 posts. The major difference between rec.boats and Iboats isn't that one has OT political posts and one doesn't, it's that a moderator puts all the OT posts into a single place to make it easier to avoid running into them. The moderator also insists that posters in the "Dockside Chat" behave respectfully toward one another (I assume that would rule out name calling and personal attacks). With OT stuff clearly in 2nd place over at Iboats, some other subjects also attract participation- but it is useful to compare these numbers to the just under 90,000 OT posts at that site: Mercury outboard repair: 65,175 Boat Topics not engine related: 61,226 Mercruiser, Volvo, and OMC I/O problems: 53,612 Outboard non-repair discusssions: 52,075 From there, the majority of the categories drop off to numbers below 15,000. Yes, there are political message boards. There are also censored and moderated newsgroups. Is boatered still around? There was a good example of a group that was ruined by a moderator, IMO. The moderator had a vested commercial interest in a towing service and was running an on-line chandlery. Posts critical of his products or services never saw the light of day. He'd quash all the political posts, except for those he happened to agree with, (and he was a blatant right winger). I once responded to a particulary vicious attack against "treasonous liberals all out to destroy my country, my family, and my religion", or some such extreme crap,,,,and the result was that my post never made the site and my posting privileges were permanently revoked. It's my opinon that self-censorship is unlikely to work on an open forum like rec.boats. Those who prefer a highly censored/moderated site have several to choose from, and most likely they would be happier there where they can click on the single boating topic that interests them at any particular moment than click past all the OT posts to find a thread that's boating related and with only a minimal amount of name calling and insult attached. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Gould 0738 wrote:
And that's exactly the point that many of those squaking about content fail to understand, or at least fail to appreciate. This is a First Amendment site. Many people compare it unfavorably to sites where a censor/moderator receives all the incoming messages, decides whether he or she will allow them to appear at all, and then categorizes the item into a particular classification. It has nothing to do with the First Amendment. The Internet is international. It *does* have to do with the increasing popularity and use of newsgroups and the decline of voluntary adherence to the original concept of their purpose/use. I am as guilty as the rest, although I do try to throw in a boating related topic here and there. Sometimes it is just too difficult to keep my mouth shut .... or, more precisely, fingers off the keyboard. Personally, I don't mind off-topic posts, particularly if they are interesting, informative or, above all, humorous. (Kinda miss Skipper). The political posts have become too much, most are nothing but a re-hash of previously posted opinions or positions. Fortunately, the election will soon be behind us and we can look forward to vote count fraud accusations. At least it will be new material. Eisboch |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
At least I come up with new posts, not like the idiots on the right.
"Eisboch" wrote in message ... Gould 0738 wrote: And that's exactly the point that many of those squaking about content fail to understand, or at least fail to appreciate. This is a First Amendment site. Many people compare it unfavorably to sites where a censor/moderator receives all the incoming messages, decides whether he or she will allow them to appear at all, and then categorizes the item into a particular classification. It has nothing to do with the First Amendment. The Internet is international. It *does* have to do with the increasing popularity and use of newsgroups and the decline of voluntary adherence to the original concept of their purpose/use. I am as guilty as the rest, although I do try to throw in a boating related topic here and there. Sometimes it is just too difficult to keep my mouth shut .... or, more precisely, fingers off the keyboard. Personally, I don't mind off-topic posts, particularly if they are interesting, informative or, above all, humorous. (Kinda miss Skipper). The political posts have become too much, most are nothing but a re-hash of previously posted opinions or positions. Fortunately, the election will soon be behind us and we can look forward to vote count fraud accusations. At least it will be new material. Eisboch |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Nice try, but Harry doesn't top post and he just doesn't write like that...
Harry Krause wrote: At least I come up with new posts, not like the idiots on the right. "Eisboch" wrote in message ... Gould 0738 wrote: And that's exactly the point that many of those squaking about content fail to understand, or at least fail to appreciate. This is a First Amendment site. Many people compare it unfavorably to sites where a censor/moderator receives all the incoming messages, decides whether he or she will allow them to appear at all, and then categorizes the item into a particular classification. It has nothing to do with the First Amendment. The Internet is international. It *does* have to do with the increasing popularity and use of newsgroups and the decline of voluntary adherence to the original concept of their purpose/use. I am as guilty as the rest, although I do try to throw in a boating related topic here and there. Sometimes it is just too difficult to keep my mouth shut .... or, more precisely, fingers off the keyboard. Personally, I don't mind off-topic posts, particularly if they are interesting, informative or, above all, humorous. (Kinda miss Skipper). The political posts have become too much, most are nothing but a re-hash of previously posted opinions or positions. Fortunately, the election will soon be behind us and we can look forward to vote count fraud accusations. At least it will be new material. Eisboch |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 12:58:59 -0400, Eisboch
wrote: Gould 0738 wrote: And that's exactly the point that many of those squaking about content fail to understand, or at least fail to appreciate. This is a First Amendment site. Many people compare it unfavorably to sites where a censor/moderator receives all the incoming messages, decides whether he or she will allow them to appear at all, and then categorizes the item into a particular classification. It has nothing to do with the First Amendment. The Internet is international. It *does* have to do with the increasing popularity and use of newsgroups and the decline of voluntary adherence to the original concept of their purpose/use. I am as guilty as the rest, although I do try to throw in a boating related topic here and there. Sometimes it is just too difficult to keep my mouth shut .... or, more precisely, fingers off the keyboard. Personally, I don't mind off-topic posts, particularly if they are interesting, informative or, above all, humorous. (Kinda miss Skipper). The political posts have become too much, most are nothing but a re-hash of previously posted opinions or positions. Fortunately, the election will soon be behind us and we can look forward to vote count fraud accusations. At least it will be new material. And it's already started. :) 12,000 Democrat lawyers in Florida. I would imagine that there will be at least as many Republican lawyers to counter. Imagine the fun. I still say, the only solution to all this is to shoot all the lawyers. Every, single, last, final one of them. Shakespeare was right. :) All the best, Tom -------------- "What the hell's the deal with this newsgroup... is there a computer terminal in the day room of some looney bin somewhere?" Bilgeman - circa 2004 |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
On Tuesday 26 October 2004 5:07 pm in rec.boats Gould 0738 wrote:
This is a First Amendment site. BALDERDASH. I am not even american and even I know that the first ammendment refers to your government restricting speech. Get real - this has nothing to do with your government. You get no protection here - Either post on topic or go away. There are other newsgroups where american politics are on topic and welcome. This is an international boating newsgroup and your political views are NOT WELCOME. -- My real address is crn (at) netunix (dot) com WARNING all messages containing attachments or html will be silently deleted. Send only plain text. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
( OT )_The new Pentagon papers | General | |||
OT--Not again! More Chinese money buying our politicians. | General | |||
Off topic messages | General |