On Sun, 21 Dec 2003 05:48:19 +0000, NOYB wrote:

If Bush's records are "unsealed" now, isn't about time Dean kept his
promise to unseal his?

Yup.

"thunder" wrote in message
news
On Sun, 21 Dec 2003 05:48:19 +0000, NOYB wrote:

If Bush's records are "unsealed" now, isn't about time Dean kept his
promise to unseal his?

Yup.


Think he will?

On Sun, 21 Dec 2003 07:26:00 +0000, NOYB wrote:


"thunder" wrote in message
news
On Sun, 21 Dec 2003 05:48:19 +0000, NOYB wrote:

If Bush's records are "unsealed" now, isn't about time Dean kept his
promise to unseal his?

Yup.


Think he will?

I've been doing a little reading on this tonight and a couple of things
have come to light. Bush's records aren't quite as "unsealed" as it would
appear. The decision of access is left to the Texas AG.

http://www.thevictoriaadvocate.com/o...-1820174c.html

As for Dean's records, he has decided to leave the decision to release the
records in the hands of a judge. I would also warn that there is probably
no "smoking gun", as sealing a portion of records seems to be pretty
standard. Personally, I think he should release them. In a democracy,
open government is important.

http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/story.hts/nation/2278349

http://www.burlingtonfreepress.com/s...s/dean/174.htm